Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Double Nickel did not significantly reduce white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.

Taxon: Dry Black Beant0
Treatment: Double Nickele0
Interactor: Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume1pathogen
Outcome: incidence on plantse0
Direction: no_changeinferrede0
Comparator: nontreated control plotse0

Verbatim

e0
“All products significantly reduced the incidence on plants compared with nontreated control plots, except for Double Nickel”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–535

e1
“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46

t0
“Dry Black Bean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68

Title

Evaluation of Fungicides for White Mold Management in Dry Black Bean in Geneva, New York, 2024

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Aastha Subedi; Sean Murphy Plant Health Progress 2026. doi:10.1094/php-02-26-0053-pdmr

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect All tested fungicides except Double Nickel significantly reduced white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect White mold incidence on plants with Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia and Badge X2.
Intervention effect All treatments significantly reduced white mold incidence on pods compared with control plots.
Intervention effect White mold incidence on pods did not differ significantly between the treatments.
Intervention effect Treatment had no significant effect on pod yield components.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

White mold incidence on plants with Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia and Badge X2.

Taxon: Dry Black Beant0
Treatment: Double Nickele0
Interactor: Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume1pathogen
Outcome: incidence on plantse0
Direction: not significantly differente0
Comparator: Howler EVO, Theia, and Badge X2e0

Verbatim

e0
“The incidence on plants in plots receiving Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia, and Badge X2”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–662

e1
“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46

t0
“Dry Black Bean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68

Title

Evaluation of Fungicides for White Mold Management in Dry Black Bean in Geneva, New York, 2024

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Aastha Subedi; Sean Murphy Plant Health Progress 2026. doi:10.1094/php-02-26-0053-pdmr

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect All tested fungicides except Double Nickel significantly reduced white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect Double Nickel did not significantly reduce white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect All treatments significantly reduced white mold incidence on pods compared with control plots.
Intervention effect White mold incidence on pods did not differ significantly between the treatments.
Intervention effect Treatment had no significant effect on pod yield components.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

White mold incidence on pods did not differ significantly between the treatments.

Taxon: Dry Black Beant0
Organ / stage: podse0
Treatment: all treatmentse0
Interactor: Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume1pathogen
Outcome: incidence of white mold on podse0
Direction: not significantly differente0
Comparator: each othere0

Verbatim

e0
“The incidence of white mold on pods was significantly reduced by all treatments compared with control plots, and they were not significantly different between each other”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–833

e1
“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46

t0
“Dry Black Bean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68

Title

Evaluation of Fungicides for White Mold Management in Dry Black Bean in Geneva, New York, 2024

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Aastha Subedi; Sean Murphy Plant Health Progress 2026. doi:10.1094/php-02-26-0053-pdmr

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect All tested fungicides except Double Nickel significantly reduced white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect Double Nickel did not significantly reduce white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect White mold incidence on plants with Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia and Badge X2.
Intervention effect All treatments significantly reduced white mold incidence on pods compared with control plots.
Intervention effect Treatment had no significant effect on pod yield components.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment had no significant effect on pod yield components.

Taxon: Dry Black Beant0
Treatment: Treatmente0
Outcome: pod yield componentse0
Direction: no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Dry Black Bean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68

e0
“Treatment had no significant effect on the pod yield components”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–898

Title

Evaluation of Fungicides for White Mold Management in Dry Black Bean in Geneva, New York, 2024

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Aastha Subedi; Sean Murphy Plant Health Progress 2026. doi:10.1094/php-02-26-0053-pdmr

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect All tested fungicides except Double Nickel significantly reduced white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect Double Nickel did not significantly reduce white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Intervention effect White mold incidence on plants with Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia and Badge X2.
Intervention effect All treatments significantly reduced white mold incidence on pods compared with control plots.
Intervention effect White mold incidence on pods did not differ significantly between the treatments.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reanalysis of the earlier study data found no support for the hypothesis of a polyphyletic origin of plant Type I genes.

Taxon: Land PlantsEmbryophytat0
Outcome: supporting evidence for this hypothesise0
Qualifier: reanalyzing the original datae0

Verbatim

t0
“SRF-type MADS-Box Genes in Land Plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–75

e0
“By reanalyzing the original data from that study, we do not find supporting evidence for this hypothesis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1017

Title

No Evidence Supports the Presence of SRF-type MADS-Box Genes in Land Plants

Yichun Qiu; Zhen Li; Claudia Köhler Genome Biology and Evolution 2026. doi:10.1093/gbe/evag140

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phylogeny, sequence similarity and structural evidence show no evidence of SRF-derived genes in land plants.

Taxon: land plantsEmbryophytae0
Gene: SRF-derived genese0
Outcome: no evidence of SRF-derived genese0

Verbatim

e0
“using phylogeny, sequence similarity, and structural evidence, we demonstrate that there is no evidence of SRF-derived genes in land plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1168

Title

No Evidence Supports the Presence of SRF-type MADS-Box Genes in Land Plants

Yichun Qiu; Zhen Li; Claudia Köhler Genome Biology and Evolution 2026. doi:10.1093/gbe/evag140

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrier volume (140 versus 280 L ha -1) did not significantly affect Palmer amaranth control.

Taxon: Palmer amaranthe0
Treatment: carrier volumee0
Outcome: Palmer amaranth controle0
Direction: did not significantly affecte0
Qualifier: 140 L ha -1 and 280 L ha -1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“carrier volume did not significantly affect Palmer amaranth control at these volumes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1444

e1
“mixtures of 140 L ha -1 and 280 L ha -1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1330

Title

Managing Auxin-Resistant Palmer Amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri ) from West Tennessee with Sequential Applications of 2,4-D with and without Glufosinate

Colton Fuller; Thomas Mueller; Lawrence E. Steckel Weed Technology 2026. doi:10.1017/wet.2026.10115

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The dose of selenium and the timing of its application were not associated with significant changes in the content of both forms of sulphur in the tested plants.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: dose of selenium and the timing of its applicatione0
Outcome: content of both forms of sulphure0
Direction: not associated with significant changese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114

e0
“the dose of selenium and the timing of its application were not associated with significant changes in the content of both forms of sulphur in the tested plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1208

Title

Selenium (IV) and Sulphur (VI) as Elements Modifying Plant Quality: Content of Selenium and Sulphur Forms in Wheat

Marzena S. Brodowska; Magdalena Kurzyna-Szklarek; Mirosław Wyszkowski Molecules 2026. doi:10.3390/molecules31010160

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of spelt wheat.
Intervention effect Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of common wheat.
Intervention effect The concentration of selenium in wheat was also influenced by the timing of selenium application.
Intervention effect The experimental factors used did not lead to selenium levels toxic to humans and animals.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence in the growth environment increased total sulphur, sulphate sulphur and organic sulphur contents in spelt wheat grain and straw.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence in the growth environment increased total sulphur, sulphate sulphur and organic sulphur contents in common wheat grain and straw.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased total sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 17%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased sulphate sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 29%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased organic sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 23%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased total sulphur content of common wheat straw by 26%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased sulphate sulphur content of common wheat straw by 18%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased organic sulphur content of common wheat straw by 57%.
Intervention effect The sulphur content in the plant growth environment was not associated with a change in the selenium content in the grain of the tested plants.
Recommendation The authors suggest the optimal selenium dose for biofortification is 20 mg Se ha-1 on clay soil, applied during the stem elongation phase of spelt and common wheat.
Recommendation The authors conclude that biofortification of wheat with selenium and sulphur is a good method of supplementing deficiencies of this element in the human diet.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The experimental factors used did not lead to selenium levels toxic to humans and animals.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: experimental factorse0
Outcome: selenium levels toxic to humans and animalse0
Direction: did not contributee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114

e0
“The experimental factors used did not contribute to the achievement of selenium levels toxic to humans and animals”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1324

Title

Selenium (IV) and Sulphur (VI) as Elements Modifying Plant Quality: Content of Selenium and Sulphur Forms in Wheat

Marzena S. Brodowska; Magdalena Kurzyna-Szklarek; Mirosław Wyszkowski Molecules 2026. doi:10.3390/molecules31010160

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sulphur content in the plant growth environment was not associated with a change in the selenium content in the grain of the tested plants.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage: graine0
Treatment: sulphur content in the plant growth environmente0
Outcome: selenium content in the graine0
Direction: not associated with a changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114

e0
“The sulphur content in the plant growth environment was not associated with a change in the selenium content in the grain of the tested plants”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1825

Title

Selenium (IV) and Sulphur (VI) as Elements Modifying Plant Quality: Content of Selenium and Sulphur Forms in Wheat

Marzena S. Brodowska; Magdalena Kurzyna-Szklarek; Mirosław Wyszkowski Molecules 2026. doi:10.3390/molecules31010160

Other claims from this paper (15)

Intervention effect Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of spelt wheat.
Intervention effect Selenium fertilisation significantly increased the selenium content in the grain of common wheat.
Intervention effect The concentration of selenium in wheat was also influenced by the timing of selenium application.
Intervention effect The dose of selenium and the timing of its application were not associated with significant changes in the content of both forms of sulphur in the tested plants.
Intervention effect The experimental factors used did not lead to selenium levels toxic to humans and animals.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence in the growth environment increased total sulphur, sulphate sulphur and organic sulphur contents in spelt wheat grain and straw.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence in the growth environment increased total sulphur, sulphate sulphur and organic sulphur contents in common wheat grain and straw.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased total sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 17%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased sulphate sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 29%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased organic sulphur content of spelt wheat straw by an average of 23%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased total sulphur content of common wheat straw by 26%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased sulphate sulphur content of common wheat straw by 18%.
Intervention effect Sulphur presence increased organic sulphur content of common wheat straw by 57%.
Recommendation The authors suggest the optimal selenium dose for biofortification is 20 mg Se ha-1 on clay soil, applied during the stem elongation phase of spelt and common wheat.
Recommendation The authors conclude that biofortification of wheat with selenium and sulphur is a good method of supplementing deficiencies of this element in the human diet.

All claims

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics