Search claims · PlantClaims

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The new protocol gave higher recovery growth for wasabi than conventional encapsulation-dehydration.

Taxon: wasabie0
Outcome: rates of recovery growthe0
Direction: much highere0
Comparator: conventional encapsulation-dehydratione0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0
“much higher rates of recovery growth in the three plant species tested (wasabi, chrysanthemum, and mint) than those cryopreserved by the conventional encapsulation-dehydration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–723

Title

Newly developed encapsulation-dehydration protocol for plantcryopreservation.

A Sakai; T Matsumoto; D Hirai; et al. PubMed

Other claims from this paper (3)

Method / resource The new protocol gave higher recovery growth for chrysanthemum than conventional encapsulation-dehydration.
Method / resource The new protocol gave higher recovery growth for mint than conventional encapsulation-dehydration.
Method / resource The protocol considerably reduced time needed for the cryogenic procedure.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The new protocol gave higher recovery growth for chrysanthemum than conventional encapsulation-dehydration.

Taxon: chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Outcome: rates of recovery growthe0
Direction: much highere0
Comparator: conventional encapsulation-dehydratione0

Verbatim

e0
“much higher rates of recovery growth in the three plant species tested (wasabi, chrysanthemum, and mint) than those cryopreserved by the conventional encapsulation-dehydration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–723

Title

Newly developed encapsulation-dehydration protocol for plantcryopreservation.

A Sakai; T Matsumoto; D Hirai; et al. PubMed

Other claims from this paper (3)

Method / resource The new protocol gave higher recovery growth for wasabi than conventional encapsulation-dehydration.
Method / resource The new protocol gave higher recovery growth for mint than conventional encapsulation-dehydration.
Method / resource The protocol considerably reduced time needed for the cryogenic procedure.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The new protocol gave higher recovery growth for mint than conventional encapsulation-dehydration.

Taxon: minte0
Outcome: rates of recovery growthe0
Direction: much highere0
Comparator: conventional encapsulation-dehydratione0

Verbatim

e0
“much higher rates of recovery growth in the three plant species tested (wasabi, chrysanthemum, and mint) than those cryopreserved by the conventional encapsulation-dehydration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–723

Title

Newly developed encapsulation-dehydration protocol for plantcryopreservation.

A Sakai; T Matsumoto; D Hirai; et al. PubMed

Other claims from this paper (3)

Method / resource The new protocol gave higher recovery growth for wasabi than conventional encapsulation-dehydration.
Method / resource The new protocol gave higher recovery growth for chrysanthemum than conventional encapsulation-dehydration.
Method / resource The protocol considerably reduced time needed for the cryogenic procedure.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Droughted maize seedlings had higher relative growth and net assimilation rates in recovery.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: droughtede0
Outcome: RGR and NARe0
Direction: highere0
Qualifier: during recoverye0
Comparator: non‐droughted seedlingse0

Verbatim

e0
“RGR and NAR of droughted maize seedlings were higher than those of non‐droughted seedlings during recovery, irrespective of the growth medium (perlite or hydroponic)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1352

t0
“maize (Zea mays)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76

Title

Drought enhances chilling tolerance in a chilling‐sensitive maize (Zea mays) variety

JUAN J. IRIGOYEN; JAVIER PEREZ DE JUAN; MANUEL SANCHEZ‐DIAZ New Phytologist 1996. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01145.x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Pre-drought reduced chilling-induced leaf necrosis.
Intervention effect Droughted plants had higher leaf water status after chilling.
Mechanism Drought-induced stomatal closure was proposed to explain higher water status.
Intervention effect Chilling reduced carbon dioxide exchange similarly in droughted and untreated seedlings.
Intervention effect During recovery, droughted seedlings had higher carbon dioxide fixation.
Mechanism The authors inferred that stomatal limitation did not cause chilling-induced CER inhibition.
Intervention effect Droughted maize had better photosynthetic water-use efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N fertilizer rates decreased apparent N recovery and N use efficiency of rice.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae6
Treatment: increasing rates of N fertilizere6
Outcome: apparent N recovery and Nuse efficiencye6
Direction: decreasee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e6
“There was a significant increase in the N uptake of the rice but a decrease in the apparent N recovery and Nuse efficiency of applied fertilizer N, with the application of increasing rates of N fertilizer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1215

t0
“rice growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39

Title

Effect of nitrogen rates on rice growth and biological nitrogen fixation

R. Carreres; R. González Tomé; J. Sendra; et al. The Journal of Agricultural Science 1996. doi:10.1017/s002185960007845x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 7.98% greater than in fresh water (FW).

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: BWe0
Outcome: Plant 15N recovery ratese0
Direction: greatere0
Value: 7.98%e0
Comparator: FWe0

Verbatim

e0
“Plant 15N recovery rates in BW were 7.98% and 30.01% greater than those in FW and SW, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1135

t0
“Cotton growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13

Title

Cotton growth and the fate of N fertilizer as affected by saline water irrigation and N fertigation in a drip-irrigated field

Wei Min; Huijuan Guo; Zhiqiang Hu; et al. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 2017. doi:10.1080/09064710.2017.1338309

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as N amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield were significantly less with saline water (SW) than with fresh water (FW) and brackish water (BW).
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the I540 irrigation treatments than in the I405 treatments.
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the N360 treatments than in the N240 treatments.
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 30.01% greater than in saline water (SW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N increased as N fertilizer amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N declined as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in brackish water (BW) treatments was 6.02% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in saline water (SW) treatments was 21.44% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Total 15N recovery was significantly greater in brackish water (BW) than in fresh water (FW) and saline water (SW).
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation amount.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation water salinity.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in N rate.
Intervention effect The authors suggest that, with appropriate amounts of irrigation water and N fertilizer, brackish irrigation water (4.61 dS/m) will not affect cotton growth, yield and N recovery.
Intervention effect The authors conclude that saline irrigation water (EC > 8 dS/m) reduces cotton growth, yield and N use efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 30.01% greater than in saline water (SW).

