View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Bioluminescence detection within 5 min was faster than the earlier light- sensitive film method .
bioluminescence was reliably detected e0 time advantage e0 our previously reported method with light-sensitive films e0 Verbatim
e0 “bioluminescence was reliably detected within 5 min, offering a significant time advantage over our previously reported method with light- sensitive films. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1558 e1 “Arabidopsis thaliana plants
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–720 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Remote LAI estimation method s were significantly sensitive to scale variation across method s.
sensitivity to variations in scale e0 remote estimation method e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “remote estimation techniques have a significant sensitivity to variations in scale, almost irrespective of the remote estimation method used ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1382 t0 “leaf area index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–77 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought tolerant plants had significantly fewer stomata than sensitive plants.
drought tolerant plants e0 the sensitive plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “significantly lower stomata numbers were shown in both drought tolerant plants than the sensitive plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1118 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt sensitive barley varieties showed significantly greater root cell damage.
salt sensitive varieties e0 damage to root cells e0 Verbatim
e0 “salt sensitive varieties showing significantly more damage to root cells ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1270 t0 “barley roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–94 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Na+ content and SPAD were significantly correlated in salt- sensitive soybean varieties.
salt-sensitive varieties e2 correlation between Na+ content and SPAD e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 e2 “There was a significant correlation between Na+ content and SPAD in salt- sensitive varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1028 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Infected leaves differed significantly between sensitive and resistant plum clones by all measurement method s.
PPV‐sensitive and PPV‐resistant plum clones e0 Verbatim
e0 “Significant differences were established between the infected leaves of the PPV‐ sensitive and PPV‐resistant plum clones, irrespective of the method of measurement ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–747 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
AFB1 and AFG2 levels were remarkably higher in the maize line GAF4 than in the sensitive line KDV1.
sensitive KDV1 e0 Verbatim
e0 “AFB1 and AFG2 were remarkably higher in GAF4 in comparison to sensitive KDV1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1169 e1 “co-infected maize tissues ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–290 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought tolerant walnut genotypes had higher photosynthetic efficiency than sensitive ones.
drought-tolerant genotypes e2 photosynthetic efficiency e1 sensitive ones e1 Verbatim
e0 “183 walnut genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–859 e1 “significantly higher antioxidant enzyme activity, osmotic regulation, and photosynthetic efficiency compared to sensitive ones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1537 e2 “drought-tolerant genotypes exhibited higher tolerance indices ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1260 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result significant (as stated) simulated Claim · model-written summary
In comparison with water treatments, the sensitive period of PHINT is significantly shorter under nitrogen treatments.
sensitive period of PHINT to time-series variables e1 water treatments e1 Verbatim
t0 “CERES-Maize model ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–76 e1 “In comparison with water treatments, the sensitive period of PHINT to time-series variables is significantly shorter under nitrogen treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1626 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource Cultivar parameters P1, P2, PHINT and P5 consistently dominated the simulated anthesis and maturity stages, with stable sensitivity across water and nitrogen treatments. Observation Cultivar parameters dominated the simulation of anthesis and maturity stages in maize. Method / resource Under different irrigation regimes, P1, PHINT and SRGF are the most influential parameters for LAIX and CWADX. Method / resource Under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes, RUE is the most sensitive ecotype parameter. Method / resource Under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes, SDUL and SLLL show high sensitivity. Method / resource Under different irrigation regimes, PHINT is the most sensitive parameter for LAI, CWAD and CNAD before jointing. Observation The influence of P1 on CNAD approaches its peak after jointing. Observation SRGF is highly sensitive for CNAD before tasseling. Observation RUE remains sensitive to LAI and CWAD throughout the growing season. Observation For CNAD, the TSI of cultivar, ecotype and soil parameters is highest at the seedling stage under water and nitrogen stresses. Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rapid-screen highly tolerant germplasms had higher indoor root waterlogging tolerance indices than generally tolerant and sensitive groups.
root waterlogging tolerance indices e0 generally tolerant and sensitive ones e0 Verbatim
e0 “highly tolerant germplasms identified by the rapid method exhibited significantly higher root waterlogging tolerance indices compared to generally tolerant and sensitive ones. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1401 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Arabidopsis thaliana.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Glycine max
Prunus domestica
Zea mays