Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: okra ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment decreased egg mass by 92.4% relative to the untreated check.

Treatment
seed treatment with T. viride + P. fluorescens, each @ 5 g/kg and soil application of P. lilacinum@ 2.5 kg at 15 days after sowinge3
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
egg masse5
Direction
decreasee5
Value
92.4%e5
Comparator
untreated checke4

Verbatim

t0

“Bio-management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47
e3

“T12 where seed treatment with T. viride + P. fluorescens, each @ 5 g/kg and soil application of P. lilacinum@ 2.5 kg at 15 days after sowing, exhibited the highest shoot length (93.0 cm), fresh weight of shoots (54.27g), fresh weight of roots (11.45g), dry weight of shoots (8.64g), dry weight of roots(3.79g) and total biomass yield (12.42g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1145
e4

“with 95.2%, 96.8%, 90.2%, 89.4%, 98.2% and 92.0%, respectively increase over untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1238
e5

“with corresponding decrease in galls (87.5%), egg mass (92.4%), no. of eggs/egg mass (63.8%) and nematode population in soil (83.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1371

Title

Bio-management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra

J.K. Mahalik; Niranjana Sahoo Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2017

Other claims from this paper (13)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment decreased galls on okra roots by 87.5% relative to the untreated check.

Treatment
seed treatment with T. viride + P. fluorescens, each @ 5 g/kg and soil application of P. lilacinum@ 2.5 kg at 15 days after sowinge3
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
gallse5
Direction
decreasee5
Value
87.5%e5
Comparator
untreated checke4

Verbatim

t0

“Bio-management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47
e3

“T12 where seed treatment with T. viride + P. fluorescens, each @ 5 g/kg and soil application of P. lilacinum@ 2.5 kg at 15 days after sowing, exhibited the highest shoot length (93.0 cm), fresh weight of shoots (54.27g), fresh weight of roots (11.45g), dry weight of shoots (8.64g), dry weight of roots(3.79g) and total biomass yield (12.42g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1145
e4

“with 95.2%, 96.8%, 90.2%, 89.4%, 98.2% and 92.0%, respectively increase over untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1238
e5

“with corresponding decrease in galls (87.5%), egg mass (92.4%), no. of eggs/egg mass (63.8%) and nematode population in soil (83.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1371

Title

Bio-management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra

J.K. Mahalik; Niranjana Sahoo Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2017

Other claims from this paper (13)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment decreased the nematode population in soil by 83.9% relative to the untreated check.

Treatment
seed treatment with T. viride + P. fluorescens, each @ 5 g/kg and soil application of P. lilacinum@ 2.5 kg at 15 days after sowinge3
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
nematode population in soile5
Direction
decreasee5
Value
83.9%e5
Comparator
untreated checke4

Verbatim

t0

“Bio-management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47
e3

“T12 where seed treatment with T. viride + P. fluorescens, each @ 5 g/kg and soil application of P. lilacinum@ 2.5 kg at 15 days after sowing, exhibited the highest shoot length (93.0 cm), fresh weight of shoots (54.27g), fresh weight of roots (11.45g), dry weight of shoots (8.64g), dry weight of roots(3.79g) and total biomass yield (12.42g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1145
e4

“with 95.2%, 96.8%, 90.2%, 89.4%, 98.2% and 92.0%, respectively increase over untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1238
e5

“with corresponding decrease in galls (87.5%), egg mass (92.4%), no. of eggs/egg mass (63.8%) and nematode population in soil (83.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1371

Title

Bio-management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra

J.K. Mahalik; Niranjana Sahoo Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2017

Other claims from this paper (13)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment decreased the number of eggs per egg mass by 63.8% relative to the untreated check.

Treatment
seed treatment with T. viride + P. fluorescens, each @ 5 g/kg and soil application of P. lilacinum@ 2.5 kg at 15 days after sowinge3
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Outcome
no. of eggs/egg masse5
Direction
decreasee5
Value
63.8%e5
Comparator
untreated checke4

Verbatim

t0

“Bio-management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–47
e3

“T12 where seed treatment with T. viride + P. fluorescens, each @ 5 g/kg and soil application of P. lilacinum@ 2.5 kg at 15 days after sowing, exhibited the highest shoot length (93.0 cm), fresh weight of shoots (54.27g), fresh weight of roots (11.45g), dry weight of shoots (8.64g), dry weight of roots(3.79g) and total biomass yield (12.42g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1145
e4

“with 95.2%, 96.8%, 90.2%, 89.4%, 98.2% and 92.0%, respectively increase over untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1238
e5

“with corresponding decrease in galls (87.5%), egg mass (92.4%), no. of eggs/egg mass (63.8%) and nematode population in soil (83.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1371

Title

Bio-management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra

J.K. Mahalik; Niranjana Sahoo Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2017

Other claims from this paper (13)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jatropha oil cake at 1.5 t/ha increased okra plant height by 72.8% over the check.

