Search claims · PlantClaims

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weighte0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 23.19%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS44e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: inferior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weighte0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 7.78%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS22 superior-grain weight decreased 10.60% under TR6.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: NS22e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Organ / stage: superior grainse0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Treatment: TR6e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Outcome: grain weighte0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Direction: decreasee0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Value: 10.60%e0 e1 e2 e3 e4
Comparator: TR4e0 e1 e2 e3 e4

Verbatim

e0
“superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1390

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

e1
“after the number of wheat rows served by a single tube increased from four (TR4, control) to six (TR6)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1039

e2
“grain weight per panicle (GWP) and AGFR of superior and inferior grains in the third wheat row (RW3) of NS22 and NS44”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1615

e3
“greater decrease in grain weight and average grain-filling rate (AGFR) of inferior grains (NS22: 23.19%, 13.97%; NS44: 7.78%, 5.86%) than the superior grains (NS22: 10.60%, 8.33%; NS44: 4.89%, 4.62%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1390

e4
“for both NS22 and NS44, the yield of TR6S was significantly higher than that of TR6 and TR6L”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2179

Title

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system

Jianguo Jing; Fu Qian; Xinyi Chang; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1368410

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS22 yield by 9.93% versus TR4.
Intervention effect TR6 reduced NS44 yield by 9.04% versus TR4.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain weight decreased 23.19% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 13.97% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain weight decreased 7.78% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 inferior-grain AGFR decreased 5.86% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS22 superior-grain AGFR decreased 8.33% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain weight decreased 4.89% under TR6.
Intervention effect NS44 superior-grain AGFR decreased 4.62% under TR6.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS22 third-row grain weight per panicle by 26.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased NS44 third-row grain weight per panicle by 8.22%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 14.05%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased superior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 10.50%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS22 by 5.09%.
Intervention effect TR6L increased inferior-grain AGFR in NS44 by 5.01%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS22 by 20.78%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased third-row grain weight per panicle in NS44 by 9.91%.
Intervention effect TR6S increased AGFR in the two cultivars.
Intervention effect TR6S yielded significantly more than TR6 and TR6L in both cultivars and had the highest economic benefit.

Effects of high night temperature on yield and agronomic traits of irrigated rice under field chamber system condition 4

Show all 4 →

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield loss in 2010DS and 2011DS was attributed to fewer spikelets per panicle.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Outcome: reduced yielde0
Qualifier: spikelets number per panicle (2010DS and 2011DS)e0

Verbatim

e0
“reduced yield which was attributed to decrease in grain weight, harvest index, grain filling (2009WS), and spikelets number per panicle (2010DS and 2011DS).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1383

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–81

Title

Effects of high night temperature on yield and agronomic traits of irrigated rice under field chamber system condition

Yunbo Zhang; Qiyuan Tang; Peng Shaobing; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2013

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Grain yield differed significantly between low and high night temperature in all experiments.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 16.7% in the first season.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 9.1% in the second season.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 9.6% in the third season.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 8.0% in the fourth season.
Mechanism Lower biomass and harvest index partly accounted for yield loss under high night temperature.
Mechanism Low night temperature produced higher total dry weight through higher crop growth rate.
Intervention effect Night warming during reproduction reduced yield.
Mechanism Yield loss under night warming was attributed to lower grain weight and harvest index.
Mechanism Yield loss in 2009WS was attributed to decreased grain filling.
Intervention effect An approximately 4-degree high versus low night temperature difference reduced mean yield 11% across four seasons.
Observation N22 was tolerant to high night temperature.
Observation PSBRc52 was tolerant to high night temperature.
Observation Swarna was tolerant to high night temperature.
Observation IR8 was tolerant to high night temperature.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield loss under night warming was attributed to lower grain weight and harvest index.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Outcome: reduced yielde0
Qualifier: decrease in grain weight, harvest indexe0

Verbatim

e0
“reduced yield which was attributed to decrease in grain weight, harvest index, grain filling (2009WS), and spikelets number per panicle (2010DS and 2011DS).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1383

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–81

Title

Effects of high night temperature on yield and agronomic traits of irrigated rice under field chamber system condition

Yunbo Zhang; Qiyuan Tang; Peng Shaobing; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2013

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Grain yield differed significantly between low and high night temperature in all experiments.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 16.7% in the first season.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 9.1% in the second season.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 9.6% in the third season.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 8.0% in the fourth season.
Mechanism Lower biomass and harvest index partly accounted for yield loss under high night temperature.
Mechanism Low night temperature produced higher total dry weight through higher crop growth rate.
Intervention effect Night warming during reproduction reduced yield.
Mechanism Yield loss in 2009WS was attributed to decreased grain filling.
Mechanism Yield loss in 2010DS and 2011DS was attributed to fewer spikelets per panicle.
Intervention effect An approximately 4-degree high versus low night temperature difference reduced mean yield 11% across four seasons.
Observation N22 was tolerant to high night temperature.
Observation PSBRc52 was tolerant to high night temperature.
Observation Swarna was tolerant to high night temperature.
Observation IR8 was tolerant to high night temperature.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield loss in 2009WS was attributed to decreased grain filling.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Outcome: reduced yielde0
Qualifier: grain filling (2009WS)e0

Verbatim

e0
“reduced yield which was attributed to decrease in grain weight, harvest index, grain filling (2009WS), and spikelets number per panicle (2010DS and 2011DS).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1383

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–81

Title

Effects of high night temperature on yield and agronomic traits of irrigated rice under field chamber system condition

Yunbo Zhang; Qiyuan Tang; Peng Shaobing; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2013

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Grain yield differed significantly between low and high night temperature in all experiments.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 16.7% in the first season.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 9.1% in the second season.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 9.6% in the third season.
Intervention effect High night temperature decreased grain yield by 8.0% in the fourth season.
Mechanism Lower biomass and harvest index partly accounted for yield loss under high night temperature.
Mechanism Low night temperature produced higher total dry weight through higher crop growth rate.
Intervention effect Night warming during reproduction reduced yield.
Mechanism Yield loss under night warming was attributed to lower grain weight and harvest index.
Mechanism Yield loss in 2010DS and 2011DS was attributed to fewer spikelets per panicle.
Intervention effect An approximately 4-degree high versus low night temperature difference reduced mean yield 11% across four seasons.
Observation N22 was tolerant to high night temperature.
Observation PSBRc52 was tolerant to high night temperature.
Observation Swarna was tolerant to high night temperature.
Observation IR8 was tolerant to high night temperature.

Effect of Leaf Clipping on Yield Attributes of Modern and Local Rice Varieties 4

Show all 4 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf with 2nd leaf cutting reduced grain weight per panicle in Terebaile by 48.98%.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Material: Terebailee5
Organ / stage: paniclee5
Treatment: flag leaf with 2nd leafe6
Outcome: grain weight panicle-1e5
Direction: decreaseinferrede6
Value: 48.98%e6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Modern and Local Rice Varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78

e5
“In Terebaile, only flag leaf cut showed non-significant impact on grain number panicle-1 and grain weight panicle-1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–961

e6
“Profound impact was observed by cutting flag leaf with 2nd leaf (55.47 and 48.98%, respectively) and flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf (58.96 and 63.13%, respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1128

Title

Effect of Leaf Clipping on Yield Attributes of Modern and Local Rice Varieties

SR Das; MY Ali; MM Islam Bangladesh Rice Journal 2018. doi:10.3329/brj.v21i1.37391

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Flag leaf cutting alone reduced grain number per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 35.14%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd leaf cutting reduced grain number per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 62.62%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf cutting reduced grain number per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 51.83%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf cutting alone reduced grain weight per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 29.18%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd leaf cutting reduced grain weight per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 58.37%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf cutting reduced grain weight per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 48.93%.
Intervention effect Cutting the 2nd leaf alone had no significant effect on yield attributes of Binadhan-8 compared with control.
Intervention effect Cutting the 3rd leaf alone had no significant effect on yield attributes of Binadhan-8 compared with control.
Association The number of unfilled grains increased with higher intensity of leaf cutting.
Intervention effect Flag leaf cutting alone had non-significant impact on grain number and grain weight per panicle in Terebaile.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd leaf cutting reduced grain number per panicle in Terebaile by 55.47%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf cutting reduced grain number per panicle in Terebaile by 58.96%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf cutting reduced grain weight per panicle in Terebaile by 63.13%.
Intervention effect Leaf clipping had no significant effect on thousand grain weight of Binadhan-8.
Intervention effect Leaf clipping had a significant effect on thousand grain weight of Terebaile.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf cutting reduced grain weight per panicle in Terebaile by 63.13%.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Material: Terebailee5
Organ / stage: paniclee5
Treatment: flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leafe6
Outcome: grain weight panicle-1e5
Direction: decreaseinferrede6
Value: 63.13%e6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Modern and Local Rice Varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78

e5
“In Terebaile, only flag leaf cut showed non-significant impact on grain number panicle-1 and grain weight panicle-1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–961

e6
“Profound impact was observed by cutting flag leaf with 2nd leaf (55.47 and 48.98%, respectively) and flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf (58.96 and 63.13%, respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1128

Title

Effect of Leaf Clipping on Yield Attributes of Modern and Local Rice Varieties

SR Das; MY Ali; MM Islam Bangladesh Rice Journal 2018. doi:10.3329/brj.v21i1.37391

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Flag leaf cutting alone reduced grain number per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 35.14%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd leaf cutting reduced grain number per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 62.62%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf cutting reduced grain number per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 51.83%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf cutting alone reduced grain weight per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 29.18%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd leaf cutting reduced grain weight per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 58.37%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf cutting reduced grain weight per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 48.93%.
Intervention effect Cutting the 2nd leaf alone had no significant effect on yield attributes of Binadhan-8 compared with control.
Intervention effect Cutting the 3rd leaf alone had no significant effect on yield attributes of Binadhan-8 compared with control.
Association The number of unfilled grains increased with higher intensity of leaf cutting.
Intervention effect Flag leaf cutting alone had non-significant impact on grain number and grain weight per panicle in Terebaile.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd leaf cutting reduced grain number per panicle in Terebaile by 55.47%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd leaf cutting reduced grain weight per panicle in Terebaile by 48.98%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf cutting reduced grain number per panicle in Terebaile by 58.96%.
Intervention effect Leaf clipping had no significant effect on thousand grain weight of Binadhan-8.
Intervention effect Leaf clipping had a significant effect on thousand grain weight of Terebaile.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf with 2nd leaf cutting reduced grain number per panicle in Terebaile by 55.47%.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Material: Terebailee5
Organ / stage: paniclee5
Treatment: flag leaf with 2nd leafe6
Outcome: grain number panicle-1e5
Direction: decreaseinferrede6
Value: 55.47e6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Modern and Local Rice Varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–78

e5
“In Terebaile, only flag leaf cut showed non-significant impact on grain number panicle-1 and grain weight panicle-1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–961

e6
“Profound impact was observed by cutting flag leaf with 2nd leaf (55.47 and 48.98%, respectively) and flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf (58.96 and 63.13%, respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1128

Title

Effect of Leaf Clipping on Yield Attributes of Modern and Local Rice Varieties

SR Das; MY Ali; MM Islam Bangladesh Rice Journal 2018. doi:10.3329/brj.v21i1.37391

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Flag leaf cutting alone reduced grain number per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 35.14%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd leaf cutting reduced grain number per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 62.62%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf cutting reduced grain number per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 51.83%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf cutting alone reduced grain weight per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 29.18%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd leaf cutting reduced grain weight per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 58.37%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf cutting reduced grain weight per panicle in Binadhan-8 by 48.93%.
Intervention effect Cutting the 2nd leaf alone had no significant effect on yield attributes of Binadhan-8 compared with control.
Intervention effect Cutting the 3rd leaf alone had no significant effect on yield attributes of Binadhan-8 compared with control.
Association The number of unfilled grains increased with higher intensity of leaf cutting.
Intervention effect Flag leaf cutting alone had non-significant impact on grain number and grain weight per panicle in Terebaile.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd leaf cutting reduced grain weight per panicle in Terebaile by 48.98%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf cutting reduced grain number per panicle in Terebaile by 58.96%.
Intervention effect Flag leaf with 2nd and 3rd leaf cutting reduced grain weight per panicle in Terebaile by 63.13%.
Intervention effect Leaf clipping had no significant effect on thousand grain weight of Binadhan-8.
Intervention effect Leaf clipping had a significant effect on thousand grain weight of Terebaile.

