Search claims · PlantClaims

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in maize dry weight was comparable with the decrease in plant height and leaf area.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome: decrease in dry weighte1
Direction: no_changeinferrede1
Comparator: plant height and leaf areae1

Verbatim

t0
“Maize(Zea mays)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64

e1
“the decrease in dry weight was comparable with plant height and leaf area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1352

Title

Responses of Different Physiological Indices for Maize(Zea mays) to Soil Water Availability

Wu Yuan 2011

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight of chilling-tolerant maize hybrids did not decrease.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Material: maize hybrids with chilling tolerancee0
Outcome: dry weight of roote0
Direction: didn't decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“The results show that the dry weight of root of maize hybrids with chilling tolerance didn't decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–469

Title

Identification of Chilling Tolerance in Maize Hybrids at Germination and Seedling Growth Stage

Zhang Hong-yin Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University 2015

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation The hybrids formed chilling-tolerant, intermediate and chilling-sensitive groups.
Observation Zhengdan 958, Jiyuan 1 and Jundan 20 were classified as chilling tolerant.
Observation Jinbei 288 and Gaoyou 1 were classified as chilling sensitive.
Observation The remaining hybrids were classified as intermediate in chilling tolerance.
Method / resource Relative shoot height and shoot and root dry weight were suitable for evaluating chilling tolerance.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity did not decrease maize fresh or dry weight.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment: >95% relative humiditye1
Outcome: growth (fresh weight and dry weight)e0
Direction: neither a decreasee0
Comparator: 50–60%e1

Verbatim

e0
“there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487

e1
“Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277

e2
“there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487

Title

Does transpiration have an essential function in long‐distance ion transport in plants?

W. TANNER; H. BEEVERS Plant Cell & Environment 1990. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1990.tb01089.x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Water loss differed by a factor of two to three across humidity conditions.
Intervention effect High humidity did not decrease maize ash content.
Intervention effect The upper shoot also showed no decrease in growth or ash content under high humidity.
Mechanism The authors suggest transpiration is not essential for long-distance mineral transport.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration decrease from FASW 1 under water deficits did not affect maize dry weight until FASW 0.75.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: water deficitse1
Outcome: dry weighte1
Direction: did not affecte1
Qualifier: until FASW = 0.75e1

Verbatim

t0
“Maize(Zea mays)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64

e1
“the decrease of transpiration from FASW = 1 in response to water deficits did not affect dry weight until FASW = 0.75”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1260

Title

Responses of Different Physiological Indices for Maize(Zea mays) to Soil Water Availability

Wu Yuan 2011

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing yellow mustard height from 10 to 20 cm did not decrease weed dry weight.

Taxon: cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
Treatment: Increasing yellow mustard height from 10 to 20 cme7
Interactor: weede7weed
Outcome: weed dry weighte7
Direction: did not decreasee7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Field experiments were conducted to determine the effect of a short-term spring-seeded smother plant on corn development and weed control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–137

e7
“Increasing yellow mustard height from 10 to 20 cm delayed corn silk emergence and reduced grain yield but did not decrease weed dry weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1076

Title

Simulation of Spring-Seeded Smother Plants for Weed Control in Corn (Zea mays)

Robert L. De Haan; Donald L. Wyse; Nancy J. Ehlke; et al. Weed Science 1994. doi:10.1017/s0043174500084125

