Paper · 2005 · Indian Journal Of Nematology

Integrated management of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench)

Nabanita Das; Archana Sinha

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiment was carried out for two years during the kharif seasons of 2003 and 2004 to study the efficacy of Paecilomyces lilacinus, carbosulfan (as seed treatment), poultry manure and FYM alone and in combination in the management of Meloidogyne incognita on okra. Maximum increase in growth parameters viz., plant height, root length, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root including yield and decrease in number of galls, eggmasses per root system and final nematode population in soil was observed in the combined treatment with P. lilacinus @ 4g/kg soil, carbosulfan, 25 EC @ 0.2%, poultry manure @ 2.5 t/ha and FYM @ 2.5 t/ha. All the treatments were found to be significantly different from the control in increasing growth parameters and reducing in nematode population in soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment maximally increased okra growth parameters and yield.

Treatment
P. lilacinus @ 4g/kg soil, carbosulfan, 25 EC @ 0.2%, poultry manure @ 2.5 t/ha and FYM @ 2.5 t/hae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant height, root length, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root including yielde0
Direction
Maximum increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Second interactorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum increase in growth parameters viz., plant height, root length, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root including yield and decrease in number of galls, eggmasses per root system and final nematode population in soil was observed in the combined treatment with P. lilacinus @ 4g/kg soil, carbosulfan, 25 EC @ 0.2%, poultry manure @ 2.5 t/ha and FYM @ 2.5 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment maximally decreased galls, egg masses and soil nematode population.

Treatment
P. lilacinus @ 4g/kg soil, carbosulfan, 25 EC @ 0.2%, poultry manure @ 2.5 t/ha and FYM @ 2.5 t/hae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of galls, eggmasses per root system and final nematode population in soile0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Second interactorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in number of galls, eggmasses per root system and final nematode population in soil was observed in the combined treatment with P. lilacinus @ 4g/kg soil, carbosulfan, 25 EC @ 0.2%, poultry manure @ 2.5 t/ha and FYM @ 2.5 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments significantly increased okra growth compared with control.

Treatment
All the treatmentse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the treatments were found to be significantly different from the control in increasing growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments significantly reduced soil nematode population compared with control.

Treatment
All the treatmentse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
nematode population in soile0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the treatments were found to be significantly different from the control in increasing growth parameters and reducing in nematode population in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita) on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑

carbosulfan · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Purpureocillium lilacinum · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.