View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Kernel dry and fresh weight tended to decrease as NAA concentration in creased.
TreatmentNAA concentration e0 Outcomedry weight and fresh weight of the kernel e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “kernel abortion rate tended to in crease with the growth of NAA concentration,but the dry weight and fresh weight of the kernel tended to decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–298 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower radiation decrease d root dry weight ratio.
Outcomeratio of root dry weight (RWR) to whole plant dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in ratio of root dry weight (RWR) to whole plant dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–941 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease maize fresh or dry weight .
Treatment>95% relative humidity e1 Outcomegrowth (fresh weight and dry weight) e0 Directionneither a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Root dry weight of chilling-tolerant maize hybrids did not decrease .
Materialmaize hybrids with chilling tolerance e0 Outcomedry weight of root e0 Directiondidn't decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The results show that the dry weight of root of maize hybrids with chilling tolerance didn't decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–469 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Kernel dry weight subsequently decrease d as hidden loss.
Verbatim
e0 “After that, there was even a decrease in dry weight which was called hidden loss ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1202 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The percentage decrease in dry weight was lowest for ZD958, in termediate for ND108, and highest for GY115.
Outcomedecrease percentage e0 Qualifierthen in ND108 and the highest in GY115 e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease percentage showed to be the lowest in ZD958,then in ND108 and the highest in GY115. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–794 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in maize dry weight was comparable with the decrease in plant height and leaf area.
Outcomedecrease in dry weight e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Comparatorplant height and leaf area e1 Verbatim
t0 “Maize(Zea mays ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 e1 “the decrease in dry weight was comparable with plant height and leaf area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1352 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each unit decrease in radiation reduced root dry weight by 0.1938 g m−2.
Treatmentdecrease in solar radiation e0 Verbatim
e0 “for every 1‐MJ m −2 decrease in solar radiation, the root dry weight , shoot dry weight , and root/shoot ratio decrease d by 0.1938 g m −2 , 1.3517 g m −2 , and 0.0103 × 10 −2 , respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1067 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each unit decrease in radiation reduced shoot dry weight by 1.3517 g m−2.
Treatmentdecrease in solar radiation e0 Outcomeshoot dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “for every 1‐MJ m −2 decrease in solar radiation, the root dry weight , shoot dry weight , and root/shoot ratio decrease d by 0.1938 g m −2 , 1.3517 g m −2 , and 0.0103 × 10 −2 , respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1067 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in stalk dry weight was attributed to soluble carbohydrate remobilization toward the ear.
Qualifiera remobilization towards the ear of soluble carbohydrates stored temporarily in the stalk e0 Verbatim
e0 “This decrease was attributed to a remobilization towards the ear of soluble carbohydrates stored temporarily in the stalk ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–339 e1 “several corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–151 Other claims from this paper (1) Mechanism observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low photosynthesis rates hampered maize dry weight accumulation, which decrease d by 8.00% -74.43%.
Outcomeaccumulation of plant dry weight e0 Qualifierlow of photosynthesis rates e0 Verbatim
e0 “The low of photosynthesis rates resulted in the accumulation of plant dry weight was hampered, and there was a decrease of 8.00% -74.43%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1434 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 Other claims from this paper (14) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High-concentration Ethephon changed hormone content, which the authors give as the main reason for lower grain-filling rate, dry matter accumulation and thousand seed weight .
Treatmentspraying high concentration of Ethephon e3 Outcomegrain-filling rate,dry matter accumulation and thousand seed weight e3 Verbatim
t0 “Summer Corn Seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–67 e3 “Compared with the production,the accumulation of dry matter and the content of the hormone,spraying high concentration of Ethephon which resulted in the change of content of hormone is the important reason of the decrease of grain-filling rate, dry matter accumulation and thousand seed weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–912 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.