Refine

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AKBR-20-05 had the lowest leaf area at harvest.

Material
AKBR-20-05e0
Organ / stage
harveste0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
loweste0

Verbatim

e0

“the genotype AKBR-20-05 recorded lowest leaf area at harvest among the genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–780
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–39

Title

Morpho-physiological studies in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.)

Vaishnavi G Hanwate; PP Gawande; DS Phad; et al. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research 2025. doi:10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i7si.4977

Other claims from this paper (13)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA 3 gave maximum leaf area at harvest of 1027 cm 2.

Outcome
leaf area at harveste0
Value
1027 cm 2e0

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area at harvest (1027 cm 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–506
t0

“Cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71

Title

Effect of Various PGR and Micronutrients on Growth and Yield of Cabbage in Eastern Region of Uttar Pradesh, India

Anuj Patel; Pradumn Kumar Mourya; Jatin Kumar Singh; et al. Ecology Environment and Conservation 2024. doi:10.53550/eec.2024.v30i04s.057

Other claims from this paper (8)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest retaining leaf area at lespedeza harvest for regrowth.

Taxon
annual lespedezae0e1e3
Outcome
leaving residual leaf area at harveste0e1e3
Qualifier
may be important for regrowthe0e1e3

Verbatim

e0

“leaving residual leaf area at harvest may be important for regrowth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1584
e1

“leaving residual leaf area at harvest may be important for regrowth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1584
e3

“As annual lespedeza maintains relatively small amounts of root TNC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1514

Title

Total Nonstructural Carbohydrate Accumulation in Roots of Annual Lespedeza

David K. Davis; Robert L. McGraw; Paul R. Beuselinck; et al. Agronomy Journal 1995. doi:10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700010016x

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index at harvest was 9.43.

Taxon
Super Napiert0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Value
9.43e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf area index noticed at the time of harvest was 9.43.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1024
t0

“Super Napier”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72

Title

A Study on Biometric Parameters and Chemical Composition of Super Napier Green Fodder

N JYOTHI; RAVINDRA REDDY; D SURESH BABU; et al. Indian Journal of Animal Production and Management 2024. doi:10.48165/ijapm.2023.37.4.14

Other claims from this paper (18)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel enhanced leaf area and leaf area index at harvest.

Taxon
Bt. Cottont0
Treatment
cycocel (40 ppm) at 75 and 90 DASe0
Outcome
leaf area per plant and leaf area index per plante0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cycocel (40 ppm) at 75 and 90 DAS enhanced leaf area per plant and leaf area index per plant at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1145
t0

“Bt. Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–108

Title

Effect of spacing and growth regulation levels on leaf area, branches and dry matter per plant of Bt. Cotton

K. P. Ghetiya; P. K. Chovatia; V. N. Raiyani; et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES 2022. doi:10.15740/has/ijas/18-ciabassd/54-59

Other claims from this paper (6)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area at harvest decreased as defoliation increased.

Treatment
level of defoliatione0
Outcome
Leaf area at harveste0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area at harvest, head weight, and proportion of harvested heads with a diameter of at least 10 cm decreased as the level of defoliation increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–431
t0

“Cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40

Title

Response of Two Cultivars of Cauliflower to Simulated Insect Defoliation

Jeff G. Stewart; Kenneth B. McRae; Mark K. Sears Journal of Economic Entomology 1990. doi:10.1093/jee/83.4.1499

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant varieties had minimal 6.8% leaf area reduction at harvest.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
reduction in leaf areae0
Direction
minimale0
Value
6.8%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in leaf area at the harvest stage was also minimal (6.8%) in the tolerant varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–568
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31

Title

Productivity of Rainfed Sorghum — A Physiological Analysis

D. Durga Devi; K. M. Sundaram; N. Natarajaratnam Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 1987. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.1987.tb00115.x

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index was maintained at 6.61 in the harvest period.

Taxon
chili pepperCapsicumt0
Outcome
leaf area indexe2
Value
6.61e2
Qualifier
in harvest periode2

Verbatim

t0

“Growth and Yield of Chili Peppers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–65
e2

“in harvest period leaf area index was still maintained at 6.61”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–640

Title

Effect of Plantation Density on Growth and Yield of Chili Peppers

Wang Xu-qian He'nan nongye kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Despite greater stress, Navajo trees had greater leaf area at harvest.

Material
Navajo selectione0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Despite greater stress, the Navajo selection had greater leaf area and dry weight at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1339

Title

Drought Tolerance of Navajo and Lovell Peach Trees: Precision Water Stress Using Automated Weighing Lysimeters

Will Wheeler; Reagan Wytsalucy; Brent Black; et al. HortScience 2019. doi:10.21273/hortsci13806-18

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index at harvest was highest under 300 mm irrigation.

Taxon
Cluster BeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
300 mm irrigation levele0
Outcome
leaf area index at harveste0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.24e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“However, leaf area index at harvest (1.24) was highest at 300 mm irrigation level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1734–1816
t0

“Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–53

Title

Performance of Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) under Varying Levels of Irrigation and Nitrogen

Rakesh Kumar; N.K. Pareek; V.S. Rathore; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2022. doi:10.18805/lr-4897

Other claims from this paper (19)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.