View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: cotton ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease cottonseed seed vitality.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WD significantly in creased the relative protein content of cottonseed but decrease d the relative oil content , leading to a decrease in seed vitality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1908 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d cottonseed relative oil content .
Outcomerelative oil content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WD significantly in creased the relative protein content of cottonseed but decrease d the relative oil content , leading to a decrease in seed vitality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1908 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit in creased cottonseed relative protein content of cottonseed.
Outcomerelative protein content of cottonseed e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WD significantly in creased the relative protein content of cottonseed but decrease d the relative oil content , leading to a decrease in seed vitality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1908 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Skipping irrigation at flowering decrease d leaf relative water content , SPAD values and net photosynthetic rate in cotton.
TreatmentSkipping irrigation for up to 21 days at flowering e1 Outcomeleaf relative water content, SPAD values, net photosynthetic rate e1 ComparatorNormal irrigated crop e2 Verbatim
e1 “Skipping irrigation for up to 21 days at flowering caused a significant decrease in leaf relative water content , SPAD values, net photosynthetic rate and seed cotton yield in both the genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1420 e2 “Seed cotton yield showed an overall decline of 24.7% in skip over Normal irrigated crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1509 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under salinity stress, leaf relative water content decrease d by 26% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones.
Materialsusceptible cotton genotypes e1 Outcomeleaf relative water content e1 Comparatortolerant ones e1 Verbatim
e1 “Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–493 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Under salinity stress, shoot length decreased by 50.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, root length decreased by 41.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, shoot weight decreased by 50% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, root weight decreased by 41% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, chlorophyll content decreased by 56% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, Fv/Fm decreased by 12.9% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Proline, glycine and betaine increased in cotton in response to salinity. Intervention effect Total sugars increased in cotton in response to salinity. Intervention effect The increase in osmolytes was even greater with ABA priming under salinity in susceptible seedling leaves. Intervention effect ABA treatment had a positive effect on physiological and growth parameters of cotton. Intervention effect ABA seed pre-treatment ameliorated the negative impact of salinity stress in susceptible cotton seedlings. Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Potassium- in duced in creases in relative water content and membrane stability were in terpreted as protective against salt stress.
Outcomeprotective mechanisms against NaCl stress e0 Qualifierrelative water content and membrane stability index e0 Verbatim
e0 “In conclusion, K- in duced decrease in Na + , in crease in Ca 2+ , K + , K + : Na + ratio, relative water content and membrane stability in dex provide protective mechanisms against NaCl stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1861–2051 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed cotton yield declined by 24.7% under skipped irrigation relative to normal irrigation.
TreatmentSkipping irrigation for up to 21 days at flowering e1 OutcomeSeed cotton yield e2 ComparatorNormal irrigated crop e2 Verbatim
e1 “Skipping irrigation for up to 21 days at flowering caused a significant decrease in leaf relative water content , SPAD values, net photosynthetic rate and seed cotton yield in both the genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1420 e2 “Seed cotton yield showed an overall decline of 24.7% in skip over Normal irrigated crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1509 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under salinity stress, chlorophyll content decrease d by 56% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones.
Materialsusceptible cotton genotypes e1 Outcomechlorophyll content e1 Comparatortolerant ones e1 Verbatim
e1 “Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–493 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Under salinity stress, shoot length decreased by 50.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, root length decreased by 41.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, shoot weight decreased by 50% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, root weight decreased by 41% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, leaf relative water content decreased by 26% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, Fv/Fm decreased by 12.9% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Proline, glycine and betaine increased in cotton in response to salinity. Intervention effect Total sugars increased in cotton in response to salinity. Intervention effect The increase in osmolytes was even greater with ABA priming under salinity in susceptible seedling leaves. Intervention effect ABA treatment had a positive effect on physiological and growth parameters of cotton. Intervention effect ABA seed pre-treatment ameliorated the negative impact of salinity stress in susceptible cotton seedlings. Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Potassium- in duced ion balance changes were in terpreted as protective mechanisms against salt stress.
Outcomeprotective mechanisms against NaCl stress e0 Qualifierdecrease in Na + , increase in Ca 2+ , K + , K + : Na + ratio e0 Verbatim
e0 “In conclusion, K- in duced decrease in Na + , in crease in Ca 2+ , K + , K + : Na + ratio, relative water content and membrane stability in dex provide protective mechanisms against NaCl stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1861–2051 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under salinity stress, shoot weight decrease d by 50% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones.
Materialsusceptible cotton genotypes e1 Comparatortolerant ones e1 Verbatim
e1 “Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–493 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Under salinity stress, shoot length decreased by 50.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, root length decreased by 41.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, root weight decreased by 41% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, leaf relative water content decreased by 26% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, chlorophyll content decreased by 56% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, Fv/Fm decreased by 12.9% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Proline, glycine and betaine increased in cotton in response to salinity. Intervention effect Total sugars increased in cotton in response to salinity. Intervention effect The increase in osmolytes was even greater with ABA priming under salinity in susceptible seedling leaves. Intervention effect ABA treatment had a positive effect on physiological and growth parameters of cotton. Intervention effect ABA seed pre-treatment ameliorated the negative impact of salinity stress in susceptible cotton seedlings. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.