View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Oospores were absent in C. maxima .
Verbatim
e0 “C. maxima (cv. Tripoli) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1587 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
No seedlings were found within established G. maxima infestations.
OutcomeNo seedlings were found e1 Verbatim
e1 “No seedlings were found within established G. maxima infestations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–587 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
A new species, M. maxima , was described from Northern Peru.
Verbatim
e0 “M. maxima ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–62 t0 “Muhlenbergia and Uniola ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–44 e1 “Northern Peru ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–116 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cucurbita maxima has twenty bivalent chromosomes.
Outcomebivalent chromosomes e0 Verbatim
e0 “Cucurbita pepo and C. maxima each has twenty bivalent chromosomes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–236 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
C. maxima showed high genotypic variability.
Outcomegenotypic variability e0 Verbatim
e0 “This study proved the existence of high genotypic variability in C. maxima ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1161 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Pollen tube growth differed for the C. maxima ×C. moschata (Fig. 3) cross.
OutcomeC. maxima ×C. moschata (Fig. 3)e0 Verbatim
e0 “C. maxima ×C. moschata (Fig. 3) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–348 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Pollen tube growth differed for the C. maxima ×C. pepo (Fig. 4) cross.
OutcomeC. maxima ×C. pepo (Fig. 4)e0 Verbatim
e0 “C. maxima ×C. pepo (Fig. 4) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–409 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Crosses between C. maxima and C. moschata were incompletely compatible.
Verbatim
e0 “C. maxima と C. moschata との間の交雜は不完全な和合性である ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–637 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spring nodular activity maxima were 8-250 times summer minima.
Taxonnative Australian legumes t0 Value8-250 times summer minima e0 Verbatim
e0 “spring maxima 8-250 times summer minima ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–494 t0 “Native Australian Legumes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–46 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Briza maxima was classified as a horthophyte and ergasiofigophyte.
Outcomehorthophyte and ergasiofigophyte e0 Verbatim
e0 “B. maxima as horthophyte and ergasiofigophyte ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1213 e1 “Briza maxima L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–481 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.