View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Quantitative PCR confirmed differences in pathogen growth among RN, SL, and S phenotypes.
OutcomeP. infestans growth differencee0 ComparatorRN, SL, and S phenotypes e0 Verbatim
e0 “Quantitative PCR confirmed P. infestans growth difference in RN, SL, and S phenotypes. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1109 e1 “In 164 S. dulcamara genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–728 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
S. sampsonii culture filtrate reduced pathogen mycelial growth by 84.50%.
Interactorpathogen e0 pathogen Outcomemycelial growth pathogen e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “S. sampsonii was more efficient as a bioagent in reducing mycelial growth pathogen by 84.50%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1466 t0 “green bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 159–169 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Antimicrobial components of S. violaceusniger inhibited pathogen growth .
Treatmentantimicrobial components of S. violaceusniger e0 Outcomegrowth activities of the pathogen e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The antimicrobial components of S. violaceusniger were also found to be inhibited the growth activities of the pathogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1301 t0 “ground nut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–32 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
S. violaceusniger reduced pathogen mycelial growth .
TreatmentS. violaceusniger e0 InteractorSclerotiumrolfsii t0 pathogen Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The antagonistic activities of S. violaceusniger were found to be effective in reducing the mycelial growth , sclerotial formation, and sclerotial germination. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–908 t0 “Streptomyces is a Potential biocontrol agent for the management of Groundnut stem rot Pathogen Sclerotiumrolfsii ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–112 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Volatile metabolites of S. cerevisiae inhibited the growth of S. sclerotiorum by 44.24%.
Treatmentvolatile metabolites assay e0 Interactorpathogen e0 pathogen Outcomepathogen's growth e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Common Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 e0 “For volatile metabolites assay, both C. albidus and S. cerevisiae effectively inhibited the pathogen 's growth , with rates of 53.38% and 44.24%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1001 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
LAR-06 plus S-2 was among the most potent combinations for inhibiting pathogen radial growth .
Interactortest pathogen e0 pathogen Outcomeradial growth of the test pathogen e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “LAR-06 + S-2 and LAR-06+ S-18 were found to be the most potent ones in inhibiting the radial growth of the test pathogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1236 t0 “Pigeonpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
LAR-06 plus S-18 was among the most potent combinations for inhibiting pathogen radial growth .
Interactortest pathogen e0 pathogen Outcomeradial growth of the test pathogen e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “LAR-06 + S-2 and LAR-06+ S-18 were found to be the most potent ones in inhibiting the radial growth of the test pathogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1236 t0 “Pigeonpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Strain S 024 was the best at inhibiting the pathogen , with a 78.6% decrease in mycelial growth .
Interactorpathogen e1 pathogen Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “the strain S 024 is the best one on inhibiting pathogen with the78.6%mycelia growth decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–296 t0 “Wheat Sharp eye-spot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Resistance of S. lycopersicoides to B. cinerea manifested as containment of pathogen growth .
Outcomecontainment of pathogen growth e1 Verbatim
e0 “Among eight wild species evaluated for resistance against B. cinerea and A. solani , S. lycopersicoides expressed the highest levels of resistance against both pathogen s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–776 e1 “Resistance against B. cinerea manifested as containment of pathogen growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–852 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
S. cumini extract reduced pathogen mycelial growth by 18%.
Outcomemycelial growth of M. phaseolina e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “M. oleifera , M. azedarach , and S. cumini (61, 45 and 18% reduction) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1646 e1 “the mycelial growth of M. phaseolina by 77 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1543 t0 “Cockscomb (Celosia argentea ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–84 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.