View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
CO2 did not affect mesophyll surface area per unit leaf area .
OutcomeSurface area of the mesophyll per unit leaf area e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybeans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 e0 “Surface area of the mesophyll per unit leaf area was unaffected by CO2. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–344 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Surface - area estimates from the three instruments did not differ significantly from directly measured total surface area .
Directionnot significantly different e0 Comparatordirectly measured total (leaf + branch + stem) surface areas e0 Verbatim
e0 “Surface area s estimated by the three instruments were not significantly different from directly measured total (leaf + branch + stem) surface area s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1034 e1 “individual Retama sphaerocarpa bushes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–230 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The cotton mesophyll surface area to leaf area ratio did not change appreciably under nutrient stress.
Outcomeratio of mesophyll surface area to leaf area e1 Directiondid not change appreciably e1 Verbatim
e0 “Gossypium hirsutum L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–64 e1 “the ratio of mesophyll surface area to leaf area did not change appreciably ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–445 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Exposed mesophyll cell surface area per unit leaf surface area was unchanged by treatment.
Treatmentbenzyladenine (BA) or kinetin e1 Outcomeexposed mesophyll cell surface area e2 Qualifierexpressed per unit leaf surface area e2 Comparatorcontrol plants e2 Verbatim
t0 “Cytokinin Effects on Leaf Architecture inPhaseolus vulgarisL. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 e1 “with benzyladenine (BA) or kinetin at 0.5 mM for five consecutive days resulted in thicker leaves showing a significant decrease in intercellular air space volume ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–269 e2 “Compared with control plants, exposed mesophyll cell surface area was lower per unit tissue volume, but unchanged when expressed per unit leaf surface area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–426 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity did not significantly change mesophyll cell surface area relative to leaf area .
Outcomeratio of mesophyll cell surface area to leaf area e0 Directionno significant differences e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “no significant differences in the ratio of mesophyll cell surface area to leaf area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1035 t0 “Distichlis spicata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–103 e1 “high substrate salinity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–272 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The ratio between leaf area and feeder root area was not affected by HLB or copper.
Treatmenteither treatment e2 Outcomeratio between evaporative surface area (leaf surface area) and the uptake surface area of roots e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “the ratio between evaporative surface area (leaf surface area ) and the uptake surface area of roots (feeder root surface area ) was not affected by either treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1154 t0 “Interaction of Huanglongbing and Foliar Applications of Copper on Water Relations of Citrus sinensis cv. Valencia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Mesophyll cell surface area per leaf area was not significantly correlated with soybean photosynthetic rate.
Organ / stagemesophyll cell surface area per unit leaf area e0 Outcomenet photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–100 e0 “The net photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area was correlated significantly and positively with the average mesophyll cell surface area , but not significantly with the mesophyll cell surface area per unit leaf area . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–486 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Woodlot surface area did not affect vascular plant richness in chestnut woodlots.
Treatmentsurface area of the woodlot e0 Directiondid not affect e0 Verbatim
e0 “the surface area of the woodlot did not affect the richness of vascular plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–414 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Woodlot surface area did not affect ant richness in chestnut woodlots.
Treatmentsurface area of the woodlot e0 Directiondid not affect e0 Verbatim
e0 “the surface area of the woodlot did not affect the richness of vascular plants and ants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–423 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fungal colonization did not increase maize root surface area .
Treatmentfungal colonization e0 Outcomeroot surface area e0 Directiondid not produce an increase e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “fungal colonization did not produce an increase in root surface area of maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–819 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.