View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed-free hand weeding was uneconomic because of high weeding cost .
not found economic e0 high weeding cost e0 Verbatim
e0 “was not found economic due to high weeding cost ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–709 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Chemical weeding cost 32.86% of manual weeding .
chemical weeding e0 manual weeding e0 Verbatim
e0 “The cost of chemical weeding was only the 32.86% of manual weeding . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–656 t0 “Phyllostachys pubescens
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–89 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Double end hoe and Gudru had the highest weeding cost .
Verbatim
e0 “their cost of weeding was highest. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–826 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Weeding cost was 572 for two-row weeding .
Verbatim
e0 “Finger millet (Eleusine coracana ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 e1 “cost of weeding ( 572 & 447.42 ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–856 e2 “2 rows and 4 rows weeding condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–640 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Weeding cost was 447.42 for four-row weeding .
Verbatim
e0 “Finger millet (Eleusine coracana ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 e1 “cost of weeding ( 572 & 447.42 ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–856 e2 “2 rows and 4 rows weeding condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–640 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Use of the extender could lower weeding cost by 20%.
Not reported Taxon Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the weeding cost could be declined by 20% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–389 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Chemical weeding reduced cost by 67.0% compared with manual weeding .
chemical weeding e0 artificial weeding e0 Verbatim
e0 “Comparing to artificial weeding ,chemical weeding can save 89.3% of labour and reduce the cost by 67.0% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–594 t0 “Larix olgensis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Engine weeding cost 758 ETB/ha versus 1920 ETB/ha for traditional weeding .
cost of weeding per hectare e0 traditional weeding methods e0 Verbatim
e0 “cost of weeding per hectare were 758 and 1920 ETB/ha for engine-operated weeders and traditional weeding methods, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1695–1821 e1 “wheat crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–49 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The high cost of frequent weeding in the hand- weeding plot (T14) reduced its net return and benefit- cost ratio.
frequent weeding in the hand-weeding plot (T14) e6 net return and benefit-cost ratio e6 Verbatim
t0 “Comparative study on the effectiveness and cost -effectiveness of herbicides in controlling weeds in Lathyrus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108 e6 “the high cost of cultivation due to frequent weeding in the hand- weeding plot (T14) reduced its net return and benefit- cost ratio ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–958 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Engine-operated weeding cost 758 ETB/ha versus 1920 ETB/ha for traditional weeding .
cost of weeding per hectare e0 traditional weeding methods e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The cost of weeding per hectare were 758 and 1920 ETB/ha for engine-operated weeders and traditional weeding methods, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1814 e1 “in wheat crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–692 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Glycine maxt0
Phyllostachys edulis
Zea mays
Eleusine coracana
Larix gmelinii var. olgensis
Triticum aestivum
Lathyrus