View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Root stoichiometry accounted for a large part of microbial stoichiometry variance.
Outcomevariance in microbial stoichiometry e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “root stoichiometry accounted for a large part of the variance in microbial stoichiometry . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–958 t0 “Robinia pseudoacacia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Grazing decreased leaf, root , and litter C:N:P stoichiometry .
OutcomeC:N:P stoichiometry of leaf, root, litter e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “grazing decreased the C:N:P stoichiometry of leaf, root , litter and soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1800 t0 “grassland ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Biomass relative growth rate correlated negatively with root stoichiometry .
Outcomeroot stoichiometry e0 Directionnegatively correlated e0 Verbatim
e0 “BRGR were negatively correlated with root stoichiometry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1266 t0 “Populus deltoides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Root and leaf stoichiometry directly affected microbial biomass C:N and C:P in structural equation modeling.
Organ / stageroot stoichiometry and leaf stoichiometry e0 Outcomemicrobial biomass C:N and C:P e0 Qualifierroot stoichiometry had the greatest direct effect e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “root stoichiometry and leaf stoichiometry were two direct factors affecting microbial biomass C:N and C:P, and that root stoichiometry had the greatest direct effect. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1176 t0 “Robinia pseudoacacia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Under well-watered conditions, N-P addition markedly changed root stoichiometry .
Outcomeroot stoichiometry e0 Qualifierwell-watered conditions e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “N-P addition under well-watered conditions markedly altered root stoichiometry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1284 t0 “Robinia pseudoacacia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–131 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Root C:N:P stoichiometry showed no clear changes in G. uralensis .
OutcomeC:N:P stoichiometry e0 Directionno clear changes e0 Verbatim
e0 “no clear changes were observed in either green leaf or root C:N:P stoichiometry of G. uralensis . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1019 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
AM plant fine- root stoichiometry was mainly affected by the soil environment (8.76–90.12%).
Outcomefine-root stoichiometry e2 Qualifiermainly affected by the soil environment e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “the influence of mycorrhizae on Chinese plants’ fine- root stoichiometry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–292 e2 “The AM plants’ fine- root stoichiometry was mainly affected by the soil environment (8.76–90.12%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–753 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil total nitrogen and available phosphorus were significantly associated with root stoichiometry .
Outcomeroot stoichiometry e0 Settingsoil TN and available phosphorus (AP) e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “significant associations of soil TN and available phosphorus (AP) with root stoichiometry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1685 t0 “Robinia pseudoacacia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–131 Other claims from this paper (9) Association author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil salinity was the dominant determinant of leaf and root C:N:P stoichiometry .
Outcomeleaf’s and root’s C:N:P stoichiometry e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Soil salinity played a dominant role in determining leaf’s and root ’s C:N:P stoichiometry of P. australis . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1806–1912 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Grazing decreased soil C:N:P stoichiometry .
OutcomeC:N:P stoichiometry of leaf, root, litter and soil e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “grazing decreased the C:N:P stoichiometry of leaf, root , litter and soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1800 t0 “grassland ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–37 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.