Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield had a positive linear response in 2013 on those soils.

Taxon: CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: positive linear responsee0

Verbatim

e0
“yield had a positive linear response in 2013”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1207

t0
“Corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43

Title

Field‐Scale Studies Show Site‐Specific Corn Population and Yield Responses to Seeding Depths

William J. Cox; Jerome H. Cherney Agronomy Journal 2015. doi:10.2134/agronj15.0308

Other claims from this paper (10)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded mixtures showed a linear soybean yield response.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: mixturese0
Outcome: linear responsee0
Setting: bandede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Regarding the "mixtures", a linear response was observed when they were banded”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1239

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7

Title

Soybean yield in response to application of phosphate rock associated with triple superphosphate

Adilson de Oliveira Júnior; Luís Ignácio Prochnow; Dirceu Klepker Scientia Agricola 2011. doi:10.1590/s0103-90162011000300016

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield response was nearly linear in years two through four and linear in year five.

Taxon: AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome: Yield response to irrigatione0
Qualifier: during the second through fourth years and linear during the fifth year with droughte0

Verbatim

e0
“Yield response to irrigation was nearly linear during the second through fourth years and linear during the fifth year with drought”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1848

t0
“Alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7

Title

Alfalfa Response to Irrigation from Limited Water Supplies

Norman L. Klocke; Randall S. Currie; Johnathon D. Holman Transactions of the ASABE 2013. doi:10.13031/trans.56.10166

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation Mean dry matter yield declined from first to final year.
Intervention effect Annual yield declined from 1.53 under irrigation to 0.43 kg m-2 rainfed.
Intervention effect Annual yields were equal under distributed and withheld irrigation.
Association Water use efficiency declined as irrigation decreased and over time.
Association Plant stand declined as irrigation decreased and over time.
Association Regression of yield on evapotranspiration gave R2 of 0.90.
Observation Middle-year yield–irrigation regressions overlapped an earlier study at the same location.
Association Previous season water availability influenced starting soil water.
Observation Plant-available water was depleted to at least 2.4 m in the first season.
Observation Plant-available water was partially restored in only one dormant season.
Observation Rainfed soil water content fell to 0.1 in all years.

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-linear yield response functions correspond with cotton yield-soil salinity in the Tarim Basin better than linear response functions.

Taxon: cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome: cotton yield-soil salinitye1
Direction: bettere1
Comparator: the linear response functionse1
Setting: Tarim Basint0

Verbatim

t0
“Salt Tolerance Functions of Cotton in Tarim Basin”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–74

e1
“The non-linear functions and their thresholds of salt tolerance can correspond with the cotton yield-soil salinity in Tarim Basin better than the linear response functions by analyzing their differences”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–746

Title

Experimental Research on Salt Tolerance Functions of Cotton in Tarim Basin

Shan Wen-guang China Rural Water and Hydropower 2010

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linear yield response to environment mean yield was similar across wheat entries.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome: linear response to environment mean yielde0
Direction: similare0

Verbatim

e0
“the linear response to environment mean yield was similar for all wheat entries”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1100

Title

The interaction of wheat genotypes with a specific factor of the environment

H. S. Easton; R. J. Clements The Journal of Agricultural Science 1973. doi:10.1017/s002185960005704x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Eight wheat entries showed significant departure from linear response to environment mean yield.
Method / resource Several analyses identified the aberrant wheat entries as unstable.
Method / resource Departure from linearity was judged inadequate for measuring wheat yield instability.
Association A wheat entry’s yield stability ranking varied with the average response of the comparison group.
Intervention effect Applied nitrogen generally increased wheat grains per ear.
Intervention effect Applied nitrogen generally decreased wheat grain weight.
Association Grain number per ear varied unpredictably with nitrogen treatment and differed significantly among wheat entries.
Association Grain weight varied unpredictably with nitrogen treatment and differed significantly among wheat entries.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield response of machine-harvested southernpeas to row spacing was primarily linear.

Taxon: southernpease0
Outcome: yield responsee3
Qualifier: primarily lineare3

Verbatim

e0
“Yield of southernpeas machine-harvested at the green-mature stage”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–65

e3
“The yield response was primarily linear”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–595

Title

ROW SPACING AFFECTS YIELD OF MACHINE-HARVESTED GREEN-MATURE SOUTHERNPEAS

Blair Buckley; Katharine Pee HortScience 1995. doi:10.21273/hortsci.30.3.438e

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Marketable yield of machine-harvested southernpeas was greater at 53-cm row spacing than at wider row spacings.
Intervention effect Marketable yield from double-drilled 107-cm rows did not differ significantly from single-drilled 107-cm rows.
Intervention effect Marketable yield from double-drilled 107-cm rows was less than from 53-cm rows.
Observation In 1993 the percentage of pods mature at harvest showed a linear response.
Association The percentage of mature pods was greatest at 53-cm row spacing.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phalaris yield response to superphosphate was mainly linear.