Planting Date and Genotype Effect On Morpho-agronomic Traits of Burkina Faso Sweet Grain Sorghum 4

Show all 4 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing decreased panicle weight by 16.84%.

Taxon: sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment: Delayed sowinge0
Outcome: panicle weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 16.84%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Delayed sowing also resulted in a decrease in plant height (66.4 cm), 100 grain weight (8.3%), panicle weight (16.84%) and grain yield per plant (18.93%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–842

t0
“Sorghum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96

Title

Planting Date and Genotype Effect On Morpho-agronomic Traits of Burkina Faso Sweet Grain Sorghum

Wendmanegda Hermann Tondé; Nerbéwendé Sawadogo; Josiane Tiendrébéogo; et al. Plant Science Today 2023. doi:10.14719/pst.2208

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Sowing date significantly affected most measured sorghum traits.
Intervention effect Internode length was an exception to the sowing date effect.
Intervention effect At the second planting date, sorghum sowing-to-flowering cycle shortened by 08 to 20 days.
Intervention effect Delayed sowing decreased plant height by 66.4 cm.
Intervention effect Delayed sowing decreased 100 grain weight by 8.3%.
Intervention effect Delayed sowing decreased grain yield per plant by 18.93%.
Observation Genotypes differed in photoperiod sensitivity with mean coefficient 0.59.
Observation All genotypes flowered between September 11 and 27 under both sowing dates.
Recommendation The results could inform the sweet sorghum breeding cropping calendar.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing decreased grain yield per plant by 18.93%.

Taxon: sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment: Delayed sowinge0
Outcome: grain yield per plante0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 18.93%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Delayed sowing also resulted in a decrease in plant height (66.4 cm), 100 grain weight (8.3%), panicle weight (16.84%) and grain yield per plant (18.93%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–842

t0
“Sorghum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96

Title

Planting Date and Genotype Effect On Morpho-agronomic Traits of Burkina Faso Sweet Grain Sorghum

Wendmanegda Hermann Tondé; Nerbéwendé Sawadogo; Josiane Tiendrébéogo; et al. Plant Science Today 2023. doi:10.14719/pst.2208

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Sowing date significantly affected most measured sorghum traits.
Intervention effect Internode length was an exception to the sowing date effect.
Intervention effect At the second planting date, sorghum sowing-to-flowering cycle shortened by 08 to 20 days.
Intervention effect Delayed sowing decreased plant height by 66.4 cm.
Intervention effect Delayed sowing decreased 100 grain weight by 8.3%.
Intervention effect Delayed sowing decreased panicle weight by 16.84%.
Observation Genotypes differed in photoperiod sensitivity with mean coefficient 0.59.
Observation All genotypes flowered between September 11 and 27 under both sowing dates.
Recommendation The results could inform the sweet sorghum breeding cropping calendar.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing decreased 100 grain weight by 8.3%.

Taxon: sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment: Delayed sowinge0
Outcome: 100 grain weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 8.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Delayed sowing also resulted in a decrease in plant height (66.4 cm), 100 grain weight (8.3%), panicle weight (16.84%) and grain yield per plant (18.93%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–842

t0
“Sorghum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96

Title

Planting Date and Genotype Effect On Morpho-agronomic Traits of Burkina Faso Sweet Grain Sorghum

Wendmanegda Hermann Tondé; Nerbéwendé Sawadogo; Josiane Tiendrébéogo; et al. Plant Science Today 2023. doi:10.14719/pst.2208

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Sowing date significantly affected most measured sorghum traits.
Intervention effect Internode length was an exception to the sowing date effect.
Intervention effect At the second planting date, sorghum sowing-to-flowering cycle shortened by 08 to 20 days.
Intervention effect Delayed sowing decreased plant height by 66.4 cm.
Intervention effect Delayed sowing decreased panicle weight by 16.84%.
Intervention effect Delayed sowing decreased grain yield per plant by 18.93%.
Observation Genotypes differed in photoperiod sensitivity with mean coefficient 0.59.
Observation All genotypes flowered between September 11 and 27 under both sowing dates.
Recommendation The results could inform the sweet sorghum breeding cropping calendar.

