View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Melatonin effectiveness did not depend on exposure duration.
Outcomeeffectiveness of melatonin e0 Directiondoes not depend on e0 Qualifierduration of exposure e0 Verbatim
e0 “The effectiveness of melatonin does not depend on the duration of exposure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–705 t0 “Barley Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–83 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Longer exposure to organic acid sanitizer did not improve sanitizing effectiveness .
Treatmentincreasing time of exposure to organic acid sanitizer e0 Outcomesanitizing effectiveness e0 Directiondid not increase e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “increasing time of exposure to organic acid sanitizer did not increase sanitizing effectiveness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1139 e1 “baby spinach ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–123 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Extending the exposure period to 6 or 8 h did not increase fumigation effectiveness .
Treatmentextending the exposure period to 6 or 8 h e3 Outcomeeffectiveness of the fumigation e3 Directionno_change inferred e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Ethylene Oxide Fumigation of Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 e3 “extending the exposure period to 6 or 8 h did not increase effectiveness of the fumigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–490 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur dioxide exposure did not reduce maleic hydrazide control of sycamore regrowth.
TreatmentExposure to S0 2 e0 Outcomeeffectiveness of MH in controlling regrowth e0 Directiondid not reduce e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Exposure to S0 2 did not reduce the effectiveness of MH in controlling regrowth of this species. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–301 t0 “American Sycamore ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–71 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
UV-B exposure did not affect UV-absorbing compound concentration.
Outcomeconcentration of UV‐absorbing compounds e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The concentration of UV‐absorbing compounds was unaffected by UV‐B exposure , but generally increased with leaf age. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1404 t0 “Pinus taeda ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Exposure to -5 °C for 72 hours did not affect the eating quality of cooked rice.
Treatmentexposure of -5oC temperature within 72 hours e5 Outcomeeating quality of cooked rice e5 Qualifierin terms of aroma, stickiness, taste, color and overall acceptability e5 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The storage of rice is part of the post-harvest system where the food passes from field to consumer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 e5 “The eating quality of cooked rice in terms of aroma, stickiness, taste, color and overall acceptability was not affected from the exposure of -5oC temperature within 72 hours (three days) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1639 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cyantraniliprole alone gave protection comparable to its ASM combination at 24 h insect exposure .
TreatmentCyantraniliprole used alone e0 Interactorviruliferous insects e0 pest Qualifier24 h after product application e0 Comparatorits combination with ASM e0 Verbatim
e0 “The efficacy of Cyantraniliprole used alone was comparable to that obtained with its combination with ASM only when plants were exposed to viruliferous insects for 24 h after product application, and the effectiveness of protection decreased with increasing time of exposure to viruliferous thrips. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2442–2740 t0 “PEPPER ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Exposure to -5 °C for 72 hours did not affect the weight of the grains.
Treatmentexposure of -5oC temperature within 72 hours e5 Outcomeweight of grains e6 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The storage of rice is part of the post-harvest system where the food passes from field to consumer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 e5 “The eating quality of cooked rice in terms of aroma, stickiness, taste, color and overall acceptability was not affected from the exposure of -5oC temperature within 72 hours (three days) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1639 e6 “In term of weight of grains also not affected at all after the treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1713 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
PyGanic and Aza-Direct residual exposure gave no significant difference in fly mortality after 48 h from the water control.
TreatmentPyGanic, Aza-Direct e1 Directionno significant differences e1 Comparatorwater control e1 Verbatim
t0 “Organic Management of Blueberry Maggot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–94 e0 “Laboratory and field assays using insecticides for organic pest management were conducted on the blueberry maggot, Rhagoletis mendax Curran ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–139 e1 “In this assay, there were no significant differences in fly mortality after 48 h among treatments of PyGanic, Aza-Direct, and the water control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–814 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Eating quality of cooked rice was not affected by three heat-treatment exposure s.
Treatmentmultiple exposure (3 times) to the heat treatment e4 Outcomeeating quality of cooked rice e4 Verbatim
e4 “The eating quality of cooked rice in terms of the aroma, stickiness, taste, texture, colour and overall acceptability was not affected from the multiple exposure (3 times) to the heat treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1333 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.