Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased nitrogen accumulation enhanced agronomic and recovery nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome: agronomic nitrogen use efficiency and recovery nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction: enhancede0

Verbatim

e0
“enhanced agronomic nitrogen use efficiency and recovery nitrogen use efficiency”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–905

t0
“cotton”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–22

Title

Integrated soil-cotton management system enhances nitrogen use efficiency under different soil fertility levels

Xinyue Zhang; Hongkun Yang; Rizwan Zahoor; et al. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2019. doi:10.1080/03650340.2019.1697874

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Integrated management increased soil available nitrogen 9.5–21.2% in middle and later growth stages.
Intervention effect Integrated management improved average nitrogen accumulation rate 30.4–36.2%.
Intervention effect Integrated management improved maximum nitrogen accumulation rate 39.9–45.1%.
Intervention effect Integrated management postponed onset of rapid nitrogen accumulation by 3–6 days.
Intervention effect Integrated management raised final nitrogen accumulation 32.5–38.3%.
Observation Increased nitrogen accumulation improved leaf area index, leaf area duration, and boll number.
Recommendation Authors suggest omitting nitrogen fertilizer on more fertile soil under integrated management.
Observation Integrated management diminished the decline in nitrogen use efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased agronomic nitrogen-use efficiency and nitrogen recovery efficiency.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: Sie0
Outcome: Agronomic N use efficiency and N recovery efficiencye0
Direction: highere0
Comparator: without Sie0

Verbatim

e0
“Agronomic N use efficiency and N recovery efficiency were higher with Si compared to without Si.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1270

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76

t1
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76

Title

Silicon enhances yield and nitrogen use efficiency of tropical low land rice

Sangita Mohanty; A. K. Nayak; C. K. Swain; et al. Agronomy Journal 2020. doi:10.1002/agj2.20087

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Silicon increased rice crop growth rate at all nitrogen levels.
Intervention effect Silicon reduced flag leaf angle.
Intervention effect Silicon enhanced flag leaf nitrogen content.
Intervention effect Silicon increased leaf chlorophyll concentration at flowering.
Intervention effect Silicon increased single-leaf photosynthesis rate at flowering.
Intervention effect Nitrogen and silicon significantly affected panicle number and grain filling.
Intervention effect The 200 kg silicon dioxide and 100 kg nitrogen rates produced the highest panicle number, filled grains and yield.
Intervention effect Silicon raised rice yield by 8.2–16.9% relative to no silicon.
Intervention effect Nitrogen and silicon significantly affected nitrogen uptake and nitrogen-use efficiency.
Intervention effect The highest physiological nitrogen-use efficiency occurred at 200 kg silicon dioxide and 80 kg nitrogen.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake, agronomic N use efficiency and apparent N recovery increased.

Outcome: nitrogen uptake, agronomic N use efficiency and apparent N recoverye0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“nitrogen uptake, agronomic N use efficiency and apparent N recovery also increased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–563

Title

Leaching losses and use efficiency of N in rice as influenced by modified gypsum urea

Ashok Kumar Tripathi; Tarjit Singh; Machiavelli Singh Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 1997

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Nitrogen leaching was 12.27 percent with urea and 10.43 percent with gypsum urea.
Observation Most leached nitrogen was ammonium, followed by nitrate and urea.
Intervention effect Higher nitrogen levels significantly increased nitrogen losses.
Intervention effect Gypsum urea reduced leaching loss relative to urea.
Observation Grain and straw yield increased.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 120 kg/ha enhanced wheat grain yield, agronomic nitrogen-use efficiency and nitrogen recovery efficiency.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: Nitrogen application @ 120 kg/hae0
Outcome: grain yield, Agronomic N-use efficiency and N recovery efficiencye0
Direction: enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Nitrogen application @ 120 kg/ha enhanced grain yield, Agronomic N-use efficiency and N recovery efficiency in Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1399

Title

Enhancing productivity of wheat-maize cropping sequence on a sandy loam soil

Sanjeev Kumar Gupta; Mainak Ghosh; Reena Gupta; et al. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2016

