View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
DBh -47 x Arka Anamika and DBh -47 x DBh -30 followed the leading cross for SCA effect.
Verbatim
e0 “followed by DBh -47 x Arka Anamika and DBh -47 x DBh -30 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–835 t0 “Okra ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–81 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The final model included dbh , log( dbh ), stocking density, maximum dbh and competition from smaller trees.
Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “The final model comprised of this information dbh , log( dbh ), stocking density, maximum dbh , and competition from trees smaller than the subject tree. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1177 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
CA– DBH and H– DBH allometries diverged from geometric similarity.
CA-DBH and H-DBH allometries e0 Verbatim
e0 “both the CA- DBH and H- DBH allometries diverged from the geometric similarity model ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1247 t0 “associated trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–89 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Models predicting the minimum DBH , mean DBH and DBH variance had R2 from 0.7186 to 0.9747.
Major Coniferous Species t0 coefficient of determination (R2) e1 Verbatim
t0 “Major Coniferous Species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–67 e1 “The coefficient of determination (R2) for the models predicting the minimum DBH , the mean DBH , and the DBH variance ranged from 0.7186 to 0.9747 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1367 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The optimal parameter recovery method used the minimum DBH , mean DBH and DBH variance.
Major Coniferous Species t0 optimal parameter recovery method e3 ten parameter recovery methods e4 Verbatim
t0 “Major Coniferous Species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–67 e3 “The optimal parameter recovery method was the one using the minimum DBH , the mean DBH , and the DBH variance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1221 e4 “ten parameter recovery methods were compared using moment-based, percentile-based, and hybrid approaches ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–782 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree DBH , relative DBH , age, and dominant-tree mean DBH significantly influenced component carbon concentration.
carbon concentration e0 across all tree components e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Tree diameter at breast height ( DBH ), Relative DBH (Rd), tree age (Age) and mean DBH of dominant trees (Ddom) exerted significant influences on the carbon concentration across all tree components. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–804 t0 “Larix olgensis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–98 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
More than half of trees at least 20 cm dbh were in the 20-39 cm dbh class.
20-39 cm dbh class e0 Verbatim
e0 “Among trees ≥20 cm dbh ,>50 % were within the 20-39 cm dbh class ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1155 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
DBH evenness and dominance varied opposite to DBH richness and diversity among secondary forests.
DBH evenness index and dominance index e0 DBH richness index and diversity index e0 Verbatim
e0 “DBH evenness index and dominance index changed oppositely to DBH richness index and diversity index among three secondary forests ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1129 t0 “Tree Species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thinning significantly affected DBH and height allometry, height to DBH ratio, and crown width.
allometry of DBH with height, height-DBH ratio (HDR) and CW e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Thinning had a significant effect on allometry of DBH with height, height- DBH ratio (HDR) and CW. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1126 t0 “Eucalyptus diversicolor
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–68 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Smaller (10-30 cm dbh ) and larger trees ( dbh > 60 cm) produced significantly fewer fruits.
smaller (10-30 cm dbh) and larger trees (dbh > 60 cm) e5 Verbatim
e5 “smaller (10-30 cm dbh ) and larger trees ( dbh > 60 cm) produced significantly fewer fruits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–974 t0 “Carapa guianensis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–37 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0
Larix gmelinii var. olgensis
Eucalyptus diversicolor.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Carapa guianensis