View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Artificial defoliation did not reduce alfalfa leaf node development rate as much as larval feeding.
Artificial defoliation e3 rate of leaf node development e3 did not cause a comparable reduction e3 feeding of Hypera postica (Gyllenhal) larvae e0 Verbatim
e0 “The growth habit and yield response of alfalfa to the feeding of Hypera postica (Gyllenhal) larvae was measured in growth chambers at densities of 2–16 larvae/stem ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–163 e3 “Artificial defoliation did not cause a comparable reduction in the rate of leaf node development ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–607 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Restricting stem fruits to one per leaf node produced no significant difference in yield or quality of fruit.
Restricting stem fruits to oné per leaf node e7 yield or quality of fruit e7 no significant difference e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “The effect of day and night temperatures on the growth, development and yield of glasshouse cucumbers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 e7 “Restricting stem fruits to oné per leaf node produced no significant difference in either the yield or quality of fruit from plants of any of the temperature treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–2031 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Uniconazole did not affect node number or leaf growth.
number of nodes and leaf growth e0 without affecting e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Uniconazole reduced rhizome growth without affecting number of node s and leaf growth, while it promoted rooting. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–958 t0 “Cymbidium Hybrids
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–124 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cotyledon removal had no effect on the juvenile-to-adult leaf transition in Desmodium paniculatum seedlings.
Cotyledon removal e2 transition from juvenile to adult leaves e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Desmodium paniculatum
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–86 e1 “The transition from juvenile to adult leaves took place at the fourth node in seedlings derived from larger seeds and at the fifth or sixth node in those derived from smaller ones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–287 e2 “Cotyledon removal had no effect on this condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–338 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Aphid development time did not differ among wheat shading treatments.
development time e0 no differences e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there were no differences in development time or fecundity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–943 e1 “Shading was applied between either GS 31 and 39 (1st node detectable → flag leaf ligule just visible) or GS 39 and 55 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–446 e2 “grain aphid Sitobion avenae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–129 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Excising tips of a seminal and four crown roots barely influenced growth and third- leaf emergence.
excision of the root tips of a seminal root and four crown roots e0 growth of transplanted seedlings, including the emergence rate of the third leaf e0 barely influenced e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The growth of transplanted seedlings, including the emergence rate of the third leaf , was barely influenced by excision of the root tips of a seminal root and four crown roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–685 t0 “Rice Nursling Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–116 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Bud shading, leaf pluck and their combination had no effect on floral initiation compared with a control shoot
bud shading; leaf pluck; bud shading and leaf pluck e1 floral initiation e2 a fourth control shoot e1 Verbatim
t1 “Prunus persica (L.) Batsch
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–123 e0 “'Autumn Bright' nectarine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–177 e1 “Three treatments (bud shading; leaf pluck; bud shading and leaf pluck) were applied to three shoots in each canopy height on the fourth and eighth bud, in addition to a fourth control shoot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–651 e2 “The treatments at the node level had no effect on floral initiation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–883 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Aphid fecundity did not differ among wheat shading treatments.
no differences e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there were no differences in development time or fecundity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–943 e1 “Shading was applied between either GS 31 and 39 (1st node detectable → flag leaf ligule just visible) or GS 39 and 55 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–446 e2 “grain aphid Sitobion avenae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–129 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Medicago sativa
Cucumis sativus
Cymbidium
Desmodium paniculatum
Triticum aestivum
Sitobion avenae
Oryza sativa
Prunus persica