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Biofertilizer seed inoculation significantly increased wheat plant height over control in both years.
Intervention effect Biofertilizer inoculation had no significant residual effect on maize plant height.
Intervention effect Fertilizer nitrogen at 60 kg ha−1 produced taller wheat and maize than control in both seasons.
Intervention effect Fertilizer nitrogen at 120 kg ha−1 produced taller wheat and maize than control in both seasons.
Intervention effect Nitrogen at 60 kg ha−1 significantly increased maize leaf area index.
Intervention effect Nitrogen at 120 kg ha−1 significantly increased maize leaf area index.
Intervention effect Rhizobacteria inoculation increased wheat grain yield by 5.96% over control.
Intervention effect Azotobacter inoculation increased wheat grain yield by 7.55% over control.
Intervention effect The wheat outcomes under 60 versus 120 kg N/ha did not differ significantly.
Intervention effect Rhizobacteria increased wheat straw yield by 9.23% over no inoculation.
Intervention effect Azotobacter increased wheat straw yield by 7.27% over no inoculation.
Intervention effect Nitrogen up to 60 kg ha−1 significantly increased wheat straw yield over control in both years.
Intervention effect Each increase in applied nitrogen up to 120 kg/ha significantly increased maize stover yield in both years.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased apparent nitrogen recovery and agronomic nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon: MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment: mulchinge0
Outcome: apparent N recovery and agronomic N use efficiencye0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–53

e0
“The apparent N recovery and agronomic N use efficiency increased significantly but physiological N use efficiency decreased under mulching.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1279

Title

Yield and Input Use Efficiency of Maize (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Crop Residue Mulch, Irrigation and Nitrogen Management

Sumanta Chatterjee; K.K. Bandyopadhyay; R. Singh; et al. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2017. doi:10.5958/0974-0228.2017.00023.8

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Irrigation increased maize grain yield by 31 per cent relative to rainfed conditions in 2012.
Intervention effect Crop residue mulch increased maize grain yield by 11.5 per cent in 2012 relative to no mulch.
Intervention effect Crop residue mulch increased maize grain yield by 28.4 per cent in 2013 relative to no mulch.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application increased maize grain yield relative to the control.
Intervention effect Grain and biomass yields did not differ significantly between 75 and 150 kg N ha-1.
Intervention effect Mulch increased maize water use efficiency by 12.6 per cent in 2012.
Intervention effect Mulch increased maize water use efficiency by 36 per cent in 2013.
Intervention effect Mulching decreased physiological nitrogen use efficiency.
Recommendation The authors recommend 75 kg N ha-1 with wheat residue mulch at 10 t ha-1 for higher yield and resource efficiency in the Upper-Indo-Gangetic Plain.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 significantly increased nitrogen recovery efficiency and agronomic nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment: N3 treatmente0
Outcome: N recovery efficiency and the agronomic N use efficiencye0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The N3 treatment also significantly increased the N recovery efficiency and the agronomic N use efficiency”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1357

e1
“The N3 treatment also significantly increased the N recovery efficiency and the agronomic N use efficiency”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1357

t0
“of peanut under different nitrogen management systems”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–104

Title

Grain yield, and nitrogen uptake and translocation of peanut under different nitrogen management systems in a wheat–peanut rotation

Zhaoxin Liu; Fang Gao; Ying Li; et al. Agronomy Journal 2020. doi:10.1002/agj2.20065

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect N2 increased peanut pod yield by 19.0% relative to N1.
Intervention effect N3 increased peanut pod yield by 24.8% relative to N1.
Intervention effect N3 increased fertilizer-derived nitrogen in peanut and its distribution to pods.
Intervention effect N3 raised peanut nitrogen uptake across growth stages by 20.7 to 30.4% relative to N2.
Intervention effect N3 increased nitrogen harvest index and apparent nitrogen recovery efficiency relative to N2.
Intervention effect N3 reduced apparent nitrogen loss.
Recommendation The authors recommend the N3 nitrogen schedule for wheat–peanut relay intercropping in China.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen significantly decreased agronomic use efficiency, partial factor productivity and apparent recovery efficiency.

