View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Corn had significantly less temporal yield variability than soybean or sorghum.
Outcometemporal yield variability e0 Comparatorsoybean or sorghum e0 Verbatim
e0 “Corn had significantly less temporal yield variability than soybean or sorghum. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1295 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Temporal soybean yield variability was 20–22%.
Outcomesoybean yield variability e7 Verbatim
e7 “Spatial and temporal soybean yield variability was 16–26% and 20–22%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2005–2087 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum temporal yield variability was 14.7% between 2014 and 2017.
OutcomeMaximum temporal variability e0 Qualifierbetween the year 2014 and 2017 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum temporal variability (14.7 %) was observed between the year 2014 and 2017. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–832 t0 “Paddy Crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–42 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spatial and temporal cotton yield variability differed among fields.
Outcomespatial and temporal yield variability e1 Qualifiervaried with the field e1 SettingSouthern High Plains t0 Verbatim
t0 “Irrigated Cotton Yield in the Southern High Plains ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–81 e1 “The amount and pattern of spatial and temporal yield variability varied with the field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–791 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Temporal variability dominated spatial variability in the study.
OutcomeTemporal variability e0 Directionmuch more dominant e0 Comparatorspatial variability e0 Verbatim
e0 “Temporal variability was much more dominant than spatial variability in this study. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1524 t0 “Crop Sequences ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Maximum temporal yield variability in paddy was 14.7%, observed between 2014 and 2017.
Outcometemporal variability e3 Qualifierbetween the year 2014 and 2017 e3 Verbatim
e0 “assess yield variability of paddy crop using automatic yield monitoring (AYM) system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–109 e3 “Maximum temporal variability (14.7 %) was observed between the year 2014 and 2017 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–831 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spatial variability was below temporal variability and frequently below 1 mm.
OutcomeSpatial variability e0 Verbatim
e0 “Spatial variability was less than temporal variability , and frequently less than 1 mm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1319 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Sugar and stalk yield response to applied nitrogen showed high spatial and temporal variability .
Outcomespatial and temporal variability in sugar and stalk yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “High spatial and temporal variability in sugar and stalk yield to applied N were observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1580 e1 “In sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–160 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The AYM system showed real-time temporal and spatial yield variability classification and quantification in paddy field.
Outcomereal-time temporal and spatial variability classification and quantification e5 Verbatim
e0 “assess yield variability of paddy crop using automatic yield monitoring (AYM) system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–109 e5 “The AYM system could show the real-time temporal and spatial variability classification and quantification in paddy field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–954 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield gaps of the four legumes showed large spatial and temporal variability across the production zones.
QualifierLarge spatial and temporal variability e3 Verbatim
e3 “Large spatial and temporal variability was observed in the yield gaps of the four legumes across the production zones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1800 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.