Changes in Agronomic Traits of Indica Hybrid Rice during Genetic Improvement 3

Show all 3 →

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield per plant of indica hybrid rice decreased during 30 years of genetic improvement.

Taxon: Indica Hybrid Ricet0
Outcome: grain yielde1
Direction: decreasee1

Verbatim

t0
“Changes in Agronomic Traits of Indica Hybrid Rice during Genetic Improvement”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76

e1
“During the 30 years of genetic improvement,the effective panicle number per plant was progressively decreased,which caused the decrease of grain yield and biomass per plant of hybrid rice combinations in spite of the slightly increased plant height,1000-grain weight and number of grains per panicle”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–745

Title

Changes in Agronomic Traits of Indica Hybrid Rice during Genetic Improvement

Danying Wang; Chunmei Xu; Yuan Mao Jiang; et al. Zhongguo shuidao kexue 2010

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective panicle number per plant of indica hybrid rice progressively decreased during 30 years of genetic improvement.

Taxon: Indica Hybrid Ricet0
Outcome: effective panicle number per plante1
Direction: progressively decreasede1

Verbatim

t0
“Changes in Agronomic Traits of Indica Hybrid Rice during Genetic Improvement”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76

e1
“During the 30 years of genetic improvement,the effective panicle number per plant was progressively decreased,which caused the decrease of grain yield and biomass per plant of hybrid rice combinations in spite of the slightly increased plant height,1000-grain weight and number of grains per panicle”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–745

Title

Changes in Agronomic Traits of Indica Hybrid Rice during Genetic Improvement

Danying Wang; Chunmei Xu; Yuan Mao Jiang; et al. Zhongguo shuidao kexue 2010

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass per plant of indica hybrid rice decreased during 30 years of genetic improvement.

Taxon: Indica Hybrid Ricet0
Outcome: biomass per plante1
Direction: decreasee1

Verbatim

t0
“Changes in Agronomic Traits of Indica Hybrid Rice during Genetic Improvement”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76

e1
“During the 30 years of genetic improvement,the effective panicle number per plant was progressively decreased,which caused the decrease of grain yield and biomass per plant of hybrid rice combinations in spite of the slightly increased plant height,1000-grain weight and number of grains per panicle”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–745

Title

Changes in Agronomic Traits of Indica Hybrid Rice during Genetic Improvement

Danying Wang; Chunmei Xu; Yuan Mao Jiang; et al. Zhongguo shuidao kexue 2010

Other claims from this paper (11)

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF ELEVATED CO2 ON BIOEFFICACY OF BUPROFEZIN INSECTICIDE AGAINST BROWN PLANT HOPPER, Nilaparvata lugens (STÅL) 3

Show all 3 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under elevated CO2, rice seed number per panicle decreased by 3.91% relative to ambient CO2.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: elevated CO2e1
Outcome: seed number per paniclee0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 3.91%e0
Comparator: ambient CO2e0

Verbatim

e0
“rice plants had more vegetative tillers (18%) and reproductive tillers (22.1%), but there was a decrease in 1000-seed weight (11.2%), seed number per panicle (3.91%), and grain yield (18.8%) in comparison to ambient CO2 grown rice plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–596

e1
“Under elevated CO2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–357

Title

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF ELEVATED CO2 ON BIOEFFICACY OF BUPROFEZIN INSECTICIDE AGAINST BROWN PLANT HOPPER, Nilaparvata lugens (STÅL)

Srinivasa N; Subhash Chander; Padala Vinod Kumar Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.18006/2021.9(1).5.11

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice vegetative tillers increased by 18% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice reproductive tillers increased by 22.1% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice 1000-seed weight decreased by 11.2% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice grain yield decreased by 18.8% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect 700 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 600 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 500 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 400 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Observation BPH population was higher in 2017 than in 2018.
Mechanism Higher canopy size under elevated CO2 could explain lower efficacy of 500 l/ha spray against BPH.
Recommendation The authors recommend revising spray volumes for effective BPH management under climate change.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under elevated CO2, rice grain yield decreased by 18.8% relative to ambient CO2.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: elevated CO2e1
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 18.8%e0
Comparator: ambient CO2e0