Treatment
jatropha oil cake @ 1.5 t/hae1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
increasee1
Value
72.8%e1
Comparator
over checke1

Verbatim

e1

“jatropha oil cake @ 1.5 t/ha was most effective organic amendment performing better than others contributing significantly increase in plant height by 72.8%, fresh shoot weight by 73.3%, fresh root weight by 84.9%, dry shoot weight by 80.0%, dry root weight by 87.6% and biomass yield by 80.8%, respectively with corresponding decrease in order of number of root galls by 86.0%, number of egg masses by 87.3% and root kn…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–930
t0

“Management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra through Oilcakes amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70

Title

Management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra through Oilcakes amendment

J.K. Mahalik; Nachiketa Sahoo; Poornata Jena Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2016

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jatropha oil cake at 1.5 t/ha increased okra biomass yield by 80.8% over the check.

Treatment
jatropha oil cake @ 1.5 t/hae1
Outcome
biomass yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
80.8%e1
Comparator
over checke1

Verbatim

e1

“jatropha oil cake @ 1.5 t/ha was most effective organic amendment performing better than others contributing significantly increase in plant height by 72.8%, fresh shoot weight by 73.3%, fresh root weight by 84.9%, dry shoot weight by 80.0%, dry root weight by 87.6% and biomass yield by 80.8%, respectively with corresponding decrease in order of number of root galls by 86.0%, number of egg masses by 87.3% and root kn…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–930
t0

“Management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra through Oilcakes amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70

Title

Management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra through Oilcakes amendment

J.K. Mahalik; Nachiketa Sahoo; Poornata Jena Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2016

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium azide at T1 (0.04%) gave lower fresh weight in Arka Anamika than the control in pot culture (1.66 gm vs 2.11 gm).

Material
Arka Anamikae3
Treatment
sodium azide at T1 (0.04% sodium azide)e3
Outcome
fresh weighte3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
1.66 gme3
Qualifier
2.11 gme3
Comparator
controle3
Setting
pot culturee3

Verbatim

e1

“It was observed that the incresing dose of sodium azide was showed adverse effect on germination percentage (%) as well as morphological characters of two different varieties of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–788
e3

“Similarly, the application of Sodium azide at T1 (0.04% sodium azide) showed similar results in growth parameters such as number of leaves (3.76) , fresh weight (1.66 gm) and dry weight (0.46 gm) in the variety Arka Anamika as compared with the control (6.66, 2.11 gm and 0.70 gm respectively) in the pot culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1443

Title

Effect of Sodium Azide Induction on Germination Percentage and Morphological Growth in Two Varieties of Okra

Amol D. Sable; Asmita D. Sable; Sweety P. Shegokar; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.706.422

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment maximally increased okra growth parameters and yield.

Treatment
P. lilacinus @ 4g/kg soil, carbosulfan, 25 EC @ 0.2%, poultry manure @ 2.5 t/ha and FYM @ 2.5 t/hae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant height, root length, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root including yielde0
Direction
Maximum increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum increase in growth parameters viz., plant height, root length, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root including yield and decrease in number of galls, eggmasses per root system and final nematode population in soil was observed in the combined treatment with P. lilacinus @ 4g/kg soil, carbosulfan, 25 EC @ 0.2%, poultry manure @ 2.5 t/ha and FYM @ 2.5 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–635
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75

Title

Integrated management of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench)

Nabanita Das; Archana Sinha Indian Journal Of Nematology 2005

Other claims from this paper (3)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium azide at T1 (0.04%) gave lower fresh weight in Parbhani Kranti than the control in pot culture (2.43 gm vs 3.66 gm).

Material
Parbhani Krantie2
Treatment
sodium azide at T1 (0.04% of sodium azide)e2
Outcome
fresh weighte2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
2.43 gme2
Qualifier
3.66 gme2
Comparator
contole2
Setting
pot culturee2

Verbatim

e1

“It was observed that the incresing dose of sodium azide was showed adverse effect on germination percentage (%) as well as morphological characters of two different varieties of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–788
e2

“The application of sodium azide at T1 (0.04% of sodium azide) showed similar results in growth parameters such as number of leaves (4.77) , plant height (4.42 cm) , fresh weight (2.43 gm) and dry weight (0.96 gm) in the variety Parbhani Kranti as compared with the contol (5.50 , 9.16 cm ,3.66 gm and 1.03 gm respectively) in the pot culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–1130

Title

Effect of Sodium Azide Induction on Germination Percentage and Morphological Growth in Two Varieties of Okra

Amol D. Sable; Asmita D. Sable; Sweety P. Shegokar; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.706.422

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium azide at T1 (0.04%) gave fewer leaves in Arka Anamika than the control in pot culture (3.76 vs 6.66).

Material
Arka Anamikae3
Treatment
sodium azide at T1 (0.04% sodium azide)e3
Outcome
number of leavese3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Value
3.76e3
Qualifier
6.66e3
Comparator
controle3
Setting
pot culturee3

Verbatim

e1

“It was observed that the incresing dose of sodium azide was showed adverse effect on germination percentage (%) as well as morphological characters of two different varieties of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–788
e3

“Similarly, the application of Sodium azide at T1 (0.04% sodium azide) showed similar results in growth parameters such as number of leaves (3.76) , fresh weight (1.66 gm) and dry weight (0.46 gm) in the variety Arka Anamika as compared with the control (6.66, 2.11 gm and 0.70 gm respectively) in the pot culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1443

Title

Effect of Sodium Azide Induction on Germination Percentage and Morphological Growth in Two Varieties of Okra

Amol D. Sable; Asmita D. Sable; Sweety P. Shegokar; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.706.422

Other claims from this paper (8)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.