View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Response of Corn Grain Yield to Spatial and Temporal Variability in Emergence 6 Show all 6 → Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Interactions between plant spacing variability and emergence variability were not significant for corn yield .
interactions between the two factors e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “interactions between the two factors were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1719 e1 “did not affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1656 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Corn is more responsive to plant emergence variability than to plant spacing variability .
plant emergence variability e0 more responsive e0 plant spacing variability e0 Verbatim
e0 “corn is more responsive to plant emergence variability than plant spacing variability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1550 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Only plant emergence variability significantly affected corn plant height, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation.
plant emergence variability e0 plant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter accumulation e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Only plant emergence variability significantly affected plant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter accumulation, and grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1074 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 Other claims from this paper (7) Response of Corn Grain Yield to Spatial and Temporal Variability in Emergence 4 Show all 4 → Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Emergence variability significantly affected corn height, leaf area index, dry matter accumulation, and grain yield .
plant emergence variability e0 plant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter accumulation e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Only plant emergence variability significantly affected plant height, leaf area index (LAI), dry matter accumulation, and grain yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1074 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Within-row spacing variation did not affect corn yield .
variation in within-row spacing e0 did not affect e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “variation in within-row spacing did not affect yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1655 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A two-leaf emergence delay for one of six plants reduced corn yield by 4% relative to uniform early emergence.
one out of six plants with a two-leaf stage delay in emergence e0 uniformly early emerged plants e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Compared with the uniformly early emerged plants, one out of six plants with a two-leaf stage delay in emergence reduced yield by 4% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1207 Other claims from this paper (6) Maize Temporal Yield Variability under Long‐Term Manure and Fertilizer Application: Fractal Analysis 3 Show all 3 → Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil fertility amendments did not alleviate yearly maize yield variability .
Soil fertility amendments e0 year‐to‐year variability observed in the corn ( Zea mays L.) yield e0 did not alleviate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Soil fertility amendments did not alleviate year‐to‐year variability observed in the corn ( Zea mays L.) yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1482 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield increased as nitrogen application rose without manure.
increasing N application rate e0 without manure e0 Verbatim
e0 “Grain yield increased with increasing N application rate without manure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1037 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer did not elicit a yield response where manure was applied.
fertilizer application e0 where manure had been applied e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “no response to fertilizer application was observed where manure had been applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1123 e1 “Grain yield increased with increasing N application rate without manure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1037 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 Other claims from this paper (5) SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY IN APPLES 3 Show all 3 → Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cold storage reduced flesh firmness and acidity.
flesh firmness and acidity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “APPLES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 e0 “During cold storage, flesh firmness and acidity decreased and soluble solids content increased in 'Red Chief or did not change in 'Fuji' fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1472 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cold storage raised soluble solids content in Red Chief.
soluble solids content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “APPLES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 e0 “During cold storage, flesh firmness and acidity decreased and soluble solids content increased in 'Red Chief or did not change in 'Fuji' fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1472 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cold storage did not change soluble solids content in Fuji.
soluble solids content e0 did not change e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “APPLES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 e0 “During cold storage, flesh firmness and acidity decreased and soluble solids content increased in 'Red Chief or did not change in 'Fuji' fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1472 Other claims from this paper (9) Spatial and Temporal Variability of Available Nutrient in Cotton Field at Flower and Boll Stage and Its Effect on Lint Yield and Fiber Quality 3 Show all 3 → Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 240 kg ha-1 in Nanjing, cotton yield was maximal.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “at the nitrogen application level of 360 kg ha-1 for Anyang and 240 kg ha-1 for Nanjing, yield components were the relatively optimal, yield was the maximum and the fiber quality of length and strength was better ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2247 t0 “Cotton Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At 360 kg ha-1 in Anyang, cotton yield components were relatively optimal and yield maximal.
yield components e0 relatively optimal e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “at the nitrogen application level of 360 kg ha-1 for Anyang and 240 kg ha-1 for Nanjing, yield components were the relatively optimal, yield was the maximum and the fiber quality of length and strength was better ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2247 t0 “Cotton Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
At the stated regional nitrogen levels, cotton fiber length and strength were better.
fiber quality of length and strength e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “at the nitrogen application level of 360 kg ha-1 for Anyang and 240 kg ha-1 for Nanjing, yield components were the relatively optimal, yield was the maximum and the fiber quality of length and strength was better ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2247 t0 “Cotton Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 Other claims from this paper (15) Effect of Temporal and Varietal Variability on Growth and Developmental Parameters of Brown Sarson ( Brassica rapa L. Var. Oleifera ) Under Temperate Kashmir Condition 3 Show all 3 → Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
October 1 sowing produced maximum seed yield of 17.72q ha -1.
