View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cropping sequence generally had little effect on broccoli production.
broccoli production e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sequence generally had little affect on broccoli production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1246 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cropping sequence generally had little effect on broccoli production.
broccoli production e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sequence generally had little affect on broccoli production. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1014 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Rotational cropping sequence had no consistent effect on disease incidence.
rotational cropping sequence e0 disease incidence e0 no consistent effect e0 Verbatim
t0 “pearl millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–26 e0 “There was also no consistent effect of rotational cropping sequence on disease incidence. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1111 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean dry weight was not affected by cropping sequence .
soybean dry weight e1 Verbatim
t0 “Affects Yield of Corn and Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–62 e1 “soybean dry weight was not ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1357 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Previous cropping sequence did not affect soybean yield.
Previous cropping sequence e3 did not affect e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean in a Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–45 e3 “Previous cropping sequence did not affect soybean yield or numbers of H. glycines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–615 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cropping sequence did not change seasonal soybean soil water depletion.
cropping sequence e0 Seasonal soil water depletion e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Seasonal soil water depletion by soybean was not changed by cropping sequence but overall WUE by first‐year soybean was higher than by continuous soybean ( p = 0.05). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1415 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Previous cropping sequence did not affect H. glycines numbers.
Previous cropping sequence e3 numbers of H. glycines e3 did not affect e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean in a Field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–45 e3 “Previous cropping sequence did not affect soybean yield or numbers of H. glycines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–615 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cropping system or sequence did not affect the soil nematode population in barley systems.
Cropping system or sequence e1 nematode population e1 no_change inferred e1 Verbatim
e0 “soil nematode community structure of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 267–332 e1 “Cropping system or sequence did not impact the nematode population ( p > .1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–990 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cropping sequence did not affect wheat response to nitrogen fertilizer.
Response to N fertilizer e0 Verbatim
e0 “Response to N fertilizer was not affected by sequence of cropping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–420 e1 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–55 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cropping sequence did not significantly change yield determining parameters.
cropping sequence e5 that determining yield were not e5 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Irrigated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) performance on calcareous alkaline soils as influenced by previous crops in North of Sudan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–136 e5 “Change in growth parameters as affected by cropping sequence were significant in various levels, however, that determining yield were not ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–855 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Brassica oleracea var. italicae0
Cenchrus americanus
Glycine max
Heterodera glycines.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Triticum aestivum
Phaseolus vulgaris