Taxon: phalarisPhalarise0
Treatment: superphosphatee0
Outcome: responsee0
Direction: lineare0

Verbatim

e0
“The response to superphosphate of phalaris was mainly linear”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–448

Title

Grass-white clover relationships during pasture development. 2. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer with superphosphate

EC Wolfe; A Lazenby Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1973. doi:10.1071/ea9730575

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Superphosphate increased annual phalaris yield each year.
Intervention effect Superphosphate increased annual clover yield each year.
Intervention effect Superphosphate increased annual total pasture yield each year.
Intervention effect In the final year, clover yield at SP188 exceeded SP375.
Intervention effect Nitrogen increased phalaris annual dry matter yield only with superphosphate.
Intervention effect Nitrogen increased total pasture annual dry matter yield only with superphosphate.
Intervention effect Nitrogen suppressed clover growth only in the final year.
Intervention effect Nitrogen did not increase total pasture yield in the final year.
Observation Without nitrogen, SP375 pasture shifted from clover dominance in 1967–68 to grass dominance in 1970.
Observation At SP188, pasture remained clover dominant after establishment.
Intervention effect Nitrogen reduced clover dominance at the higher superphosphate rate.
Intervention effect Nitrogen prevented clover dominance at SP188.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield loss response was linear during vegetative growth.

Taxon: Navy Beant0
Organ / stage: vegetative growthe0
Treatment: defoliatione0
Outcome: yield loss responsee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0
“Navy Bean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32

e0
“The yield loss response was linear for defoliation imposed during vegetative growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1767

Title

Yield Loss Response of Navy Bean to Partial or Total Defoliation

A. W. Schaafsma; G. R. Ablett jpa 1994. doi:10.2134/jpa1994.0202

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Complete defoliation during vegetative or flowering stages delayed navy bean maturity up to 30 days.
Intervention effect Lower defoliation levels generally did not affect maturity.
Intervention effect At mid-pod fill, defoliation of at least 66% shortened time to maturity by up to one week.
Intervention effect Seed weights responded variably to vegetative-stage defoliation.
Intervention effect Higher defoliation generally produced smaller seeds, especially at pod fill.
Intervention effect Vegetative-stage yield loss was significant only with at least 83% defoliation.
Intervention effect Defoliation of at least 33% at flowering caused yield loss.
Intervention effect Defoliation of at least 33% at pod fill caused yield loss.
Association Yield loss response was quadratic at flowering and pod fill.
Intervention effect Defoliation during reproductive growth caused greater yield loss than during vegetative growth.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most cultivars showed a linear yield response across environments.

Taxon: cultivarse0
Outcome: yielde0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0
“A majority of the cultivars exhibited linear response for yield but not for fruit characteristics.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–361

Title

Evaluation of Muskmelon Cultivar Performance by Joint Regression Analysis1

Timothy J Ng; C. A. McClurg; F. F. Angell; et al. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1980. doi:10.21273/jashs.105.2.220

Other claims from this paper (6)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The response of forage yield of turnip to nitrogen was linear.

Taxon: turnipBrassica rapa subsp. rapae5
Treatment: nitrogene5
Outcome: forage yielde5
Qualifier: lineare5

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e5
“Response of nitrogen to forage yield of turnip was linear”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–851

Title

Effect of sowing date and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and nitrogen uptake of forage turnip (Brassica rapa)

VINOD UKAI; NISHA KANT CHOPRA; N.K. CHOPRA; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v61i2.4360

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Sowing on 26 September gave significantly higher plant height than sowing on 26 October and 11 November.
Intervention effect Sowing on 26 September gave higher number of leaves, forage yield and nitrogen uptake than later sowing.
Mechanism Higher plant height and forage yield reflect a higher accumulation of growing degree-days.
Intervention effect Accumulation of growing degree-days gradually reduced with delay in sowing from 26 September to 11 November.
Intervention effect Forage yield was significantly improved by 160 kg N/ha compared with lower nitrogen levels.
Observation Net returns were highest with sowing on 26 September (62,411/ha).
Observation Net returns were highest with 160 kg N/ha (56,534/ha).
Observation The benefit to cost ratio was highest with 26 September sowing (2.57).
Observation The benefit to cost ratio was highest with 160 kg N/ha (2.34).

“linear yield response”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics