View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: pea ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
All cultivars germinated at all NaCl levels with no significant decrease in germination.
Directionwithout a significant decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “3 pea cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–232 e2 “All cultivars were able to germinate at all NaCl levels without a significant decrease in germination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1179 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 50mM NaCl, pea germination and growth traits showed no significant decrease .
TreatmentNaCl 50mM NaCl e0 Outcomegermination and growth traits e0 Directionwithout a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “seeds of pea were able to germinate at low salinity levels (NaCl 50mM NaCl) without a significant decrease in germination and growth traits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–617 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll a and b did not decrease significantly in Santi, BC11, BC91, BC14 and BARI-1.
MaterialSanti, BC11, BC91, BC14 and BARI-1 e0 Treatmentiron deficiency t0 Outcomechlorophyll a and b concentrations e0 Directionnot significantly decreased e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “chlorophyll a and b concentrations were not significantly decrease d in Santi, BC11, BC91, BC14 and BARI-1. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–515 t0 “pea genotypes tolerant to iron deficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–63 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Iron deficiency significantly reduced chlorophyll a and b in Parafield, BC17 and IPSA-2. Intervention effect Fe deficiency significantly reduced leaf number, shoot height and shoot weight in Parafield, BC17, BD14 and IPSA-2. Intervention effect Santi, BC11, BC91 and BARI-1 showed no prominent growth decrease under Fe deficiency. Intervention effect Fe deficiency significantly reduced root length and biomass in Parafield, BC17 and IPSA-2. Intervention effect Root length and biomass were unchanged under Fe shortage in Santi, BC11, BC91, BC14 and BARI-1. Observation Santi, BC11, BC91 and BARI-1 were classified as Fe deficiency tolerant. Observation BC14 was classified as intermediate in Fe deficiency tolerance. Observation Parafield, BC17 and IPSA2 were classified as Fe deficiency sensitive. Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Mineral fertilizers with plant protection products in moldboard and combined tillage did not significantly affect soil microflora; a slight decrease of 17.0 % was within experimental error.
Treatmentmineral fertilizers in combination with plant protection products e1 Outcomeamount of soil microflora e1 Directiondid not have a significant effect e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t1 “UNDER PEA SOWING ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–102 e1 “The use of mineral fertilizers in combination with plant protection products in moldboard and combined tillage did not have a significant effect on the amount of soil microflora ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1233 e2 “a slight decrease to 17.0 % within the experimental error was noted ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1302 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in pea.
Treatmentsupplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation e0 Directionnot significantly decreased e0 Comparatorcontrol plants that received only solar UV-B radiation e0 Verbatim
e0 “The dry weights of all 4 species and pea and wheat plant height were not significantly decrease d by a supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation from cellulose acetate filtered FS-40 sunlamps for 6 hours each day, relative to control plants that received only solar UV-B radiation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1138 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Auxins had no significant effect on proton transport V(max).
Directionno significant effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “with no significant effect on the V(max) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–789 e1 “Auxins decrease the K(m) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–722 e2 “Pea root microsomal vesicles ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Antimycin A had no significant effect on enzyme light activation in isolated chloroplasts.
Organ / stageisolated chloroplasts e0 Outcomelight activation of these 4 enzymes e0 Directionno significant effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Antimycin A or oligomycin or SHAM had no significant effect on light activation of these 4 enzymes in isolated chloroplasts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1041 t0 “of pea (Pisum sativum ) in the absence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–136 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Oligomycin had no significant effect on enzyme light activation in isolated chloroplasts.
Organ / stageisolated chloroplasts e0 Outcomelight activation of these 4 enzymes e0 Directionno significant effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Antimycin A or oligomycin or SHAM had no significant effect on light activation of these 4 enzymes in isolated chloroplasts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1041 t0 “of pea (Pisum sativum ) in the absence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–136 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
SHAM had no significant effect on enzyme light activation in isolated chloroplasts.
Organ / stageisolated chloroplasts e0 Outcomelight activation of these 4 enzymes e0 Directionno significant effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Antimycin A or oligomycin or SHAM had no significant effect on light activation of these 4 enzymes in isolated chloroplasts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1041 t0 “of pea (Pisum sativum ) in the absence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–136 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The 0.3 and 0.4 mM nitrite effects were slight and nonsignificant after 18 hours.
Treatment0.3 and 0.4 mM NO2- e2 Qualifierafter 18 h exposure e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “the effect of these concentrations was only slight and not significant after 18 h exposure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–469 t0 “The effect of nitrite on glutamine synthetase level in isolatedPisutn sativutn L. roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87 e1 “Exposure of isolated pea roots to 0.5 and 2.0 mM nitrite resulted in a temporary decrease in glutamine synthetase (GS) level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 e2 “At this time, GS level also significantly decrease d by 0.3 and 0.4 mM NO2- ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–373 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.