View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d maize relative water content .
Treatmentdrought condition e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 t0 “Zea mays seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress decrease d relative water content and in creased water deficit in dex in all genotypes.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Salt stress led to physiological drought in all maize genotypes as in dicated by the significant decrease in relative water content and in crease in water deficit in dex. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–604 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoot relative water content fell 28.65% versus control.
Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 e0 “There is a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) in both shoot and root by 28.65% and 11.13%, respectively, compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1206 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Root relative water content fell 11.13% versus control.
Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
t0 “MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 e0 “There is a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC) in both shoot and root by 28.65% and 11.13%, respectively, compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1206 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress decrease d maize leaf relative water content , photosynthetic characteristics and catalase activity.
Treatmentsalt stress treatments e0 Outcomeleaf relative water content, photosynthetic characteristics, and catalase activity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the leaf relative water content , photosynthetic characteristics, and catalase activity exhibited a significantly decrease of salt stress treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–532 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit significantly decrease d chlorophyll content relative to control.
Treatmentstressed plant e0 Outcomechlorophyll content e0 Verbatim
e0 “The significant decrease of chlorophyll content was obtained in stressed plant than control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–804 e1 “leaves of Zea mays L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–122 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation significantly reduced chlorophyll a, b and relative water content .
Treatmentdeficit irrigation e0 Outcomechlorophyll a, b and relative water content e0 Comparatornormal irrigation e1 Verbatim
e0 “deficit irrigation caused a significant decrease in grain yield and other agronomic traits, physiological characteristics (chlorophyll a, b and relative water content ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–802 e1 “normal irrigation, 80% of maximum daily crop evapotranspiration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–503 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect Deficit irrigation significantly reduced maize grain yield and agronomic traits. Intervention effect Deficit irrigation significantly reduced leaf area index, crop growth rate and relative growth rate. Intervention effect Water deficit increased leaf rolling percentage. Intervention effect With stronger deficit, SC705 chlorophyll a, b and relative water content fell more than in SC703 and SC704. Observation At severe stress, SC705 leaf rolling reached 60%. Observation SC705 had the highest grain yield, 8.51 t/ha, under normal irrigation. Observation SC705 had the highest biomass, 19.36 t/ha, under normal irrigation. Observation SC705 had minimum grain yield and biomass at 50% ETc. Intervention effect Increasing deficit from normal irrigation to 50% ETc significantly reduced SC705 leaf area index, plant growth rate and relative growth rate. Intervention effect Increasing deficit from normal irrigation to 50% ETc significantly reduced SC705 net photosynthesis rate. Recommendation The authors recommend preventing water deficit at critical maize growth stages. Recommendation The authors advise planting SC705 when enough irrigation water is available. Recommendation The authors consider SC704 suitable for water deficit, especially at 50% ETc. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress significantly decrease d relative water content .
Outcomerelative water content e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “Salt stress led to a significant decrease in the relative water content , shoot and root length, fresh and dry weight as well as leaf area and K + content but in crease Na + content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–672 t0 “Comparative morphological, physiological, and biochemical traits in sensitive and tolerant maize genotypes in response to salinity and pb stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–144 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d maize photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll, relative water content , height and yield.
Outcomenet photosynthesis rate, leaf stomatal conductance, chlorophyll (Chl.) a+b, relative water content (RWC), plant height, and grain yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought caused a significant decrease in net photosynthesis rate, leaf stomatal conductance, chlorophyll (Chl.) a+b, relative water content (RWC), plant height, and grain yield of Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1123 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Increasing drought elevated CAT, SOD, APX, REC and proline. Intervention effect Moderate drought increased WUE by 5.8% relative to control. Intervention effect Severe drought increased WUE by 11.7% relative to control. Observation Clay-loam soil produced the maximum grain yield of 491.8 g. Intervention effect SAP under drought enhanced gas exchange, chlorophyll, water content, height and grain yield. Intervention effect SAP under drought decreased REC, proline, CAT, SOD and APX activity. Observation The 80 kg.ha-1 SAP rate gave the highest photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and chlorophyll, and 10 kg.ha-1 gave the lowest. Intervention effect SAP at 40 and 80 kg.ha-1 increased leaf relative water content. Intervention effect SAP at 10 and 20 kg.ha-1 had no significant effect on leaf relative water content versus control. Recommendation The authors recommend 80 kg.ha-1 SAP for drought in sandy and clay-loam soils. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity stress significantly decrease d leaf water potential and relative water content in maize
Treatmentsalinity stress (SS; 100 mM NaCl) e0 Outcomeleaf water potential, relative water content e1 Comparatorcontrol (no NaCl added) e0 Verbatim
t0 “maize (Zea mays ) plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–163 e0 “control (no NaCl added) or salinity stress (SS; 100 mM NaCl) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–542 e1 “SS caused a significant decrease in plant growth, PSII maximum efficiency, chlorophyll a and b, leaf water potential, relative water content , mineral element content s, ascorbate, and glutathione ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–809 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.