View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Hordeum vulgare ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease stomatal density in barley.
stomatal density e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease d stomatal density in tomato, but not in barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–849 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher sowing density decrease d grain number per spike.
higher sowing density e0 grain number per spike e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the higher sowing density brought about a decrease in the grain number per spike ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–664 t0 “spring barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–51 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer treatments reduced soil bulk density .
mineral and organic fertilizer e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a relative decrease in bulk density in all treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–820 e1 “mineral and organic fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–347 e2 “barley crop characteristics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–403 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing crop density decrease d grain bulk density in both years.
Increasing crop density e0 grain bulk density (kg hl−1) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “spring barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–146 e0 “In creasing crop density caused a decrease in grain bulk density (kg hl−1) both years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1325 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Late sowing significantly reduced spike density .
number of spikes/m2 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “late sown plants in dicated a significant decrease in tiller productivity as was express in a significant decrease in the number of spikes/m2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–816 t0 “BARLEY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–23 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Delayed sowing reduced barley height and tillering. Intervention effect Late sowing significantly reduced spike length, grains per spike, and thousand grain weight. Intervention effect Late sowing significantly reduced grain weight per spike. Intervention effect Late sowing adversely affected grain, straw, and biological yields. Observation Barley cultivars differed significantly in height, tillering, spike development and grain yield. Observation Giza 132 had the highest spike density, grain yield and harvest index. Observation Giza 2000 surpassed the other cultivars in plant height, grain weight per spike, and thousand grain weight. Observation Giza 2000 surpassed the other cultivars in straw and biological yields. Intervention effect Seeding rate significantly affected all growth and yield attributes. Intervention effect Increasing seeding rate reduced spike length, grains per spike and grain weight per spike. Intervention effect Increasing seeding rate reduced thousand grain weight. Intervention effect Increasing seeding rate increased grain yield through more spikes per area. Intervention effect Increasing seeding rate increased spike density. Association Sowing date interacted significantly with variety. Recommendation The authors recommend November 20 sowing, 60 kg per faddan seeding, and Giza 132 for maximum barley grain yield. Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower plant density proportionally in creased barley culm number and ear number.
Decrease in plant density e1 culm number and ear number e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Using 12 cultivars of barley, density response was in vestigated at five levels of spacing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 e1 “Decrease in plant density caused proportional in crease in vegetative growth, that is culm number and ear number ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–348 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Barley decrease d Glebionis density and cohort number.
G. coronaria ’s density, cohort numbere0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “barley considerably contributed to the decrease in G. coronaria ’s density , cohort number, total biomass accumulation and plant height ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–998 e1 “weeds in cereal crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–88 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing crop density decrease d grain protein in one year.
Increasing crop density e0 grain protein (%) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “spring barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–146 e0 “In creasing crop density caused a decrease in grain bulk density (kg hl−1) both years, and grain protein (%) and 1,000-kernel weight (g) in one year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1388 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing crop density decrease d thousand-kernel weight in one year.
Increasing crop density e0 1,000-kernel weight (g) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “spring barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 133–146 e0 “In creasing crop density caused a decrease in grain bulk density (kg hl−1) both years, and grain protein (%) and 1,000-kernel weight (g) in one year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1388 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cover cropping tended to reduce soil bulk density .
soil bulk density e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–472 e1 “The establishment of cover crop has resulted in a significantly higher soil microporosity and lower mesoporosity as well as tended to decrease the soil bulk density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1239 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0
Glebionis coronaria