View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
These insecticidal plants had no phytotoxic effect .
Taxonchinese insecticidal plants t0 Outcomephytotoxic effect e0 Verbatim
e0 “These insecticidal plants have no phytotoxic effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3089–3140 t0 “chinese insecticidal plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–44 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Crude extract had no significant insecticidal effect .
Directionno significant e0 Verbatim
t0 “Maerua siamensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–79 e0 “no significant insecticidal or nematocidal effect s were observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1018 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The insecticidal treatments had no phytotoxic effect on tomato.
Treatmentinsecticidal treatments e1 Outcomephytotoxic effect e1 Qualifierdid not have any e1 Verbatim
e1 “The insecticidal treatments were safe to coccinellids and Chrysopa and did not have any phytotoxic effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–863 t0 “armigera in tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Coating method had no effect on insecticidal activity.
TreatmentCoating method e0 Outcomeinsecticidal activity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “soldier fly damage to ryegrass seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–53 e0 “Coating method had no effect on insecticidal activity, although seedling growth and subsequent pasture production were greater from ryegrass seed loaded with fertiliser than from experimental or commercial (‘Prillcote’) dressings incorporating insecticide only ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–406 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Biological preparations had no residual insecticidal or repellent effect on major crop pollinators.
TreatmentBiological preparations e0 Interactormajor crop pollinators e0 pollinator Outcomeresidual insecticidal or repellent effect e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
t0 “sunflower crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–69 e0 “Biological preparations had no residual insecticidal or repellent effect on major crop pollinators ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1431 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Low-temperature drying did not alter the amounts of known insecticidal constituents in pyrethrum flowers.
Outcomeamounts of the known insecticidal constituents e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was no effect of drying on the amounts of the known insecticidal constituents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–282 t0 “pyrethrum flowers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Insecticidal seed dressing showed no negative effect on germination energy or germination.
Treatmentinsecticidal seed dressing e0 Outcomegermination energy and germination e0 DirectionNo negative effects e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “No negative effect s of insecticidal seed dressing on germination energy and germination were observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–753 t0 “alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–111 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Insecticidal control of aphids had no effect on TEV disease progress in tobacco.
Treatmentinsecticidal control of aphids e3 Outcomedisease progress e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “Aphid colonization had no effect on the distribution of TEV infections in tobacco, and insecticidal control of aphids had no effect on disease progress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–436 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Insecticidal soap had no significant effect on whitefly eggs.
TreatmentInsecticidal soap e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Insecticidal soap and N. gossei extract were all effect ive on young nymphs, even at very low rates (LC50, 0.15% and 0.08 g [AI]/liter, respectively), but had no significant effect on eggs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1681 e1 “developmental stages of the whitefly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1275 t0 “Tomato Leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–102 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Aqueous extracts had no insecticidal effect .
Treatmentaqueous extracts e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “aqueous extracts have no effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–788 t0 “Ruta chalepensis (L.): Phytochemical study and bioinsecticidal effect against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.