View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The sequence capture array had extremely high capture efficiency in Populus .
Outcomecapture efficiency e0 Verbatim
e0 “Our sequence capture array has extremely high capture efficiency within the genera Populus and Salix ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–845 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The sequence capture array had extremely high capture efficiency in Salix .
Outcomecapture efficiency e0 Verbatim
e0 “Our sequence capture array has extremely high capture efficiency within the genera Populus and Salix ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–845 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Capture efficiency was similar between the two accessions.
Outcomecapture efficiency e0 Comparatortwo accessions e0 Verbatim
e0 “The capture efficiency was similar between the two accessions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–951 e1 “Gossypium hirsutum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–499 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
More intensive crop rotations did not improve precipitation capture efficiency .
OutcomePrecipitation capture efficiency e0 Comparatormore intensive rotations e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Precipitation capture efficiency was not greater with more intensive rotations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–522 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Ant capture efficiency was 0.37%.
OutcomeEfficiency of capture of ants e0 Verbatim
e0 “Efficiency of capture of ants was even lower at 0.37%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–691 t0 “Sarracenia purpurea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–51 t1 “Sarracenia purpurea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–51 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Elevated CO2 did not affect radiation capture efficiency or carbon use efficiency .
Treatmentelevated [CO2] e0 Outcomeradiation capture efficiency nor carbon use efficiency e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Neither radiation capture efficiency nor carbon use efficiency were affected by elevated [CO2] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–687 e1 “wheat (Triticum aestivum L. Veery 10) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–69 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Capture efficiency did not depend on sample multiplexing.
Outcomecapture efficiency e1 Comparatorwhether the samples were multiplexed e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “independent of whether the samples were multiplexed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1007 e1 “The capture efficiency was similar between the two accessions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–951 e2 “Gossypium hirsutum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–499 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation author interpretation review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Crops vary considerably in leaf-level efficiency of CO2 and light capture .
Outcomeefficiency of CO{sub 2} and light capture e0 Verbatim
e0 “There is considerable variation between crops in their efficiency of CO{sub 2} and light capture at the leaf level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–368 Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Centranthus ruber had the highest overall particulate matter capture efficiency .
OutcomePM capture efficiency e0 Not reported Setting
Verbatim
e0 “C. ruber exhibited the highest overall PM capture efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1220 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
More intensive rotations did not improve precipitation capture efficiency .
Treatmentmore intensive rotations e0 Outcomeefficiency of precipitation capture e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The efficiency of precipitation capture was not greater with more intensive rotations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–835 t0 “continuous grain sorghum (SS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–497 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.