View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
One week of red light at night did not significantly affect leaf biomass and area of tomato.
TreatmentRed light application for one week at night e1 Outcomeleaf biomass and area e1 Directiondid not significantly affect e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “nocturnal red light exposure on mature tomato plant leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–410 e1 “Red light application for one week at night did not significantly affect leaf biomass and area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–570 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The 3K array and GBS-based SNPs performed similarly for training population optimization, forward prediction, and univariate and multivariate genomic prediction of forage yield in oat.
ComparatorGBS-based SNPs e0 Verbatim
e0 “similar performance of both the 3K array and GBS-based SNPs in terms of training population optimization, forward prediction, and univariate and multivariate genomic prediction of forage yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–894 t0 “biomass yield in oat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–134 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
GBLUP, Bayes-B and random forest models gave similar predictive ability for dry matter yield across harvest-year combinations and both marker platforms.
Outcomepredictive ability for dry matter yield (DMY) e0 Verbatim
e0 “The genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), Bayes-B, and random forest models gave similar predictive ability for dry matter yield (DMY) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1041 t0 “biomass yield in oat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–134 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
MsPR-1b displayed no detectable lipid-binding capacity or direct antimicrobial activity.
Outcomelipid-binding capacity or direct antimicrobial activity e1 Verbatim
t0 “Mucuna sempervirens ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–126 e1 “MsPR-1b displays no detectable lipid-binding capacity or direct antimicrobial activity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1836 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The inhibitory effect of the spore suspension on weed germination did not differ from that of commercial pendimethalin.
Outcomeinhibitory effect e0 Directiondid not differ e0 Comparatorcommercial pendimethalin e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “the inhibitory effect did not differ from that of commercial pendimethalin ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–769 e1 “Chenopodium glaucum is one of the most serious weeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–72 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing and plant removal patterns had minimal effects on UAV prediction error.
TreatmentRow spacing and plant removal patterns e1 Outcomeprediction error e1 Directionminimal effects e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “stand counts in soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–64 e1 “Row spacing and plant removal patterns had minimal effects on prediction error ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1471 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed review summary no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A spray drone application gave weed control in rice similar to a knapsack manual sprayer despite reduced spray volume, coverage and droplet deposits.
Treatmentspray drone application e1 Comparatorknapsack manual sprayer e1 Verbatim
e1 “Paul et al. observed similar weed control in rice from a spray drone application compared to a knapsack manual sprayer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–726 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed seed distribution did not differ between sampling depths.
Organ / stagesampling depths e1 Outcomeweed seed distribution e1 Directiondid not differ e1 Verbatim
t0 “weed flora ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 e1 “weed seed distribution did not differ between sampling depths or fertiliser regimes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1002 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed seed distribution did not differ between fertiliser regimes.
Treatmentfertiliser regimes e1 Outcomeweed seed distribution e1 Directiondid not differ e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “weed flora ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 e1 “weed seed distribution did not differ between sampling depths or fertiliser regimes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1002 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Seedlings did not die and their physiological characteristics showed no significant decrease under Ni2+ exposure.
TreatmentNi 2+ concentration e0 Outcomephysiological characteristics e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Halogeton glomeratus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–70 e0 “H. glomeratus growth was significantly inhibited when the Ni 2+ concentration was higher than 1.5 mM, but the seedlings did not experience any seedling death and physiological characteristics showed no significant decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–576 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.