View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient density unit under ORD did not decrease significantly.
Outcomenutrient density unit (NDU) e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “its nutrient density unit (NDU) did not decrease significantly due to the additional duck yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–635 t0 “rice–duck coculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil in oculum density did not significantly decrease from 1 to 12 months after in corporation.
Outcomesoil inoculum density e0 Directionnot a significant decrease e0 Comparator1 and 12 months e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Regardless of treatment, there was not a significant decrease in soil in oculum density between 1 and 12 months after residue was in corporated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–907 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
December NSC concentration remained high and did not decrease significantly under high forest density .
OutcomeNSC concentration e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the NSC concentration in December remained at a high level and did not significantly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1166 t0 “Vitex negundo Var. heterophylla ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–114 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation up to 33.3% at R3 caused no significant yield decline at any density .
Treatmentdefoliation of up to 33.3% at R3 e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Qualifierregardless of the plant density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The soybean tolerate defoliation of up to 33.3% at R3 with no significant decrease in grain yield, regardless of the plant density . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1255 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant decrease in photosynthesis ability of the fourth leaf or chlorophyll content was seen under 12 plants m −2 compared with 7.5 plants m −2.
Organ / stagefourth leave e0 Treatment12 plants m −2 e1 Outcomephotosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll content e0 Directionno significant decrease e1 Comparator7.5 plants m −2 e1 Verbatim
e0 “The photosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll content both decrease d with in creasing plant density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1727 e1 “but no significant decrease was observed under 12 plants m −2 compared to 7.5 plants m −2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1818 t0 “high density cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–101 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
HDOM-W did not significantly decrease wheat germination relative to chopped wheat straw.
Outcomewheat germination rate e0 Directionnot significantly decreased e0 Verbatim
e0 “compared to CWS, wheat germination rate was not significantly decrease d in the HDOM- W treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–848 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed review summary positive not significant (as stated) basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Summer ETc could reach 0.45 without significantly decreasing oil productivity.
Treatment0.45 in the summer e0 Outcomeoil productivity e0 Directionwithout a significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “could fall as low as 0.45 in the summer without a significant decrease in oil productivity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1405 t0 “Olive ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Root number did not differ significantly among XY, FM and DK.
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The difference in the number of roots of XY, FM and DK were not significant, so change in variety did not alleviate the decrease in the number of roots. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1247 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–107 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No differences in soil properties were detected between compost and composted biochar treatments.
Treatmentcomposted biochar e4 Directionno differences e4 Not reported Outcome
Verbatim
t0 “Improves Potato Growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–116 e4 “Relative to an unamended control, the high application rates tended to decrease bulk density and in crease total N in soil, but no differences were detected between the compost or composted biochar treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1340 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Floral resource abundance did not change significantly with restoration age.
TaxonConservation Reserve Program plantings t0 Outcomefloral resource abundances e0 Directiondid not change e0 Settingincreasing restoration age e1 Verbatim
e0 “floral resource abundances did not change significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1221 e1 “Despite the decrease in forb density with in creasing restoration age, floral resource abundances did not change significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1221 t0 “Conservation Reserve Program plantings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–127 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.