View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower stocking rate produced higher NDF in offered herbage .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “herbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 e0 “higher NDF values were detected ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–683 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Genotypic-regression heritability of herbage NDF was 80%.
Verbatim
e0 “tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 e1 “Heritabilities from herbage estimated by genotypic regressions were higher, ranging from 26% for IVDMD in the summer to 80% for NDF ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1513 Other claims from this paper (13) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Herbage NDF was largely unaffected by PLH injury at harvest.
TreatmentPLH‐induced injury e0 OutcomeTotal herbage NDF concentration e0 Directionlargely unaffected e0 Verbatim
e0 “Total herbage NDF concentration was largely unaffected at harvest by levels of PLH‐induced injury ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1082 t0 “Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–25 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In Kentucky bluegrass, leaf concentration was negatively correlated with herbage NDF and ADL concentration.
Outcomeherbage NDF and ADL concentration e3 Directionnegatively correlated e3 Verbatim
t0 “Kentucky bluegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–58 e3 “Leaf concentration was negatively correlated with herbage NDF and ADL concentration, but was not correlated with herbage IVDDM and CP concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1383 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Napier orchardgrass herbage had 3% more NDF than Orion.
OutcomeNDF concentration e0 Verbatim
e0 “In orchardgrass, NDF concentration was 3% greater and CW‐lignin concentration was 24% greater in Napier than in Orion herbage . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1286 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
MSW accounted for 97% of the variation in NDF and IVDDM of alfalfa stems and herbage .
OutcomeNDF and IVDDM concentrations e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e1 “MSW accounted for 97% of the variation in NDF and IVDDM concentrations of alfalfa stems and herbage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1295 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Chicory reseeding reduced herbage NDF concentration relative to RGC.
Outcomeherbage NDF concentrations e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to RGC, the C, T, CG and TG treatments had lower herbage NDF concentrations (P < 0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1161 t0 “chicory ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Tyfon reseeding reduced herbage NDF concentration relative to RGC.
Outcomeherbage NDF concentrations e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to RGC, the C, T, CG and TG treatments had lower herbage NDF concentrations (P < 0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1161 t0 “tyfon ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Herbage NDF was 8% greater in HL than LL Group 1 lines.
Outcomeherbage NDF concentration e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “Likewise, herbage NDF concentration was 8% greater in HL than in LL lines of Group 1 and 4% greater in Group 2. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1009 t0 “Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–49 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Herbage NDF was 4% greater in HL than LL Group 2 lines.
Outcomeherbage NDF concentration e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “Likewise, herbage NDF concentration was 8% greater in HL than in LL lines of Group 1 and 4% greater in Group 2. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1009 t0 “Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–49 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.