View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
NaCl caused a greater dry weight decrease in LU15 than DK961.
Outcomedegree of decrease e0 t0 e1 Verbatim
e0 “the degree of decrease was higher in LU15 than in DK961. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–762 t0 “Wheat Varieties DK961 and LU15 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–71 e1 “The salt-tolerant thresholds,germination percentages,germination time,photosynthetic rates and dry weight s of Dekang961(DK961) and Lumai15(LU15) were examined under NaCl stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CPZ reduced wheat seedling aboveground dry weight .
Outcomedry weight of root and upground parts e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “CPZ resulted in the decrease of dry weight of root and upground parts of wheat seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–406 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoot dry weight of wheat decrease d with each succeeding delay in seeding date.
Treatmentdelay in seeding date e1 Outcomeshoot dry weight e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “a decrease in shoot dry weight of both wheat and rye occurred with each succeeding delay in seeding date ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–948 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Omission of Ca substantially decrease d wheat top dry weight .
Directionsubstantial decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “For the wheat crop, there was substantial decrease in tops dry weight in the absence of Ca, P, and potassium (K) nutrients. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1043 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Omission of P substantially decrease d wheat top dry weight .
Directionsubstantial decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “For the wheat crop, there was substantial decrease in tops dry weight in the absence of Ca, P, and potassium (K) nutrients. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1043 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Genotype LU-26s had the best performance under drought, with the smallest decrease in plant height, tiller number and shoot dry weight .
Outcomebest performance under drought condition e3 Qualifierminimum decrease in the growth parameters i.e., plant height, number of tillers and shoot dry weight e3 Verbatim
t0 “drought tolerant wheat genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–59 e3 “The genotypes LU-26s was found to have best performance under drought condition, with minimum decrease in the growth parameters i.e., plant height, number of tillers and shoot dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1035 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing salinity decrease d wheat stem length, shoot and root dry weight , root to shoot weight ratio and biomass.
Outcomestem length, shoot and root dry weight e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in stem length, shoot and root dry weight , root to shoot dry weight ratio and total biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1060 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–160 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thousand-grain dry weight decrease d significantly.
Outcome1000-grain dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a significant decrease of 1000-grain dry weight (2.23% and 6.34%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1129 t0 “spring wheat to elevated CO2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Omission of potassium (K) substantially decrease d wheat top dry weight .
Directionsubstantial decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “For the wheat crop, there was substantial decrease in tops dry weight in the absence of Ca, P, and potassium (K) nutrients. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1043 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity reduced wheat dry weight by 19.2%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the dry weight , by 19.2%, due to the influence of salinity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–900 e1 “some traits recorded a significant decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–751 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.