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: BWe0
Outcome: Plant 15N recovery ratese0
Direction: greatere0
Value: 30.01%e0
Comparator: SWe0

Verbatim

e0
“Plant 15N recovery rates in BW were 7.98% and 30.01% greater than those in FW and SW, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1135

t0
“Cotton growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13

Title

Cotton growth and the fate of N fertilizer as affected by saline water irrigation and N fertigation in a drip-irrigated field

Wei Min; Huijuan Guo; Zhiqiang Hu; et al. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 2017. doi:10.1080/09064710.2017.1338309

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as N amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield were significantly less with saline water (SW) than with fresh water (FW) and brackish water (BW).
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the I540 irrigation treatments than in the I405 treatments.
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the N360 treatments than in the N240 treatments.
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 7.98% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N increased as N fertilizer amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N declined as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in brackish water (BW) treatments was 6.02% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in saline water (SW) treatments was 21.44% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Total 15N recovery was significantly greater in brackish water (BW) than in fresh water (FW) and saline water (SW).
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation amount.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation water salinity.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in N rate.
Intervention effect The authors suggest that, with appropriate amounts of irrigation water and N fertilizer, brackish irrigation water (4.61 dS/m) will not affect cotton growth, yield and N recovery.
Intervention effect The authors conclude that saline irrigation water (EC > 8 dS/m) reduces cotton growth, yield and N use efficiency.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited maize silk elongation recovery after rescue irrigation was probably due to low water potentials and ovary growth rates.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage: silke0
Outcome: limited recovery of silk elongatione0
Qualifier: water potentials below the threshold for elongation and lower growth rates of the associated ovariese0

Verbatim

e0
“The limited recovery of silk elongation, especially at the apical and basal regions following rescue irrigation was probably due to water potentials below the threshold for elongation and lower growth rates of the associated ovaries.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–999

t0
“maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34

Title

Pre‐silking water deficit in maize induced kernel loss through impaired silk growth and ovary carbohydrate dynamics

Yebei Li; Shoubing Huang; Qingfeng Meng; et al. Plant-Environment Interactions 2024. doi:10.1002/pei3.10141

Other claims from this paper (7)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied zinc efficiencies decreased as zinc application rates increased, except crop recovery efficiency.

Treatment: Zn application ratese0
Outcome: Efficiencies of applied Zne0
Direction: decreasede0
Qualifier: except crop recovery efficiencye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“Efficiencies of applied Zn decreased with increasing Zn application rates, except crop recovery efficiency.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–793

Title

Evaluation of Different Methods of Zinc Application on Growth, Yield and Biofortification of Zinc in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Ayan Das; S.K. Singh; Maneesh Kumar; et al. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2019. doi:10.5958/0974-0228.2019.00010.0

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Combined soil, root dipping and foliar zinc increased grain yield by 27.2% over RDF.
Intervention effect Root dipping plus foliar zinc increased grain yield by 22.6% over RDF.
Association Grain zinc content correlated positively with grain yield.
Intervention effect Soil plus foliar zinc produced the maximum grain zinc content.
Intervention effect Soil plus foliar zinc produced maximum bioavailability of fortified zinc.
Observation Less than 1% of fortified grain zinc was bioavailable.
Association Zinc enrichment correlated negatively with grain iron content.
Association Zinc enrichment correlated negatively with straw iron content.
Association Zinc enrichment correlated positively with grain manganese content.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the N360 treatments than in the N240 treatments.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment: N360 treatmentse0
Outcome: Plant 15N recovery ratese0
Direction: greatere0
Comparator: N240 treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0
“Plant 15N recovery rates were greater (i) in the I540 treatments than in the I405 treatments and (ii) in the N360 treatments than in the N240 treatments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1035

t0
“Cotton growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13

Title

Cotton growth and the fate of N fertilizer as affected by saline water irrigation and N fertigation in a drip-irrigated field

Wei Min; Huijuan Guo; Zhiqiang Hu; et al. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science 2017. doi:10.1080/09064710.2017.1338309

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield increased as N amount increased.
Intervention effect Cotton biomass, N uptake and yield were significantly less with saline water (SW) than with fresh water (FW) and brackish water (BW).
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the I540 irrigation treatments than in the I405 treatments.
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 7.98% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 30.01% greater than in saline water (SW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N increased as N fertilizer amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N declined as irrigation amount increased.
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in brackish water (BW) treatments was 6.02% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Residual soil 15N in saline water (SW) treatments was 21.44% greater than in fresh water (FW).
Intervention effect Total 15N recovery was significantly greater in brackish water (BW) than in fresh water (FW) and saline water (SW).
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation amount.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation water salinity.
Intervention effect 15N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in N rate.
Intervention effect The authors suggest that, with appropriate amounts of irrigation water and N fertilizer, brackish irrigation water (4.61 dS/m) will not affect cotton growth, yield and N recovery.
Intervention effect The authors conclude that saline irrigation water (EC > 8 dS/m) reduces cotton growth, yield and N use efficiency.

“rates of recovery growth”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics