View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Plot size influenced wheat yield prediction accuracy.
yield prediction accuracies e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the plot size would influence yield prediction accuracies ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–1868 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The optimum plot size for evaluating yield in papaya was four plants per plot with four replications, assuming 30% precision.
optimum plot size for the evaluation of yield e0 four plants by plot e0 30% of the precision e0 Verbatim
t0 “papaya ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 e0 “the optimum plot size for the evaluation of yield in papaya was four plants by plot with four replications each assuming 30% of the precision ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–855 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
F2 hill- plot yield was a best predictor of F4 hill- plot yield (phenotypic correlation 0.35).
best predictors of F4 hill-plot yield e4 Verbatim
t0 “The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill- plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 e4 “The best predictors of F4 hill- plot yield were mid-parent, F2 and F3 mean hill- plot yield with phenotypic correlations of 0- 26¦ 0.17, 0.3510 -03 and 0.44¦ 0.06 respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1024 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Multivariate linear regression was suitable for plot yield prediction.
suitable for plot-yield prediction e0 multi-variate linear regression e0 Verbatim
e0 “multi-variate linear regression was suitable for plot - yield prediction ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1176 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–56 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
F3 hill- plot yield was a best predictor of F4 hill- plot yield (phenotypic correlation 0.44).
best predictors of F4 hill-plot yield e4 Verbatim
t0 “The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill- plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 e4 “The best predictors of F4 hill- plot yield were mid-parent, F2 and F3 mean hill- plot yield with phenotypic correlations of 0- 26¦ 0.17, 0.3510 -03 and 0.44¦ 0.06 respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1024 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Spatial correlation modeling and plot covariates improved yield predictions.
Modeling spatial correlation and including plot covariates e0 yield predictions e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “Modeling spatial correlation and including plot covariates improved yield predictions. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1158 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mid-parent, F2 and F3 hill- plot yield predicted F4 hill- plot yield at least as well as dry matter and harvest index.
prediction of F4 hill-plot yield e0 equivalent to or better than e0 dry matter and harvest index e0 Verbatim
t0 “The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill- plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 e0 “Mid-parent, F2 and F3 hill- plot yield was equivalent to or better than dry matter and harvest index for the prediction of F4 hill- plot yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–687 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mid-parent hill- plot yield was a best predictor of F4 hill- plot yield (phenotypic correlation 0.26).
best predictors of F4 hill-plot yield e4 Verbatim
t0 “The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill- plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 e4 “The best predictors of F4 hill- plot yield were mid-parent, F2 and F3 mean hill- plot yield with phenotypic correlations of 0- 26¦ 0.17, 0.3510 -03 and 0.44¦ 0.06 respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1024 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Optimum plot size for snap bean yield evaluations at these locations was estimated.
Optimum plot size e1 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e1 “Optimum plot size for snap bean yield evaluations at these locations under the various conditions imposed were estimated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1275 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The trial provides plot -level grain yield records for 1925 to 1993.
Verbatim
e0 “Grain yield : for each plot from 1925 to 1993 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–101 Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
_-_DPLA_-_55200ec009622d7d42349f3583df310e.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Carica papaya
Glycine max