View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Chemical weeding cost 32.86% of manual weeding .
chemical weeding e0 manual weeding e0 Verbatim
e0 “The cost of chemical weeding was only the 32.86% of manual weeding . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–656 t0 “Phyllostachys pubescens
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Use of the extender could lower weeding cost by 20%.
Not reported Taxon Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the weeding cost could be declined by 20% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–389 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Chemical weeding reduced cost by 67.0% compared with manual weeding .
chemical weeding e0 artificial weeding e0 Verbatim
e0 “Comparing to artificial weeding ,chemical weeding can save 89.3% of labour and reduce the cost by 67.0% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–594 t0 “Larix olgensis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Hand- weeding treatments reduced the benefit : cost ratio because of higher labour cost .
Hand-weeding treatments e0 benefit : cost ratio e1 higher labour cost e1 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Hand- weeding treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–772 e1 “owing to higher labour cost reduced the benefit : cost ratio ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–909 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation The major weeds in the transplanted rice field were Echinochloa colonum , Echinochloa crus-galli , Cyperus rotundus , Cyperus difformis , Fimbristylis miliacea and Ludwigia parviflora. Intervention effect Almix + 2,4-DEE applied 8 days after transplanting was the most effective treatment for controlling weeds in transplanted rice. Intervention effect Almix + 2,4-DEE applied 8 days after transplanting maximized rice grain yield at 58.3 q/ha. Intervention effect The Almix + 2,4-DEE treatment was on a par with three rounds of hand-weeding at 20, 40 and 60 days. Intervention effect The Almix + 2,4-DEE treatment recorded the highest net return, Rs 46,392. Intervention effect The Almix + 2,4-DEE treatment recorded the highest benefit : cost ratio, 3.9. Intervention effect Hand-weeding treatments significantly reduced weed biomass. Intervention effect Hand-weeding treatments improved rice grain yield. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mechanical weeding drastically reduced cultivation cost .
mechanical weeding e0 cost of cultivation e0 drastically reduced e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The cost of cultivation was drastically reduced by mechanical weeding . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1499 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Herbicides were more cost effective than mechanical weeding .
mechanical weeding e0 Verbatim
e0 “Use of herbicides was more cost -effective than mechanical weeding ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1316 e1 “sorghum 1000 grain weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1393 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
T2 reduced weeding cost by 34.9% relative to hand weeding .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The weeding cost was reduced by 34.9, 53.9 and 49.65 per cent in T2, T3 and T4, respectively as compared to T1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–910 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
T3 reduced weeding cost by 53.9% relative to hand weeding .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The weeding cost was reduced by 34.9, 53.9 and 49.65 per cent in T2, T3 and T4, respectively as compared to T1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–910 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
T4 reduced weeding cost by 49.65% relative to hand weeding .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The weeding cost was reduced by 34.9, 53.9 and 49.65 per cent in T2, T3 and T4, respectively as compared to T1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–910 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Weeder operation cost ₹ 2 509 compared with ₹ 5 688/ha for manual weeding .
weeding by weeders e0 cost of (single) weeding e0 ₹ 2 509 against ₹ 5 688/ha e0 manual weeding e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Average cost of (single) weeding by weeders was ₹ 2 509 against ₹ 5 688/ha of manual weeding ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1161 t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–125 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Phyllostachys edulis
Larix gmelinii var. olgensis
Gossypium hirsutum
Sorghum
Oryza sativa