Verbatim

e0
“rice plants had more vegetative tillers (18%) and reproductive tillers (22.1%), but there was a decrease in 1000-seed weight (11.2%), seed number per panicle (3.91%), and grain yield (18.8%) in comparison to ambient CO2 grown rice plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–596

e1
“Under elevated CO2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–357

Title

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF ELEVATED CO2 ON BIOEFFICACY OF BUPROFEZIN INSECTICIDE AGAINST BROWN PLANT HOPPER, Nilaparvata lugens (STÅL)

Srinivasa N; Subhash Chander; Padala Vinod Kumar Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.18006/2021.9(1).5.11

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice vegetative tillers increased by 18% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice reproductive tillers increased by 22.1% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice 1000-seed weight decreased by 11.2% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice seed number per panicle decreased by 3.91% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect 700 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 600 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 500 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 400 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Observation BPH population was higher in 2017 than in 2018.
Mechanism Higher canopy size under elevated CO2 could explain lower efficacy of 500 l/ha spray against BPH.
Recommendation The authors recommend revising spray volumes for effective BPH management under climate change.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under elevated CO2, rice 1000-seed weight decreased by 11.2% relative to ambient CO2.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: elevated CO2e1
Outcome: 1000-seed weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 11.2%e0
Comparator: ambient CO2e0

Verbatim

e0
“rice plants had more vegetative tillers (18%) and reproductive tillers (22.1%), but there was a decrease in 1000-seed weight (11.2%), seed number per panicle (3.91%), and grain yield (18.8%) in comparison to ambient CO2 grown rice plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–596

e1
“Under elevated CO2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–357

Title

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF ELEVATED CO2 ON BIOEFFICACY OF BUPROFEZIN INSECTICIDE AGAINST BROWN PLANT HOPPER, Nilaparvata lugens (STÅL)

Srinivasa N; Subhash Chander; Padala Vinod Kumar Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.18006/2021.9(1).5.11

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice vegetative tillers increased by 18% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice reproductive tillers increased by 22.1% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice seed number per panicle decreased by 3.91% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect Under elevated CO2, rice grain yield decreased by 18.8% relative to ambient CO2.
Intervention effect 700 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 600 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 500 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Intervention effect 400 l/ha spray gave higher BPH mortality at ambient than elevated CO2.
Observation BPH population was higher in 2017 than in 2018.
Mechanism Higher canopy size under elevated CO2 could explain lower efficacy of 500 l/ha spray against BPH.
Recommendation The authors recommend revising spray volumes for effective BPH management under climate change.

The decrease in panicle number is the main reason for the yield reduction of japonica rice caused by 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene stress 3

Show all 3 →

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TCB stress reduced panicles per hill, spikelets per panicle and grain filling percentage in japonica rice.

Taxon: japonica riceOryza sativa Japonica Groupt0
Treatment: TCB stresse4
Outcome: number of panicles per hill, the number of spikelets per panicle, the grain filling percentagee4
Direction: reducinge4

Verbatim

t0
“japonica rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90

e4
“TCB stress reduces the yield of japonica rice by reducing the number of panicles per hill, the number of spikelets per panicle, the grain filling percentage, and the grain weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1156

Title

The decrease in panicle number is the main reason for the yield reduction of japonica rice caused by 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene stress

Feiyu Yan; Guoliang Zhang; Le Liu; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1425945

Other claims from this paper (7)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TCB stress reduced grain weight in japonica rice.

Taxon: japonica riceOryza sativa Japonica Groupt0
Treatment: TCB stresse4
Outcome: grain weighte4
Direction: reducinge4

Verbatim

t0
“japonica rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90

e4
“TCB stress reduces the yield of japonica rice by reducing the number of panicles per hill, the number of spikelets per panicle, the grain filling percentage, and the grain weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1156

Title

The decrease in panicle number is the main reason for the yield reduction of japonica rice caused by 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene stress

Feiyu Yan; Guoliang Zhang; Le Liu; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1425945

Other claims from this paper (7)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TCB stress reduced the yield of japonica rice.

Taxon: japonica riceOryza sativa Japonica Groupt0
Treatment: TCB stresse4
Outcome: yielde4
Direction: reducese4

Verbatim

t0
“japonica rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90

e4
“TCB stress reduces the yield of japonica rice by reducing the number of panicles per hill, the number of spikelets per panicle, the grain filling percentage, and the grain weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1156

Title

The decrease in panicle number is the main reason for the yield reduction of japonica rice caused by 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene stress

Feiyu Yan; Guoliang Zhang; Le Liu; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1425945

Other claims from this paper (7)

Performance of four irrigated rice varieties under different levels of salinity stress. 2

Show all 2 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly decreased rice panicle number, panicle length and spikelets per panicle.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: increased salinity stresse0
Outcome: number of panicles, panicle length, spikelets per paniclee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“number of panicles, panicle length, spikelets per panicle, filled grain and grain weight also significantly decrease with the increased salinity stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–719

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34

Title

Performance of four irrigated rice varieties under different levels of salinity stress.

Mirza Hasanuzzaman; Masayuki Fujita; Mohammad Nazrul Islam; et al. International journal of integrative biology 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Salinity negatively influenced rice seed germination, plant height, tiller number and leaf area index in all varieties.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity significantly decreased filled grain and grain weight.
Intervention effect NaCl at 150 mM reduced grain yield by 36-50% across four rice varieties.
Observation BRRI dhan41 showed better performance under salinity stress up to an unspecified level.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly decreased filled grain and grain weight.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: increased salinity stresse0
Outcome: filled grain and grain weighte0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“number of panicles, panicle length, spikelets per panicle, filled grain and grain weight also significantly decrease with the increased salinity stress”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–719

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34

Title

Performance of four irrigated rice varieties under different levels of salinity stress.

Mirza Hasanuzzaman; Masayuki Fujita; Mohammad Nazrul Islam; et al. International journal of integrative biology 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Salinity negatively influenced rice seed germination, plant height, tiller number and leaf area index in all varieties.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity significantly decreased rice panicle number, panicle length and spikelets per panicle.
Intervention effect NaCl at 150 mM reduced grain yield by 36-50% across four rice varieties.
Observation BRRI dhan41 showed better performance under salinity stress up to an unspecified level.

Screening of parents, hybrids and their progenies for yield under salinity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). 2

Show all 2 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced 1000-grain weight by 5.95%.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: salinitye0 e1
Outcome: 1000-grain weighte0 e1
Direction: decreaseinferrede0 e1
Value: 5.95%e0 e1
Comparator: normale0 e1

Verbatim

e0
“1000-grain weight was least affected (5.95%) followed by spikelet fertility per cent (6.27), plant height (9.79%), panicle length (12.76%), panicle weight (17.22%), grain yield (30.25%), number of filled grains panicle−1(31.20%) and number of productive tillers plant−1 (61.33%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–755

t0
“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100

e1
“Eight parents along with 28 hybrids were evaluated under normal as well as saline soil conditions of Agricultural Research Station, Machilipatnam during kharif 2010 to study the effect of salinity on various yield components.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225

Title

Screening of parents, hybrids and their progenies for yield under salinity in rice (Oryza sativa L.).

M. Sudharani; P. R. Reddy; V. R. Badu; et al. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 2013

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Salinity stunted rice growth and reduced tillering, florets per panicle, spikelet fertility, and grain yield.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced spikelet fertility by 6.27%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced plant height by 9.79%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced panicle length by 12.76%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced panicle weight by 17.22%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced grain yield by 30.25%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced filled grains per panicle by 31.20%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced productive tillers per plant by 61.33%.
Observation SR26B and CSRC(S)7-1-4 were judged the best donors for saline tolerance and high yield.
Observation SR26B x CST7-1 and Swarna x CSRC(S)7-1-4 were superior hybrids under saline conditions.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced spikelet fertility by 6.27%.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: salinitye0 e1
Outcome: spikelet fertility per cente0 e1
Direction: decreaseinferrede0 e1
Value: 6.27e0 e1
Comparator: normale0 e1

Verbatim

e0
“spikelet fertility per cent (6.27), plant height (9.79%), panicle length (12.76%), panicle weight (17.22%), grain yield (30.25%), number of filled grains panicle−1(31.20%) and number of productive tillers plant−1 (61.33%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–755

t0
“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100

e1
“Eight parents along with 28 hybrids were evaluated under normal as well as saline soil conditions of Agricultural Research Station, Machilipatnam during kharif 2010 to study the effect of salinity on various yield components.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–225

Title

Screening of parents, hybrids and their progenies for yield under salinity in rice (Oryza sativa L.).

M. Sudharani; P. R. Reddy; V. R. Badu; et al. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 2013

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Salinity stunted rice growth and reduced tillering, florets per panicle, spikelet fertility, and grain yield.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced 1000-grain weight by 5.95%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced plant height by 9.79%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced panicle length by 12.76%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced panicle weight by 17.22%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced grain yield by 30.25%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced filled grains per panicle by 31.20%.
Intervention effect Salinity reduced productive tillers per plant by 61.33%.
Observation SR26B and CSRC(S)7-1-4 were judged the best donors for saline tolerance and high yield.
Observation SR26B x CST7-1 and Swarna x CSRC(S)7-1-4 were superior hybrids under saline conditions.

Effects of soil Cr concentration on growth and development and yield formation of rice 2

Show all 2 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cr treatments decreased spikelet number per panicle.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: Cr treatmentse0
Outcome: spikelet number per paniclee0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The main reason for the decrease of the yield under Cr treatments was the decrease of spikelet number per panicle and 1 000-grain weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–772

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86

Title

Effects of soil Cr concentration on growth and development and yield formation of rice

Yulong Wang Journal of Yandzhou University 2005

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Increasing soil Cr reduced rice leaf number.
Intervention effect Increasing soil Cr reduced rice plant height.
Intervention effect Increasing soil Cr postponed heading.
Intervention effect Increasing soil Cr significantly decreased grain yield.
Intervention effect Cr treatments decreased thousand grain weight.
Intervention effect Higher soil Cr decreased dry matter weight per stem at heading.
Observation Total biomass decreased significantly with increasing soil Cr.
Observation Panicle number and filled grain percentage showed no significant change.
Observation Economic coefficient showed no significant change.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cr treatments decreased thousand grain weight.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: Cr treatmentse0
Outcome: 1 000-grain weighte0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The main reason for the decrease of the yield under Cr treatments was the decrease of spikelet number per panicle and 1 000-grain weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–772

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–86

Title

Effects of soil Cr concentration on growth and development and yield formation of rice

Yulong Wang Journal of Yandzhou University 2005

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Increasing soil Cr reduced rice leaf number.
Intervention effect Increasing soil Cr reduced rice plant height.
Intervention effect Increasing soil Cr postponed heading.
Intervention effect Increasing soil Cr significantly decreased grain yield.
Intervention effect Cr treatments decreased spikelet number per panicle.
Intervention effect Higher soil Cr decreased dry matter weight per stem at heading.
Observation Total biomass decreased significantly with increasing soil Cr.
Observation Panicle number and filled grain percentage showed no significant change.
Observation Economic coefficient showed no significant change.

“decrease of grain weight per panicle”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Narrowing row spacing and adding inter-block promote the grain filling and flag leaf photosynthetic rate of wheat under enlarged drip tube spacing system 10

Effects of high night temperature on yield and agronomic traits of irrigated rice under field chamber system condition 4

Effect of Leaf Clipping on Yield Attributes of Modern and Local Rice Varieties 4

Planting Date and Genotype Effect On Morpho-agronomic Traits of Burkina Faso Sweet Grain Sorghum 4

Changes in Agronomic Traits of Indica Hybrid Rice during Genetic Improvement 3

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF ELEVATED CO2 ON BIOEFFICACY OF BUPROFEZIN INSECTICIDE AGAINST BROWN PLANT HOPPER, Nilaparvata lugens (STÅL) 3

The decrease in panicle number is the main reason for the yield reduction of japonica rice caused by 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene stress 3

Performance of four irrigated rice varieties under different levels of salinity stress. 2

Screening of parents, hybrids and their progenies for yield under salinity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). 2

Effects of soil Cr concentration on growth and development and yield formation of rice 2