View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod surface area was 72% greater than kernel surface area .
Verbatim
t0 “groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 e0 “surface area was 72% more than that of the kernel ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–470 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation TMV2 groundnut pods had mean length, width, and thickness of 24.32, 11.13, and 11.56 mm. Observation TMV2 groundnut pod 1000-unit mass was 798.23 g. Observation TMV2 groundnut kernels had mean length, width, and thickness of 10.32, 6.86, and 6.72 mm. Observation TMV2 groundnut kernel 1000-unit mass was 294.89 g. Observation Pod sphericity was 21.33% less than kernel sphericity. Observation Pod bulk density was 255.66 kg m-3. Observation Kernel bulk density was 547.03 kg m-3. Observation Pod true density was 470.06 kg m-3. Observation Kernel true density was 950.33 kg m-3. Observation Pod and kernel porosities were 44.36% and 41.72%, respectively. Observation Pod and kernel angles of repose were 30.99 and 39.610, respectively. Observation The coefficient of friction was highest for GI sheet at 0.43. Observation The coefficient of friction for plywood was 0.31. Observation The coefficient of friction was lowest for plastic sheet at 0.22. Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf surface area could be calculated by subtracting measured branch area from estimated total area .
Leaf surface area e0 directly measured branch surface area e0 Verbatim
e0 “Leaf surface area could be calculated from estimated total surface area minus directly measured branch surface area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1151 e1 “individual Retama sphaerocarpa bushes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–230 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Sphere and ellipsoid models gave poor correlation between predicted and actual apple fruit surface area .
correlation between predicted surface area and actual surface area e2 actual surface area e2 Verbatim
e0 “estimating surface area s of apple fruit (Malus domestica Borkh.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–318 e2 “poor correlation between predicted surface area and actual surface area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–570 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Branch surface area was the most appropriate predictor of supported leaf surface area .
leaf surface area supported by the branch e0 most appropriate e0 Branch surface area e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Branch surface area was determined to be the most appropriate predictor of leaf surface area supported by the branch ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–749 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Liquid surface tension did not significantly affect surface area measurements.
surface tension of the liquid e0 surface area measurements e0 no significant effects e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there were no significant effects on the surface area measurements of the surface tension of the liquid ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2128–2231 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
CO2 uptake rate decreased as the needle surface area to root surface area ratio decreased.
needle surface area/root surface area ratio e1 Carbon dioxide uptake rate e1 Verbatim
e0 “Plantlets of Douglas-fir ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 e1 “Carbon dioxide uptake rate increased with increasing root number, and decreased as the needle surface area /root surface area ratio decreased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–627 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Stem surface area is considerable but smaller than leaf surface area .
Verbatim
e0 “The stems possess a considerable surface area , although less than that of the leaves. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–159 t0 “Isodon rubescens
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The finite element method reliably predicted surface area of small Royal Gala and Braeburn apples.
reliably predicted e4 actual surface area e5 Verbatim
e0 “estimating surface area s of apple fruit (Malus domestica Borkh.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–318 e4 “reliably predicted surface area of small ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–775 e5 “had reasonably close correlation with actual surface area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–872 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The finite element method marginally overestimated apple fruit surface area .
finite elements e3 marginally overestimated e3 actual surface area e5 Verbatim
e0 “estimating surface area s of apple fruit (Malus domestica Borkh.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–318 e3 “A method based on finite elements marginally overestimated surface area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–730 e5 “had reasonably close correlation with actual surface area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–872 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf surface area at harvest was 13 times woody tissue surface area .
surface area of the leaves e0 woody tissues e0 Verbatim
e0 “The surface area of the leaves at harvest was 13 times that of the woody tissues ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–786 e1 “Malus domestica Borkh.
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–95 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Arachis hypogaea
Retama sphaerocarpa
Malus domestica
Pseudotsuga menziesii.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Isodon rubescens