Taxon: radishRaphanus sativuse0
Treatment: increasing N applicatione0
Outcome: N agronomic use efficiency,partial factor productivity and apparent recovery efficiencye0
Direction: decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“with the increasing N application,N agronomic use efficiency,partial factor productivity and apparent recovery efficiency of the radish decreased significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1067

Title

Effects of Nitrogen Application on Yield and Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization of Radish

Wang Qing-fan Anhui nongye kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Root yield and nutrient contents and accumulations increased significantly from 0 to 160 kg N / hm2.
Observation At 120 kg N / hm2 root yield was 6. 42 × 104 kg/hm2.
Observation At 120 kg N / hm2 nitrogen accumulation was 68.15 kg/hm2.
Observation At 120 kg N / hm2 phosphorus accumulation was 11.78 kg/hm2.
Observation At 120 kg N / hm2 potassium accumulation was 87.18 kg/hm2.
Intervention effect Stem and leaf nitrogen content increased with nitrogen application.
Recommendation The authors recommended 120 kg N / hm2 for yield and environmental benefits.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency, N agronomic efficiency and applied N recovery decreased as the N rate increased in winter wheat.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: N ratee2
Outcome: Nitrogen use efficiency, N agronomic efficiency, and applied N recoverye2
Direction: decreasede2

Verbatim

e1
“winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–174

e2
“Nitrogen use efficiency, N agronomic efficiency, and applied N recovery decreased as the N rate increased”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1164

Title

Tillage and nitrogen rate effects on winter wheat yield in a wheat–sorghum rotation

Mosaed A. Majrashi; Augustine K. Obour; Colby J. Moorberg; et al. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 2023. doi:10.1139/cjss-2023-0028

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea plus pressmud produced higher nitrogen use efficiency, agronomic efficiency, and apparent nitrogen recovery.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Treatment: 50 % N through urea + 50% N through pressmude0
Outcome: Nitrogen use efficiency, Agronomic efficiency (AE), Apparent nitrogen recovery (ANR)e0
Direction: highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Plots received with 50 % N through urea + 50% N through pressmud registered higher values of Nitrogen use efficiency, Agronomic efficiency (AE), Apparent nitrogen recovery (ANR), physiological efficiency and Internal efficiency.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1214

t0
“rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–139

Title

Grain yield, nutrient uptake and nitrogen use efficiency as influenced by different sources of vermicompost and fertilizer nitrogen in rice

S. Ramesh Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect The urea plus pressmud vermicompost treatment produced higher dry matter production.
Intervention effect The same fertilizer treatment produced higher grain yield.
Intervention effect The same fertilizer treatment significantly influenced nutrient uptake.
Intervention effect Urea plus pressmud produced higher physiological and internal efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen rates decreased nitrogen use, uptake, recovery and agronomic efficiencies.

Taxon: SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment: higher ratese0
Outcome: N use efficiency, N uptake efficiency, N recovery efficiency, and Agronomic efficiencye0
Direction: decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“higher rates decreased N use efficiency, N uptake efficiency, N recovery efficiency, and Agronomic efficiency”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1653

t0
“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28

Title

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Growth, Productivity, Nitrogen Removal, N- Use Efficiencies and Economics in Relation to Genotypes and Nitrogen Nutrition in Kellem- Wollega Zone of Ethiopia, East Africa

Sheleme Kaba Shamme; Cherukuri V Raghavaiah Advances in Crop Science and Technology 2016. doi:10.4172/2329-8863.1000218

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Nitrogen rates significantly affected flowering and physiological maturity timing.
Intervention effect Nitrogen rates significantly affected lodging, leaf area, leaf area index and green leaf number.
Intervention effect Nitrogen rates significantly affected biological yield, grain yield and harvest index.
Intervention effect Nitrogen rates significantly affected nitrogen use efficiency.
Association Nitrogen rate and sorghum genotype interacted significantly for most measured parameters.
Intervention effect The Lalo variety at 92 kg N ha had significantly higher grain productivity than all other genotype and nitrogen combinations.
Observation Sorghum genotypes varied in nitrogen uptake, partitioning and nitrogen use efficiency among leaves, stems and grain.
Intervention effect Higher applied nitrogen increased nitrogen uptake, utilization efficiency and harvest index.
Intervention effect Applying 92 kg N ha-1 gave a higher net return.
Observation Lalo had the highest net return and benefit to cost ratio compared with Local variety.

“agronomic nitrogen use efficiency and recovery nitrogen use efficiency”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics