View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Damage position produced low standard errors and generally nonsignificant F ratios.
damage position e0 Verbatim
e0 “A comparison of damage position on the leaf specimen stage yielded low standard errors and generally nonsignificant F ratios. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–682 e1 “undamaged soybean leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–435 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Time since calibration had no significant effect on load prediction errors .
load prediction errors e0 nosignificant effect e0 time elapsed since last system calibration e0 Not reported Setting
Verbatim
e0 “the amount of time elapsed since last system calibration had nosignificant effect on load prediction errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1020 t0 “Cotton Yield Mapping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cotton moisture content had no significant effect on load prediction errors .
load prediction errors e0 nosignificant effect e0 Verbatim
e0 “Average cotton flow rate, cottonmoisture content, and the amount of time elapsed since last system calibration had nosignificant effect on load prediction errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1020 t0 “Cotton Yield Mapping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Average cotton flow rate had no significant effect on load prediction errors .
load prediction errors e0 nosignificant effect e0 Average cotton flow rate e0 Not reported Setting
Verbatim
e0 “Average cotton flow rate, cottonmoisture content, and the amount of time elapsed since last system calibration had nosignificant effect on load prediction errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1020 t0 “Cotton Yield Mapping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Most birch clones had similar properties, within the limits of statistical errors .
similar properties e6 within the limits of statistical errors e6 Verbatim
e1 “birch trees grown on a provenance experiment plot established as a seed orchard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–141 e6 “Most of clones had similar properties within the limits of statistical errors ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–886 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
Sensor errors in pasture measurement did not have a significant financial cost to farmers when recommended techniques were followed.
Sensor errors for pasture measurement e2 if recommended measurement techniques are closely followed e2 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e2 “Sensor errors for pasture measurement were shown not to have a significant financial cost to farmers if recommended measurement techniques are closely followed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1112 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The main errors did not significantly affect overall model performance.
overall performance e0 did not significantly affect e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “the main errors did not significantly affect the overall performance of the two-layer model. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1580 t0 “Olive Orchard ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–117 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Moisture correction equations predicted quality changes in independent samples with average errors that were not significant.
10 independent samples e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–19 e0 “The moisture correction equations for Stenvert hardness, WAI, and kernel density were used to predict moisture-related quality changes in 10 independent samples of unknown genotype and storage history. The average errors of the equations relative to actual data were not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1206 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Localization errors were below 7.5 mm across 300 to 1600 mm measuring distance.
Fruit and Vegetable t0 Localization errors e0 between 300 and 1600 mm e0 Verbatim
e0 “Localization errors had no significant difference and they were less than 7.5 mm when the measuring distance was between 300 and 1600 mm under varying illumination and partially occluded conditions. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1865 t0 “Fruit and Vegetable ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Loading errors with carbofuran were insignificant relative to pest infestation variation.
errors in loading e0 variability in pest infestation e0 Verbatim
e0 “The performance of uniform doses of carbofuran (on sand) and chlorfenvinphos (on Spanish Silical) against cabbage root fly on radish in 15 m plots showed that errors in loading were insignificant compared with the variability in pest infestation on the field plots. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1270 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Glycine maxe1
Gossypium hirsutum
Olea europaea
Zea mays
Raphanus sativus
Delia radicum