View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
IRGA did not significantly decrease net photosynthesis at the tested moisture range.
Outcomenet photosynthesis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “did not cause a significant decrease in net photosynthesis within this range ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1478 e1 “The drying effect of the IRGA process ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1136 e2 “Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis did not decrease through 87 moles per cubic meter NaCl under optimal assay conditions.
TreatmentNaCl concentrations up to 87 moles per cubic meter e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “leaves of cowpea (Vigna unquiculata [L.] Walp.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–68 e1 “No decrease in photosynthesis was obtained for NaCl concentrations up to 87 moles per cubic meter in the plant growing media ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–624 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Other native species had no significant decrease in net photosynthesis under water deficit.
Taxoncaatinga native species t0 Outcomenet photosynthesis e0 Directiondid not suffer significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “caatinga native species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–40 e0 “The other species can be considered more tolerant to drought, since net photosynthesis did not suffer significant decrease despite the harmful effects of water deficit on transpiration and stomatal conductance. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1056 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in photosynthesis did not have a corresponding decrease in transpiration rate.
TaxonSangiovese Grapevine t0 Outcometranspiration rate e0 Verbatim
t0 “Sangiovese Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 e0 “A corresponding reduction in the transpiration rate was not observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–747 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No lower limit for photosynthesis is evident in the absorption spectra; some experiments down to 300 nm showed no decrease in absorption.
Outcomelower limit for photosynthesis e5 Verbatim
e1 “The spectrum of a Fuchsia leaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–765 e5 “No evidence, however, is to be seen of a lower limit for photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1513 e6 “some experiments down to 300 nm still did not show a decrease of the absorption ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1607 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Infection did not decrease photosynthesis in any fifth leaves versus controls.
Organ / stagefifth leaves e0 InteractorErysiphe graminis D.c. ex Merat f. sp. avenae MarchalBlumeria avenae t0 pathogen Outcomerate of photosynthesis e1 Verbatim
e0 “no decrease in any of the fifth leaves relative to controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–493 e1 “rate of photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–383 t0 “oats exhibiting different levels of partial resistance to Erysiphe graminis D.c. ex Merat f. sp. avenae Marchal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–145 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Net photosynthesis showed no obvious decrease as temperature rose.
Treatmenttemperature rising e0 Outcomenet photosynthesis e0 Directionno obvious decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–92 e0 “no obvious decrease pattern in net photosynthesis appeared along with the temperature rising ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–499 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Glands did not reduce herbicide inhibition of cotton photosynthesis .
Materiallysigeneous glands e0 Outcomeinhibition of photosynthesis e0 Verbatim
e0 “The presence of lysigeneous glands did not increase atrazine tolerance by cotton or decrease the inhibition of photosynthesis by the herbicide. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–414 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in assimilation was unrelated to the magnitude of leaf reflectance of visible light.
OutcomeDecreased assimilation e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e1 “Decrease d assimilation was unrelated to the magnitude of leaf reflectance of visible light ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1362 t0 “Malbec ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in photosynthesis with age was not due to mutual shading.
Qualifiernot due to mutual shading e6 Verbatim
e6 “this decrease was not due to mutual shading ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–794 t0 “Plantago lanceolata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–40 Other claims from this paper (12) Mechanism author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The twentieth century growth decline indicates no CO2 fertilization effect on photosynthesis .
Outcomeno CO 2 fertilization effect on photosynthesis e0 Qualifierunexpected decrease in growth during the 20th century e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The unexpected decrease in growth during the 20th century indicates that the re was no CO 2 fertilization effect on photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1470 e1 “tree‐ring data from old‐growth, subalpine forests of western Canada ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–528 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Inhibition of net photosynthesis by SO2 was not the result of stomatal closure or increased respiration.
Outcomenet photosynthesis e2 Qualifiernot the result of stomata closure or of increased respiration e2 Verbatim
e0 “Fumigations of 4–7 week old seelings of Pinus silvestris , with ca 400 μg SO 2 m ‐3 for 4–5 days resulted in a decrease both in net photosynthetic rate and in the levels of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity of the primary needles ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–238 e2 “Lower concentrations, ca 200 μg SO 2 m ‐3 , for ca 6 days inhibited net photosynthesis reversibly. The effect on net photosynthesis was not the result of stomata closure or of increased respiration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–535 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.