View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress similarly reduced leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars.
leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salt stress caused a similar decrease in leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1089 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d maize relative water content .
drought condition e0 relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 t0 “Zea mays seedlings
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic stress decrease d seedling relative water content .
osmotic stress t0 seedling relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in seedling relative water content (RWC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1153 t0 “osmotic stress resistance by improving leaf photosynthetic physiology and antioxidant capacity in maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–144 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content decrease d slightly without significant differences.
Leaf relative water content e0 overall decrease in relative water content was small e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Leaf relative water content and SPAD values also decrease d, but the overall decrease in relative water content was small, and the differences were not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–1002 t0 “Cd Stress on Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Maize Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–90 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress decrease d relative water content and in creased water deficit in dex in all genotypes.
relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Salt stress led to physiological drought in all maize genotypes as in dicated by the significant decrease in relative water content and in crease in water deficit in dex. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–604 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoot relative water content fell 28.65% versus control.
relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 e0 “There is a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) in both shoot and root by 28.65% and 11.13%, respectively, compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1206 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Root relative water content fell 11.13% versus control.
relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 e0 “There is a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) in both shoot and root by 28.65% and 11.13%, respectively, compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1206 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Exogenous Spd in hibited the decline in leaf relative water content under osmotic stress.
Exogenous Spd treatment e0 leaf relative water content e0 inhibited the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Exogenous Spd treatment not only obviously in hibited the decrease of leaf relative water content ,but also in creased the content of soluble protein. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–814 t0 “Maize Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In maize under elevated CO2, leaf relative water content starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.21 vs 0.43).
leaf relative water content e6 starts to decrease e6 Verbatim
e5 “After onset of progressive soil drying, maize plants in e[CO 2 ] showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–899 e6 “at which e.g. g s (0.31 vs 0.40) and leaf relative water content (0.21 vs 0.43) starts to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–999 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased the net photosynthetic rate only in wheat. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased dry matter accumulation in wheat and maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 decreased stomatal conductance and water consumption. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 27.82% in maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 49.86% in wheat. Association After onset of progressive soil drying, maize under elevated CO2 showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat. Association In maize under elevated CO2, stomatal conductance starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.31 vs 0.40). Association The authors interpret elevated CO2 as conferring greater drought resistance in maize. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, enhanced WUE was found only in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, DMA increased in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, water consumption was unaffected in wheat. Recommendation The authors recommend developing specific water management strategies to optimize crop WUE for different species under future drier, CO2-enriched conditions. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought sharply decrease d relative water content and pigment content in maize seedlings relative to control.
Relative Water Content (RWC) e1 Sharp decrease e1 control condition e1 Verbatim
t0 “Drought in Maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–116 e1 “Sharp decrease in Relative Water Content (RWC), Chl a, Chl b, carotenoid (Car) and total pigment content was observed under drought compared to control condition, while PAs application reversed their decreasing trends ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–578 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays