e0
“Grape vines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) were selectively shaded with polypropylene doth to separate the effects of shading fruit from the effects of shading foliage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–179

e1
“Shading the foliage led to both a delay and a decrease in berry growth. Leaf shading also affected the timing and the magnitude of sugar accumulation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–452

Title

Differential effects of shading fruit or foliage on the development and composition of grape berries

Rojas-Lara, B. A.; Morrison, Janice C. Julius Kühn-Institut 2015. doi:10.5073/vitis.1989.28.199-208

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Shading the foliage decreased berry growth.
Intervention effect Shading the foliage delayed berry growth.
Intervention effect Shading reduced total sugar per berry more than it reduced sugar concentration.
Intervention effect Rate of pre-veraison malate accumulation was lower with increasing foliage shade than in fully sun-exposed vines.
Intervention effect Maximum malate content at veraison was lower with increasing foliage shade than in fully sun-exposed vines.
Intervention effect Rate of post-veraison malate loss was highest in fully sun-exposed vines.
Intervention effect Tartaric acid was significantly lower in fruit of heavily shaded vines than in more exposed treatments.
Association Leaf shading was significantly associated with increased potassium concentration in the fruit.
Association Juice pH was more closely correlated with tartaric acid and potassium concentrations than with malate content.
Intervention effect Grapes from heavily shaded vines had the highest pH.
Intervention effect Anthocyanin accumulation was affected more by cluster shading than by leaf shading.
Intervention effect Shaded fruit had significantly less anthocyanin than sun-exposed fruit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading the foliage decreased berry growth.

Taxon: Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment: Shading the foliagee1
Outcome: berry growthe1
Direction: decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Grape vines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) were selectively shaded with polypropylene doth to separate the effects of shading fruit from the effects of shading foliage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–179

e1
“Shading the foliage led to both a delay and a decrease in berry growth. Leaf shading also affected the timing and the magnitude of sugar accumulation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–452

Title

Differential effects of shading fruit or foliage on the development and composition of grape berries

Rojas-Lara, B. A.; Morrison, Janice C. Julius Kühn-Institut 2015. doi:10.5073/vitis.1989.28.199-208

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Shading the foliage delayed berry growth.
Association Leaf shading affected the timing and magnitude of sugar accumulation in berries.
Intervention effect Shading reduced total sugar per berry more than it reduced sugar concentration.
Intervention effect Rate of pre-veraison malate accumulation was lower with increasing foliage shade than in fully sun-exposed vines.
Intervention effect Maximum malate content at veraison was lower with increasing foliage shade than in fully sun-exposed vines.
Intervention effect Rate of post-veraison malate loss was highest in fully sun-exposed vines.
Intervention effect Tartaric acid was significantly lower in fruit of heavily shaded vines than in more exposed treatments.
Association Leaf shading was significantly associated with increased potassium concentration in the fruit.
Association Juice pH was more closely correlated with tartaric acid and potassium concentrations than with malate content.
Intervention effect Grapes from heavily shaded vines had the highest pH.
Intervention effect Anthocyanin accumulation was affected more by cluster shading than by leaf shading.
Intervention effect Shaded fruit had significantly less anthocyanin than sun-exposed fruit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading the foliage delayed berry growth.

Taxon: Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment: Shading the foliagee1
Outcome: berry growthe1
Direction: delaye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Grape vines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) were selectively shaded with polypropylene doth to separate the effects of shading fruit from the effects of shading foliage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–179

e1
“Shading the foliage led to both a delay and a decrease in berry growth. Leaf shading also affected the timing and the magnitude of sugar accumulation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–452

Title

Differential effects of shading fruit or foliage on the development and composition of grape berries

Rojas-Lara, B. A.; Morrison, Janice C. Julius Kühn-Institut 2015. doi:10.5073/vitis.1989.28.199-208

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Shading the foliage decreased berry growth.
Association Leaf shading affected the timing and magnitude of sugar accumulation in berries.
Intervention effect Shading reduced total sugar per berry more than it reduced sugar concentration.
Intervention effect Rate of pre-veraison malate accumulation was lower with increasing foliage shade than in fully sun-exposed vines.
Intervention effect Maximum malate content at veraison was lower with increasing foliage shade than in fully sun-exposed vines.
Intervention effect Rate of post-veraison malate loss was highest in fully sun-exposed vines.
Intervention effect Tartaric acid was significantly lower in fruit of heavily shaded vines than in more exposed treatments.
Association Leaf shading was significantly associated with increased potassium concentration in the fruit.
Association Juice pH was more closely correlated with tartaric acid and potassium concentrations than with malate content.
Intervention effect Grapes from heavily shaded vines had the highest pH.
Intervention effect Anthocyanin accumulation was affected more by cluster shading than by leaf shading.
Intervention effect Shaded fruit had significantly less anthocyanin than sun-exposed fruit.

Warming temperature reduces the risk of pre-harvest freezing injury and modifies variety suitability in the main winegrape-growing regions of China 2

Show all 2 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The magnitude of freezing injury reduction depended on elevation.

Taxon: winegrapeVitis viniferat0
Outcome: magnitude of decreasee0
Setting: elevatione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“the magnitude of decrease was elevation dependent.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1626

t0
“winegrape”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–122

Title

Warming temperature reduces the risk of pre-harvest freezing injury and modifies variety suitability in the main winegrape-growing regions of China

Huiqing Bai; Jianqiang He; Cornelis van Leeuwen; et al. Horticulture Research 2025. doi:10.1093/hr/uhaf176

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Three temperature indices increased across six winegrape regions in the later period.
Observation First fall frost was delayed by 0–16 days in five of six regions.
Method / resource The original GSR model yielded biased harvest-date predictions.
Method / resource Recalibrated GSR model calibration performance reached R2 0.83 and NRMSE 2.8%.
Method / resource Recalibrated GSR model validation performance reached R2 0.83 and NRMSE 3.1%.
Observation Simulated harvest dates advanced by 6–30 days across six varieties and regions in P2.
Observation Freezing injury index decreased 2–60% in P2 across all regions.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Freezing injury index decreased 2–60% in P2 across all regions.

Taxon: winegrapeVitis viniferat0
Outcome: CFIe0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 2–60%e0
Setting: all regionse0

Verbatim

e0
“CFI decreased (2–60%) during P2 in all regions and the magnitude of decrease was elevation dependent.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1626

t0
“winegrape”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–122

Title

Warming temperature reduces the risk of pre-harvest freezing injury and modifies variety suitability in the main winegrape-growing regions of China

Huiqing Bai; Jianqiang He; Cornelis van Leeuwen; et al. Horticulture Research 2025. doi:10.1093/hr/uhaf176

Other claims from this paper (7)

Observation Three temperature indices increased across six winegrape regions in the later period.
Observation First fall frost was delayed by 0–16 days in five of six regions.
Method / resource The original GSR model yielded biased harvest-date predictions.
Method / resource Recalibrated GSR model calibration performance reached R2 0.83 and NRMSE 2.8%.
Method / resource Recalibrated GSR model validation performance reached R2 0.83 and NRMSE 3.1%.
Observation Simulated harvest dates advanced by 6–30 days across six varieties and regions in P2.
Association The magnitude of freezing injury reduction depended on elevation.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“magnitude of decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Differential effects of shading fruit or foliage on the development and composition of grape berries 3

Warming temperature reduces the risk of pre-harvest freezing injury and modifies variety suitability in the main winegrape-growing regions of China 2