View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Bean weevil and parasitoid performance were not correlated.
Second interactorparasitoid e0 biocontrol_agent Outcomebeetle and parasitoid performance e0 Directionnot correlated e0 Verbatim
t0 “wild common bean populations, Phaseolus vulgaris L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–334 e0 “beetle and parasitoid performance were not correlated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1015 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Aphid and parasitoid performance were uncorrelated.
Outcomeaphid and parasitoid performance e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “aphid and parasitoid performance was not correlated. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–814 e1 “the aphid Myzus persicae and its endoparasitoid Diaeretiella rapae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–222 e2 “Brassica napus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–256 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Caterpillar and parasitoid performance was consistent among host plants.
Interactorcaterpillar e0 pest Outcomeperformance metrics e0 Verbatim
e0 “performance metrics of both the caterpillar and parasitoid were consistent among host plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–997 e1 “three varieties of cultivated Brassica oleracea (L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–686 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Parasitoid (Cotesia melanoscelus) performance did not vary in relation to CO2 environment (ambient versus elevated).
TaxonCotesia melanoscelus e2 TreatmentCO[sub 2] environment e0 OutcomeParasitoid performance e3 Directionnot in relation e0 Verbatim
e0 “not in relation to CO[sub 2] environment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–922 e1 “grown under ambient or elevated CO[sub 2] conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–277 e2 “the parasitoid Cotesia melanoscelus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–186 e3 “Parasitoid performance varied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–843 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Field parasitoid performance did not differ statistically between sole and intercropped plots.
Treatmentintercropped plot e0 Outcomeparasitoid performance e0 Directionno statistical difference e0 Settingfield experiment e0 Verbatim
e0 “In the field experiment using sentinel egg card technique no statistical difference in parasitoid performance between the sole crop and intercropped plot was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–711 t0 “brinjal ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–144 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative humidity did not affect parasitoid performance in the stated humidity range.
Directiondid not affect e0 Settingrelative humidity e0 Verbatim
e0 “the relative humidity (66% ~ 77%) did not affect their performance . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1170 e1 “pests posing a great threat to crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–148 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil treatments did not affect parasitoid performance .
TreatmentSoil treatments e5 Outcomeparasitoid performance e5 Directionno_change inferred e5 Comparatorsterilized soil e4 Verbatim
e0 “we selected two white cabbage cultivars [Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata (Brassicaceae)] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–680 e1 “Aboveground, we quantified aphid [Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)] population development and parasitoid [Diaeretiella rapae (McIntosh) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)] fitness parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1167 e4 “we inoculated soils of the cultivars with either nematodes or microorganisms and included a sterilized soil as a control treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–966 e5 “Soil treatments did not affect parasitoid performance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1412 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No interaction between cabbage cultivar and soil treatment was found for aphid population growth or parasitoid performance .
Treatmentsoil treatment e6 Outcomeaphid population growth or parasitoid performance e6 Directionno_change inferred e6 Verbatim
e0 “we selected two white cabbage cultivars [Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata (Brassicaceae)] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–680 e1 “Aboveground, we quantified aphid [Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)] population development and parasitoid [Diaeretiella rapae (McIntosh) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)] fitness parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1167 e6 “no interactions were found between cultivar and soil treatment for aphid population growth or parasitoid performance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1764 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Companion plants did not significantly affect parasitoid performance in cages.
Treatmentcompanion plant e0 Outcomeperformance of parasitoids e0 Directiondid not significantly affect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The presence of a companion plant did not significantly affect the performance of parasitoid s, in the cage experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1516 t0 “Lablab purpureus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–112 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The primary parasitoid performed similarly on moths reared from sensitive fern and marsh fern.
Interactorprimary parasitoid e2 parasite Verbatim
e2 “The primary parasitoid performed similarly on moths reared from both ferns ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1003–1077 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.