View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in biomass , gs and Tr under salt-alkali stress was much greater in tr ue leaves than in cotyledons.
true leaves e1 decrease in biomass, gs and Tr e1 Verbatim
e0 “Ricinus communis seedlings were tr eated with varying (40, 80 and 120 mM) salinity (NaCl) and alkalinity (NaHCO3) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–632 e1 “the decrease in biomass , gs and Tr of tr ue leaves were much greater than that of cotyledons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–983 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
High nitrogen supply offset the decrease in Tr under elevated CO2.
High N supplies e0 offset the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “High N supplies could further improve the Pn and offset the decrease of Gs and Tr by elevated [CO2]. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–817 t0 “cucumber plants ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 155–170 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
High nitrogen supply offset the decrease in Gs under elevated CO2.
High N supplies e0 offset the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “High N supplies could further improve the Pn and offset the decrease of Gs and Tr by elevated [CO2]. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–817 t0 “cucumber plants ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 155–170 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Elevated CO2 changed tr anspiration rate ( Tr ) by 22.9–31.9%.
elevated [CO2] e0 transpiration rate (Tr) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “An in crease in net photosynthetic rate (Pn) by more than 60%, a decrease in stomatal conductance ( Gs ) by 21.2–27.7%, and a decrease in tr anspiration rate ( Tr ) by 22.9–31.9% under elevated [CO2] were also observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–716 t0 “cucumber plants ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 155–170 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Elevated CO2 changed stomatal conductance ( Gs ) by 21.2–27.7%.
elevated [CO2] e0 stomatal conductance (Gs) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “An in crease in net photosynthetic rate (Pn) by more than 60%, a decrease in stomatal conductance ( Gs ) by 21.2–27.7%, and a decrease in tr anspiration rate ( Tr ) by 22.9–31.9% under elevated [CO2] were also observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–716 t0 “cucumber plants ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 155–170 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing shading range decrease d net photosynthesis rate, tr anspiration rate and stomatal conductance of wheat.
increase in the shading range e3 net photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (gs) e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “With the in crease in the shading range, the net photosynthesis rate (Pn), tr anspiration rate ( Tr ), stomatal conductance ( gs ), and non-photochemical quentum coefficient (NPQ) decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–1009 e1 “compared with S0, wheat leaf area in dex (LAI), chlorophyll a, b and a + b content under S1 in crease by 14.9–57.4%, 2.9–24.5%, 16.5–28.9%, 7.8–25.5%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–762 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect Under S1 shading, wheat leaf area index increased by 14.9–57.4% compared with normal light. Intervention effect Under S1 shading, wheat chlorophyll a content increased by 2.9–24.5% compared with normal light. Intervention effect Under S1 shading, wheat chlorophyll b content increased by 16.5–28.9% compared with normal light. Intervention effect Under S1 shading, wheat chlorophyll a + b content increased by 7.8–25.5% compared with normal light. Intervention effect Increasing shading range decreased total dry matter accumulation, reproductive dry matter accumulation and yield of wheat. Intervention effect Increasing shading range decreased non-photochemical quenching coefficient of wheat. Intervention effect Increasing shading range increased the actual photochemical efficiency and photochemical quenching coefficient of wheat. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat leaf area index by 4.1–366.9% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat chlorophyll content by 5.7–56.3% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat net photosynthesis rate by 3.0–131.7% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat actual photochemical efficiency by 6.7–87.5% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat photochemical quenching coefficient by 3.7–96.9% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat total dry matter accumulation by 7.1–340.8% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat dry matter accumulation of reproductive organs by 0.3–323.0% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat yield by 1.5–231.2% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Recommendation Under moderate or excessive shading, the regulating effect of nitrogen application on wheat is reduced and nitrogen application should be moderately reduced. Recommendation Under light shade in the early stage, proper nitrogen application can regulate wheat photosynthetic capacity and dry matter transfer and compensate for the negative effect of insufficient light on wheat yield. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
High nitrogen supply improve in Pn under elevated CO2.
High N supplies e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “High N supplies could further improve the Pn and offset the decrease of Gs and Tr by elevated [CO2]. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–817 t0 “cucumber plants ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 155–170 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Elevated CO2 changed net photosynthetic rate (Pn) by more than 60%.
elevated [CO2] e0 net photosynthetic rate (Pn) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “An in crease in net photosynthetic rate (Pn) by more than 60%, a decrease in stomatal conductance ( Gs ) by 21.2–27.7%, and a decrease in tr anspiration rate ( Tr ) by 22.9–31.9% under elevated [CO2] were also observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–716 t0 “cucumber plants ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 155–170 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Minimal fluorescence (F0) gradually decrease d with in creasing water stress in kernel-apricot seedlings.
seedling stage e0 gradual decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “To in vestigate the effects of different moisture on photosynthesis and biomass accumulation in kernel-apricot at seedling stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 e1 “The results showed that the Pn, Tr , Ci and Gs gradually decrease d with the water stress (WS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–425 e3 “in stead of the gradual in crease of qN, the in crease was reduced at the beginning at first and then gradual decrease of F0 was found ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–836 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing shading range decrease d non-photochemical quenching coefficient of wheat.
increase in the shading range e3 non-photochemical quentum coefficient (NPQ) e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “With the in crease in the shading range, the net photosynthesis rate (Pn), tr anspiration rate ( Tr ), stomatal conductance ( gs ), and non-photochemical quentum coefficient (NPQ) decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–1009 e1 “compared with S0, wheat leaf area in dex (LAI), chlorophyll a, b and a + b content under S1 in crease by 14.9–57.4%, 2.9–24.5%, 16.5–28.9%, 7.8–25.5%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–762 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect Under S1 shading, wheat leaf area index increased by 14.9–57.4% compared with normal light. Intervention effect Under S1 shading, wheat chlorophyll a content increased by 2.9–24.5% compared with normal light. Intervention effect Under S1 shading, wheat chlorophyll b content increased by 16.5–28.9% compared with normal light. Intervention effect Under S1 shading, wheat chlorophyll a + b content increased by 7.8–25.5% compared with normal light. Intervention effect Increasing shading range decreased total dry matter accumulation, reproductive dry matter accumulation and yield of wheat. Intervention effect Increasing shading range decreased net photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance of wheat. Intervention effect Increasing shading range increased the actual photochemical efficiency and photochemical quenching coefficient of wheat. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat leaf area index by 4.1–366.9% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat chlorophyll content by 5.7–56.3% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat net photosynthesis rate by 3.0–131.7% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat actual photochemical efficiency by 6.7–87.5% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat photochemical quenching coefficient by 3.7–96.9% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat total dry matter accumulation by 7.1–340.8% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat dry matter accumulation of reproductive organs by 0.3–323.0% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Intervention effect Under S0 and S1, N2 treatment increased wheat yield by 1.5–231.2% compared with other nitrogen treatments. Recommendation Under moderate or excessive shading, the regulating effect of nitrogen application on wheat is reduced and nitrogen application should be moderately reduced. Recommendation Under light shade in the early stage, proper nitrogen application can regulate wheat photosynthetic capacity and dry matter transfer and compensate for the negative effect of insufficient light on wheat yield. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Ricinus communis
Cucumis sativus
Triticum aestivum