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Yellow mustard with 4 wk interference and 10 cm height decreased corn yield by 17%.
Intervention effect Yellow mustard with 4 wk interference and 10 cm height reduced weed dry weight by an average of 66%.
Intervention effect Yellow mustard with a 2-wk interference duration did not reduce weed dry weight.
Intervention effect Yellow mustard with a 6- or 8-wk life cycle and 10 cm height reduced weed dry weight by an average of 82%.
Intervention effect Yellow mustard with a 6- or 8-wk life cycle and 10 cm height delayed corn silk emergence by an average of 5.3 days.
Intervention effect Yellow mustard with a 6- or 8-wk life cycle and 10 cm height reduced average corn grain yield by 19%.
Intervention effect Increasing yellow mustard height from 10 to 20 cm delayed corn silk emergence.
Intervention effect Increasing yellow mustard height from 10 to 20 cm reduced corn grain yield.
Intervention effect Yellow mustard with 4 wk interference and 10 cm height over the corn row at 530 seeds m-2 reduced weed dry weight by an average of 51%.
Intervention effect Yellow mustard seeded over the corn row at 530 seeds m-2 reduced average corn grain yield by 4% compared with corn in monoculture.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity did not decrease maize ash content.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment: >95% relative humiditye1
Outcome: ash contente0
Direction: neither a decreasee0
Comparator: 50–60%e1

Verbatim

e0
“there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487

e1
“Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277

e2
“there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487

Title

Does transpiration have an essential function in long‐distance ion transport in plants?

W. TANNER; H. BEEVERS Plant Cell & Environment 1990. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1990.tb01089.x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Water loss differed by a factor of two to three across humidity conditions.
Intervention effect High humidity did not decrease maize fresh or dry weight.
Intervention effect The upper shoot also showed no decrease in growth or ash content under high humidity.
Mechanism The authors suggest transpiration is not essential for long-distance mineral transport.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

XET activity per unit fresh weight did not decrease in the zone of wall tightening after osmotic stress.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse1
Outcome: XET activitye2
Qualifier: not per unit fresh weighte2

Verbatim

e1
“A series of physical and chemical analyses were made on the expanding zone of maize seedling roots grown in hydroponics”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–119

e2
“In the zone of wall tightening following osmotic stress, XET activity was decreased per unit dry weight (compared with the unstressed control), but not per unit fresh weight”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1842

Title

Xyloglucan Endotransglycosylase Activity, Microfibril Orientation and the Profiles of Cell Wall Properties Along Growing Regions of Maize Roots

JEREMY PRITCHARD; P RICHARD HETHERINGTON; STEPHEN C. FRY; et al. Journal of Experimental Botany 1993. doi:10.1093/jxb/44.8.1281

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter or leaf area index of maize.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD)e0
Outcome: chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI)e0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0
Setting: Middle Delta Conditions of Egyptt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103

e0
“Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573

Title

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt

O. S. Abu-Grab; Seham M. M. Ahmed; M. A. M. EL-Ghonemy Journal of Plant Production 2019. doi:10.21608/jpp.2019.62278

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 65% AVSMD did not significantly decrease kernels per row, 100-kernel weight or grain yield of maize.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD)e0
Outcome: kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yielde0
Direction: did not significantly decreasee0
Setting: Middle Delta Conditions of Egyptt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–103

e0
“Irrigation at 65% available soil moisture depletion (AVSMD) did not significantly decrease chlorophyll content, dry matter (DM), leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR), relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential (OP), ear length, ear diameter, rows per ear, kernels per row,100-kernel weight and grain yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–573

Title

Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Planting Method on Maize Plants under Middle Delta Conditions of Egypt

O. S. Abu-Grab; Seham M. M. Ahmed; M. A. M. EL-Ghonemy Journal of Plant Production 2019. doi:10.21608/jpp.2019.62278

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The upper shoot also showed no decrease in growth or ash content under high humidity.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage: upper part of the shoote0
Treatment: >95% relative humiditye1
Outcome: upper part of the shoote0
Direction: neither a decreasee2
Comparator: 50–60%e1

Verbatim

e0
“This was also found when the upper part of the shoot (70–150 cm) was tested separately”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–575

e1
“Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277

e2
“there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487

Title

Does transpiration have an essential function in long‐distance ion transport in plants?

W. TANNER; H. BEEVERS Plant Cell & Environment 1990. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1990.tb01089.x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Water loss differed by a factor of two to three across humidity conditions.
Intervention effect High humidity did not decrease maize fresh or dry weight.
Intervention effect High humidity did not decrease maize ash content.
Mechanism The authors suggest transpiration is not essential for long-distance mineral transport.

“dry weight decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics