View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic stress decrease d seedling relative water content .
osmotic stress t0 seedling relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in seedling relative water content (RWC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1153 t0 “osmotic stress resistance by improving leaf photosynthetic physiology and antioxidant capacity in maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–144 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content decrease d slightly without significant differences.
Leaf relative water content e0 overall decrease in relative water content was small e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Leaf relative water content and SPAD values also decrease d, but the overall decrease in relative water content was small, and the differences were not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1002 t0 “Cd Stress on Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Maize Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–90 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress decrease d relative water content and in creased water deficit in dex in all genotypes.
relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Salt stress led to physiological drought in all maize genotypes as in dicated by the significant decrease in relative water content and in crease in water deficit in dex. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–604 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d maize relative water content .
drought condition e0 relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 t0 “Zea mays seedlings
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Exogenous Spd in hibited the decline in leaf relative water content under osmotic stress.
Exogenous Spd treatment e0 leaf relative water content e0 inhibited the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Exogenous Spd treatment not only obviously in hibited the decrease of leaf relative water content ,but also in creased the content of soluble protein. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–814 t0 “Maize Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought sharply decrease d relative water content and pigment content in maize seedlings relative to control.
Relative Water Content (RWC) e1 Sharp decrease e1 control condition e1 Verbatim
t0 “Drought in Maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–116 e1 “Sharp decrease in Relative Water Content (RWC), Chl a, Chl b, carotenoid (Car) and total pigment content was observed under drought compared to control condition, while PAs application reversed their decreasing trends ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–578 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress similarly reduced leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars.
leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salt stress caused a similar decrease in leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1089 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit significantly decrease d chlorophyll content relative to control.
stressed plant e0 chlorophyll content e0 Verbatim
e0 “The significant decrease of chlorophyll content was obtained in stressed plant than control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–804 e1 “leaves of Zea mays L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–122 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress reduced maize growth, leaf water , net photosynthesis, and quantum yield.
growth and leaf relative water content as well as net photosynthesis e0 Verbatim
e0 “Salt stress resulted in the decrease in growth and leaf relative water content as well as net photosynthesis and the apparent quantum yield of photosynthesis. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–426 t0 “Photosynthesis is improved by exogenous glycinebetaine in salt‐stressed maize plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Mild water deficits did not decrease leaf water potential, turgor potential or RWC.
mild plant water deficits e0 ψ L , ψ p , or RWC e0 without decreases e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “When mild plant water deficits were imposed, g s was significantly decrease d without decrease s in either ψ L , ψ p , or RWC ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1227 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–137 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Water loss differed by a factor of two to three across humidity conditions.
>95% relative humidity e1 amount of water lost e0 Verbatim
e0 “the amount of water lost by the plants under these conditions differed by a factor 2 to 3 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–377 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays