Search claims · PlantClaims

Influence of Imazapyr on the Control of Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with Chlorimuron, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury with the other herbicides.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: Imazapyre0
Outcome: soybean injurye0
Direction: did not increasee0
Comparator: chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyre0

Verbatim

e0
“Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury or decrease yield provided by chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyr.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1104

Title

Influence of Imazapyr on the Control of Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with Chlorimuron, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr

Dennis G. Riley; David R. Shaw Weed Science 1988. doi:10.1017/s0043174500075585

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Imazapyr alone at up to 4 g ai/ha gave little or no johnsongrass control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr alone at up to 4 g ai/ha gave little or no pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Adding imazapyr to imazethapyr or imazaquin synergistically increased johnsongrass control after eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding imazapyr to imazethapyr or imazaquin synergistically increased pitted morningglory control after eight weeks.
Observation Enhancing johnsongrass control required higher imazethapyr or imazaquin rates than enhancing pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixed with chlorimuron showed no synergistic increase in johnsongrass control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixed with chlorimuron showed no synergistic increase in pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixtures controlled johnsongrass at least as well as the next higher herbicide-alone rate.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixtures controlled pitted morningglory at least as well as the next higher herbicide-alone rate.
Intervention effect Imazapyr did not decrease soybean yield with the other herbicides.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapyr did not decrease soybean yield with the other herbicides.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: Imazapyre0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not increasee0
Comparator: chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyre0

Verbatim

e0
“Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury or decrease yield provided by chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyr.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1104

Title

Influence of Imazapyr on the Control of Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with Chlorimuron, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr

Dennis G. Riley; David R. Shaw Weed Science 1988. doi:10.1017/s0043174500075585

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Imazapyr alone at up to 4 g ai/ha gave little or no johnsongrass control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr alone at up to 4 g ai/ha gave little or no pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Adding imazapyr to imazethapyr or imazaquin synergistically increased johnsongrass control after eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding imazapyr to imazethapyr or imazaquin synergistically increased pitted morningglory control after eight weeks.
Observation Enhancing johnsongrass control required higher imazethapyr or imazaquin rates than enhancing pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixed with chlorimuron showed no synergistic increase in johnsongrass control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixed with chlorimuron showed no synergistic increase in pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixtures controlled johnsongrass at least as well as the next higher herbicide-alone rate.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixtures controlled pitted morningglory at least as well as the next higher herbicide-alone rate.
Intervention effect Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury with the other herbicides.

Chemical Management of Bidens pilosa (L.) and Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) and Seed Germination in Genetically Modified Soybean Glyphosate Tolerant 2

Show all 2 →

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean production showed no significant decrease.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome: productione0
Direction: no significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1285

Title

Chemical Management of Bidens pilosa (L.) and Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) and Seed Germination in Genetically Modified Soybean Glyphosate Tolerant

André Luiz de Souza Lacerda; Edgar Gomes Ferreira de Beauclair; João Nicanildo Bastos dos Santos American Journal of BioScience 2019. doi:10.11648/j.ajbio.20190705.11

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Bidens pilosa above 90%.
Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Euphorbia heterophylla above 90%.
Observation Soybean showed no visual injury under the tested herbicide treatments.
Observation Soybean germination showed no significant decrease.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean germination showed no significant decrease.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome: germinatione0
Direction: no significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1285

Title

Chemical Management of Bidens pilosa (L.) and Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) and Seed Germination in Genetically Modified Soybean Glyphosate Tolerant

André Luiz de Souza Lacerda; Edgar Gomes Ferreira de Beauclair; João Nicanildo Bastos dos Santos American Journal of BioScience 2019. doi:10.11648/j.ajbio.20190705.11

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Bidens pilosa above 90%.
Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Euphorbia heterophylla above 90%.
Observation Soybean showed no visual injury under the tested herbicide treatments.
Observation Soybean production showed no significant decrease.

Biochemical Aspects of the Soybean Response to Herbivory Injury by the Brown Stink Bug Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) 1

Show all 1 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injury did not change ascorbate peroxidase activity in susceptible soybean.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material: susceptible varietye0
Treatment: injurye0
Interactor: Brown Stink Bug Euschistus herosEuschistus herost0
Outcome: ascorbate peroxidasee0
Direction: no changee0

Not reportedInteractor roleComparator

Verbatim

e0
“In the susceptible variety, injury caused an increase in the activities of lipoxygenase 3 and guaiacol peroxidase, no change in ascorbate peroxidase, and a decrease in catalase.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–671

t0
“Soybean Response to Herbivory Injury by the Brown Stink Bug Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–129

Title

Biochemical Aspects of the Soybean Response to Herbivory Injury by the Brown Stink Bug Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