1 st October sowing e0 15 th October and 30 th October sowing e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum seed yield i.e. 17.72q ha -1 , stover yield (56.73 q/ha)and oil yield (635.07 kg/ha)was obtained with 1 st October sowing, than 15 th October and 30 th October sowing. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–937 t0 “Brown Sarson ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
October 1 sowing produced maximum stover yield of 56.73 q/ha.
1 st October sowing e0 15 th October and 30 th October sowing e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum seed yield i.e. 17.72q ha -1 , stover yield (56.73 q/ha)and oil yield (635.07 kg/ha)was obtained with 1 st October sowing, than 15 th October and 30 th October sowing. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–937 t0 “Brown Sarson ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
October 1 sowing produced maximum oil yield of 635.07 kg/ha.
1 st October sowing e0 15 th October and 30 th October sowing e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum seed yield i.e. 17.72q ha -1 , stover yield (56.73 q/ha)and oil yield (635.07 kg/ha)was obtained with 1 st October sowing, than 15 th October and 30 th October sowing. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–937 t0 “Brown Sarson ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 Other claims from this paper (5) Seasonal interactions between spatial and temporal variability in a steep Barbera vineyard 3 Show all 3 → Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield was 62% lower in low vigor plots than in high vigor plots.
severely curtailed e1 Verbatim
t0 “steep Barbera vineyard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 e1 “Final vine size and yield were severely curtailed in LV (−49% and −62% as compared to HV, respectively) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1325 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Final vine size was 49% lower in low vigor plots than in high vigor plots.
severely curtailed e1 Verbatim
t0 “steep Barbera vineyard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 e1 “Final vine size and yield were severely curtailed in LV (−49% and −62% as compared to HV, respectively) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1325 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Low vigor plots achieved much better and more complete grape maturity than high vigor plots.
Verbatim
t0 “steep Barbera vineyard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–90 e1 “Final vine size and yield were severely curtailed in LV (−49% and −62% as compared to HV, respectively) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1325 e2 “which, on the other hand, achieved much better and complete grape maturity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1400 Other claims from this paper (11) Spatial and Temporal Variability of Available Nutrient in Cotton Field at Flower and Boll Stage and Its Effect on Lint Yield and Fiber Quality 2 Show all 2 → Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At Nanjing, 240 kg hm-2 N gave the highest lint yield and favorable yield components and fiber traits.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “安阳、南京分别以360 kg hm-2和240 kg hm-2施氮水平棉花产量构成相对合理、皮棉产量最高、纤维长度和比强度较优 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–549 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At Anyang, 360 kg hm-2 N gave the highest lint yield and favorable yield components and fiber traits.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “安阳、南京分别以360 kg hm-2和240 kg hm-2施氮水平棉花产量构成相对合理、皮棉产量最高、纤维长度和比强度较优 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–549 Other claims from this paper (14) Spatial and Temporal Variability of Spring Barley Yield and Quality Quantified by Crop Simulation Model 2 Show all 2 → Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
A rate of 120 kg N ha−1 was optimal for increasing barley grain yield while meeting malting grain nitrogen requirements.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “120 kg N ha−1 is the optimal rate to increase grain yield while still keeping within the grain N% requirements for malting quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1065 t0 “Spring Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–49 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
A rate of 120 kg N ha−1 kept barley grain nitrogen within malting quality requirements.
keeping within e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “120 kg N ha−1 is the optimal rate to increase grain yield while still keeping within the grain N% requirements for malting quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1065 t0 “Spring Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–49 Other claims from this paper (2) Effects of Fertilizers and Manures on Temporal Yield Variability of Winter Rye 2 Show all 2 → Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Manure reduced rye yield variability under Ca and CaPK.
additional manure e0 temporal yield variability of rye e0 Ca and CaPK (without mineral N) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “additional manure in ‘sub-optimal’ mineral fertilizer treatments, such as Ca and CaPK (without mineral N), reduced the temporal yield variability of rye ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1221 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Organic input increased rye yield variability under CaNPK and NPK.
additional organic input e0 variable rye yields e0 those with no additional manure e0 Verbatim
e0 “additional organic input led to more variable rye yield s in already ‘optimal’ treatments including mineral N (CaNPK and NPK), compared to those with no additional manure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1405 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
Zea mays
Gossypium hirsutum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Secale cereale