View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Total corn dry weight was affected by cropping sequence .
Treatmentcropping sequence e1 OutcomeTotal corn dry weight e1 Verbatim
t0 “Affects Yield of Corn and Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–62 e1 “Total corn dry weight was affected by cropping sequence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1326 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cropping sequence and nitrogen source interacted significantly for yield.
Treatmentcropping sequence and nitrogen source e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The interaction of cropping sequence and nitrogen source significantly influenced yield. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–909 t0 “Soybean-based cropping system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–45 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A cluster bean-wheat cropping sequence was the most profitable sequence .
Verbatim
e6 “A cluster bean-wheat cropping sequence proved the most profitable ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1025 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cropping sequence generally had little effect on broccoli production.
Outcomebroccoli production e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sequence generally had little affect on broccoli production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1246 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The pigeonpea-wheat cropping sequence produced maximum net profit.
Treatmentpigeonpea-wheat cropping sequence e0 Verbatim
e0 “a pigeonpea-wheat cropping sequence produced the maximum net profit. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–629 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cropping sequence generally had little effect on broccoli production.
Outcomebroccoli production e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sequence generally had little affect on broccoli production. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1014 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cropping sequence was the most dominant factor influencing weed species composition in the seedbank.
TreatmentCropping sequence e0 Outcomespecies composition in the seedbank e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Cropping sequence was the most dominant factor influencing species composition in the seedbank ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–636 t0 “Weed Seedbank ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The soybean-safflower sequence without fertilizer was the most carbon efficient.
TreatmentSoybean-Safflower cropping sequence with no fertilizer application e0 Outcomecarbon efficient cropping sequence e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Most carbon efficient cropping sequence was Soybean-Safflower cropping sequence with no fertilizer application. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1388 Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cropping sequence , cultivar and metam sodium affected peanut yield.
TreatmentCropping sequence, cultivar, and metam sodium e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Cropping sequence , cultivar, and metam sodium impacted peanut yield and population of PPN in soil. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–835 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Rotational cropping sequence had no consistent effect on disease incidence.
Treatmentrotational cropping sequence e0 Outcomedisease incidence e0 Directionno consistent effect e0 Verbatim
t0 “pearl millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–26 e0 “There was also no consistent effect of rotational cropping sequence on disease incidence. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1111 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.