View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Average maize starch granule diameter did not differ.
average granule diameter e1 no differences e1 Verbatim
e0 “maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–57 e1 “no differences were observed for average granule diameter . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–856 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen form had little impact on average root diameter .
root average diameter e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 e0 “The impact on root average diameter was not large. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1107 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Nitrogen treatments significantly increased alfalfa root biomass, root surface area, root volume relative to CK. Intervention effect Nitrogen treatments significantly increased alfalfa root activity, root nodule number, nodule weight relative to CK. Intervention effect Nitrogen treatments significantly increased alfalfa nitrogenase activity relative to CK. Association Increasing nitrogen levels increased alfalfa root biomass, root surface area, root volume. Association Increasing nitrogen levels increased alfalfa root activity, root nodule number, nodule weight. Association Increasing nitrogen levels increased alfalfa nitrogenase activity. Observation Mixed nitrate and ammonium gave the highest effects, followed by ammonium and then nitrate. Observation The mixed nitrate and ammonium treatment at 210 mg/L gave maximum values. Observation Root biomass, surface area, activity, nodule number, nodule weight and nitrogenase activity differed significantly across seedling, budding and flowering stages. Observation These root and nitrogenase traits did not differ significantly during seed podding and podding. Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Average plant height and caudex diameter did not differ markedly between groups.
average height and average caudexes diameter e0 no markable differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “no markable differences were found in the average height and average caudexes diameter between the groups ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–959 t0 “Mini-Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Root average diameter showed no marked change under increasing Pb.
root average diameter e0 no marked change e0 Verbatim
e0 “while no marked change was noted for root average diameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–462 e1 “increase of Pb ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–402 t0 “Elsholtzia
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The treatments did not significantly affect average bamboo shoot diameter .
Liangping Pyhllostachys nidularia Munro t0 average diameter of shoot e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “did not significantly affect the average diameter of shoot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–666 t0 “Liangping Pyhllostachys nidularia Munro ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–72 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The second fine-root scenario showed no significant average root diameter change.
average root diameter e0 without significant change e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Prunus hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–96 e0 “increased RTD and decreased SRL without significant change of average root diameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1259 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Average total height, height growth and diameter at breast height did not differ significantly among black walnut families.
Average total height, height growth, and diameter at breast height e1 Verbatim
e0 “Average survival, 7-year stem diameter , and stem diameter growth differed significantly among 34 black walnut families planted in West Virginia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–143 e1 “Average total height, height growth, and diameter at breast height were not significantly different among families ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–259 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pb toxicity did not markedly change root average diameter in Elsholtzia .
root average diameter e2 no marked change e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Elsholtzia
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 t1 “under Pb toxicity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 e2 “while no marked change was noted for root average diameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–463 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No heterosis was detected for average fruit weight, fruit length and fruit diameter .
average fruit weight, fruit length and diameter e2 Verbatim
e0 “Seven elongated eggplant fruit lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–208 e2 “However, no heterosis was detected for average fruit weight, fruit length and diameter ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1248–1333 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Average cell diameter was not related to ripeness stage.
ripeness stage e1 Average diameter of cells e1 no_change inferred e1 Verbatim
t0 “Effect of cell size on mechanics of strawberry fruit tissue ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59 e1 “Average diameter of cells wasn't re-lated to ripeness stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–565 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays
Medicago sativa
Elsholtzia
Juglans nigra
Solanum melongena_single2.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Fragaria