Renata Velozo Timbó; Marcelo Hermes-Lima; Luciano Paulino Silva; et al. PLoS ONE 2014. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109735

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Injury increased lipoxygenase 3 and guaiacol peroxidase activity in susceptible soybean.
Intervention effect Injury decreased catalase activity in susceptible soybean.
Intervention effect Injury did not alter monitored enzyme activities in resistant soybean.
Observation Both soybean varieties had 4-5% differential protein expression after 24 hours of injury.
Observation Differential proteins in the susceptible variety were related to stress, defense, and fungal infection.
Observation Protein-profile changes in the resistant variety were related to Calvin cycle enzymes.
Observation Authors interpret susceptible soybean as adapting redox metabolism and stress protein expression after injury.
Observation Authors interpret resistant soybean as mounting a defense response to the herbivore.

Development of AFLP and STS markers linked to a waterlogging tolerance in Korean soybean landraces 1

Show all 1 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant soybean lines did not change significantly in chlorophyll, glucose or MDA contents under waterlogging stress.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe2
Material: KAS150-9, KAS160-15, and KAS170-9e2
Treatment: waterlogging stresse1
Outcome: contentse1
Direction: did not change significantlye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Susceptible lines showed decrease in chlorophyll content and increase in glucose and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents under waterlogging stress, while tolerant lines did not change significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–407

e2
“Among the 400 soybean (Glycine max) landraces, we selected 3 tolerant (KAS150-9, KAS160-15, and KAS170-9) and 3 susceptible lines (KAS160-14, KAS160-20, and KAS201-6-1) by the survival percentage and injury scores”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–213

Title

Development of AFLP and STS markers linked to a waterlogging tolerance in Korean soybean landraces

S. -Y. Kang; K. J. Lee; G. -J. Lee; et al. Biologia Plantarum 2010. doi:10.1007/s10535-010-0009-z

Other claims from this paper (6)

Effect of soybean and winter wheat herbicides on oilseed radish establishment and growth 1

Show all 1 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr applied PRE in soybean did not reduce oilseed radish stand density or biomass.

Taxon: oilseed radishe0
Treatment: imazethapyr applied PREe2
Outcome: stand density and biomasse4
Direction: no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“effect of residual herbicides on oilseed radish (Raphanus sativus L.) establishment and growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–357

e2
“imazethapyr applied PRE caused 43 and 48% oilseed radish injury at 14 and 28 DAE, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–909

e4
“There was no decrease in oilseed radish stand density and biomass”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–976

Title

Effect of soybean and winter wheat herbicides on oilseed radish establishment and growth

Taïga B Cholette; Nader Soltani; David C. Hooker; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2017. doi:10.1139/cjps-2017-0023

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Residual herbicides used for broadleaf weed control in winter wheat caused less than 5% oilseed radish injury.
Intervention effect Residual herbicides used for broadleaf weed control in winter wheat did not reduce oilseed radish stand density or biomass.
Intervention effect Imazethapyr applied PRE in soybean caused 43% and 48% oilseed radish injury at 14 and 28 DAE.
Intervention effect Imazethapyr applied POST in soybean caused 47% and 59% oilseed radish injury at 14 and 28 DAE.
Intervention effect Imazethapyr applied POST in soybean decreased oilseed radish biomass by 65%.

Response of Sulfonylurea-Tolerant Soybean (Glycine max) and Selected Weed Species to Imazethapyr and Thifensulfuron Combinations 1

Show all 1 →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing the thifensulfuron rate mixed with imazethapyr at 70 g/ha did not decrease injury in STS soybean.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material: STS soybeane1
Treatment: Reducing the thifensulfuron ratee1
Outcome: injurye1
Direction: did not decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Reducing the thifensulfuron rate mixed with imazethapyr at 70 g/ha did not decrease injury in STS soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–878

Title

Response of Sulfonylurea-Tolerant Soybean (Glycine max) and Selected Weed Species to Imazethapyr and Thifensulfuron Combinations

D. M. Simpson; E. W. Stoller Weed Technology 1995. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00023885

Other claims from this paper (7)

“decrease of soybean injury”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

Influence of Imazapyr on the Control of Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with Chlorimuron, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr 2

Chemical Management of Bidens pilosa (L.) and Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) and Seed Germination in Genetically Modified Soybean Glyphosate Tolerant 2

Biochemical Aspects of the Soybean Response to Herbivory Injury by the Brown Stink Bug Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) 1

Development of AFLP and STS markers linked to a waterlogging tolerance in Korean soybean landraces 1

Effect of soybean and winter wheat herbicides on oilseed radish establishment and growth 1

Response of Sulfonylurea-Tolerant Soybean (Glycine max) and Selected Weed Species to Imazethapyr and Thifensulfuron Combinations 1