View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Simultaneous fungicide seed treatment did not significantly influence the yield effect of strain 1008.
simultaneous seed treatment with a fungicide e0 no significant influence e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “with no significant influence of the simultaneous seed treatment with a fungicide ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–638 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Simultaneous and relay intercropping had no significant effect on weed biomass.
annual arable intercrops e0 simultaneous vs. relay intercropping e5 No significant effects e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “quantify the effect of intercropping on weed biomass in annual arable intercrops grown for their final product ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–458 e5 “No significant effects on weed biomass were found of simultaneous vs. relay intercropping, and of nitrogen fertilizer input ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1801–1924 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Simultaneous knockout of all three TaHRC homoeologs in AK58 did not give rise to FHB resistance.
simultaneous knockout of all three TaHRC homoeologs e0 did not give rise to e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “simultaneous knockout of all three TaHRC homoeologs in AK58 did not give rise to FHB resistance either ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 6464–6566 t0 “Locus in Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–129 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect In SM3, Tapft, Tahrc-3B and Tapft/Tahrc-3B null mutant lines showed high FHB resistance similar to wild-type SM3 in greenhouse and field. Intervention effect Seven null mutant lines of TaHRC homoeologs in SM3 did not differ significantly in FHB resistance from wild-type SM3. Intervention effect In ZM7698, the single mutant lines AAbbDD and AABBdd had significantly fewer diseased spikelets than ZM7698 WT across three environments. Intervention effect In ZM7698, AABBdd lines had a further decline of diseased spikelets compared with AAbbDD lines. Intervention effect In ZM7698, the double (aaBBdd) and triple (aabbdd) mutant lines did not differ significantly from WT in number of diseased spikelets. Intervention effect In AK58, AAbbDD and AABBdd lines had significantly fewer diseased spikelets than WT. Intervention effect In AK58, the AABBdd line showed superior FHB resistance over the AAbbDD line across two environments. Observation In ZM7698 and AK58 wheat spikelets, TaHRC-3B and especially TaHRC-3D were expressed much higher than TaHRC-3A after inoculation. Intervention effect TaHRC homoeolog mutations had no negative effects on major agronomic traits in ZM7698 and AK58. Intervention effect In JM22, Tahrc mutant lines AAbbDD, AABBdd and aabbdd did not differ significantly from WT in number of diseased spikelets. Mechanism Tahrc-3B rather than TaPFT is responsible for Fhb1-mediated FHB resistance in SM3. Intervention effect Compared with Tahrc-3B, Tahrc-3D increases FHB resistance in the two tested elite varieties. Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The duration of the initial simultaneous phase remained unchanged across light environments.
different light availability e0 duration of this phase e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–34 e0 “plants grown under different light availability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–199 e1 “The duration of this phase remained unchanged across environments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–533 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Deviation from regression was not significant for Co 6304 only, by both univariate and multivariate analysis .
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “three important traits of sugarcane, viz. yield, ccs and sucrose ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–231 e7 “Deviation was observed to be not significant for Co 6304 only ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1440 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Regression of Co 87021 was not significant when tested by multivariate analysis .
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “three important traits of sugarcane, viz. yield, ccs and sucrose ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–231 e4 “In these genotypes regressions were found to be not significant for two traits only and resulted not significance for Co 87021 and Co 6304 but significant for Co 7219 when tested by multivariate analysis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1266 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Regression of Co 6304 was not significant when tested by multivariate analysis .
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “three important traits of sugarcane, viz. yield, ccs and sucrose ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–231 e4 “In these genotypes regressions were found to be not significant for two traits only and resulted not significance for Co 87021 and Co 6304 but significant for Co 7219 when tested by multivariate analysis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1266 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Results did not differ significantly from the external standard method.
no significant difference e0 external standard method e0 Verbatim
e0 “The results had no significant difference compared with the external standard method. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1288 t0 “rhubarb ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–84 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
QAMS and the external standard method yielded no significant differences for four lignanoids in 13 S. chinensis batches.
quantitative results of four lignanoids e0 No significant differences e0 external standard method e0 Verbatim
e0 “No significant differences were found in the quantitative results of four lignanoids in 13 batches of S. chinensis determined by external standard method and QAMS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–949 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The single-reference-standard (SRS) method gave no significant difference from the multiple-reference-standard (MRS) method for quantifying seven flavonoids in Oroxylum indicum seed.
simultaneous quantitative determination of seven bioactive flavonoids e2 Verbatim
e1 “the seed of Oroxylum indicum L., a traditional Chinese herb ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–905 e2 “both MRS and SRS methods were established for the simultaneous quantitative determination of seven bioactive flavonoids in Muhudie (MHD) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–844 e3 “no statistically significant difference was observed by a T-test (P > 0.05), thus, the SRS method can be applied for quality analysis of MHD ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1165 Other claims from this paper (1) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0
Helianthus annuus
Rheum rhabarbarum
Schisandra chinensis
Oroxylum indicum