View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Their correlations with non sulphate sulphur were nonsignificant.
non sulphate-S e0 correlations with non sulphate-S e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “However, their correlations with non sulphate -S were nonsignificant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–688 t0 “Linseed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil sulphur 40 kg/ha with foliar zinc sulphate 0.6% was at par with the sulphur 60 kg/ha and zinc sulphate treatment for plant height, number of leaves and chlorophyll content in garlic.
sulphur application at 40 kg/ha along with foliar application of zinc sulphate at 0.6 % e2 plant height, number of leaves and chlorophyll content of leaves e1 soil application of sulphur 60 kg/ha and foliar application Zinc sulphate @ 0.6% e1 Verbatim
t0 “garlic (Allium sativum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–87 e1 “soil application of sulphur 60 kg/ha and foliar application Zinc sulphate @ 0.6% was recorded maximum plant height, number of leaves and chlorophyll content of leaves in both the years as well as in pooled analysis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–397 e2 “sulphur application at 40 kg/ha along with foliar application of zinc sulphate at 0.6 % was found at par to it ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–519 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Splitting sulphate dressings did not significantly affect sulphur accumulation.
grass and clover mixtures t0 splitting of the dressings e0 accumulation of sulphur e0 no significant effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “This splitting of the dressings had no significant effect on the accumulation of sulphur by any seeds mixture. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1063 t0 “grass and clover mixtures ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–106 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Both elemental sulphur grades gave yield increases in pot trials not significantly different from potassium sulphate .
elemental S grades e2 not significantly different from applying potassium sulphate e2 potassium sulphate e2 Verbatim
t0 “sulphur source for grass and clover ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–74 e2 “In pot trials of ryegrass in a lowland soil and of ryegrass and clover in the upland soil both elemental S grades gave satisfactory yield increases which were not significantly different from applying potassium sulphate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–669 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
K rate had no significant effect on leached Mg, nitrate-nitrogen or sulphate - sulphur .
no_change inferred e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “pasture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–29 e7 “There was no measured significant K effect ( P > 0.10) on the amount of Mg, nitrate‐nitrogen and sulphate ‐ sulphur leached in either year ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1614 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Soil quick-test K increased with KCl rate at the March 2001 sampling, to 7.3, 9.2, 13.6 and 18.5 from an initial level of 7.0. Intervention effect Soil QT K decreased with KCl rate at the March 2002 sampling, to 5.5, 7.8, 8.1 and 8.5. Intervention effect The rate of K had only a small effect on initial soil Mg, Ca and Na QT levels. Intervention effect Pasture K content was significantly higher at the highest K rate than in the control. Intervention effect Increasing K rate did not significantly change pasture Mg and Ca in most months. Intervention effect Increasing K rate significantly decreased pasture Na. Intervention effect Increasing KCl rate significantly increased the amount of leached K in Year 1, to 17.5 kg ha −1 at the highest rate versus 7.0 kg ha −1 in the control. Intervention effect Increasing KCl rate significantly increased leached chloride in Year 1, to 64.6–146.6 kg ha −1. Intervention effect Increasing KCl rate significantly increased leached Ca in Year 1, to 30.4–60.1 kg ha −1. Intervention effect Increasing KCl rate significantly increased leached Na in Year 2, to 59.4–74.1 kg ha −1. Association Applying excess K fertiliser on allophanic soils to raise soil QT K above 7 is expected to reduce pasture uptake and the availability of Na to animals. Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Wigor S elementary sulphur gave slightly higher phosphorus, calcium and magnesium content than the sulphate forms, with differences generally not significant.
elementary sulphur form found in Wigor S e0 contents of phosphorus, calcium and magnesium e0 sulphate (VI) form e0 Verbatim
e0 “The elementary sulphur form found in Wigor S made it possible to reach slightly higher contents of phosphorus, calcium and magnesium than its sulphate (VI) form than the one used in a form of K2SO4 and (NH4)2SO4 however, in general, these differences were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1197 t0 “oat grain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The method of placement had no significant effect on the N efficiency of ammonium sulphate and sulphur -coated urea.
method of placement e6 N efficiency of AS and SCU e6 no significant effect e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “A comparison of ammonium sulphate (AS) with and without N-Serve and sulphur coated urea (SCU) as N sources for sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–127 e6 “the method of placement had no significant effect on the N efficiency of AS and SCU ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–848 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
SO2 exposure had no significant effect on lucerne grown with added sulphate .
had no significant effect e4 grown with added sulphate e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Growth of Lucerne (Medicago sativaL.) Exposed to Sulphur Dioxide ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64 e2 “Deficiency was alleviated through exposure of plants to ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–550 e4 “had no significant effect on plants grown with added sulphate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–772 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium sulphate with or without N-Serve did not differ significantly from sulphur -coated urea in tillering, leaf N concentration and cane yield.
ammonium sulphate (AS) with and without N-Serve e1 tillering, the leaf N concentration and cane yield e0 no significant differences e0 sulphurcoated urea (SCU) e1 Verbatim
e0 “studied in a pot experiment, showed that although the tillering, the leaf N concentration and cane yield were increased by adding fertilizer N there were no significant differences between N sources ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–327 e1 “A comparison of ammonium sulphate (AS) with and without N-Serve and sulphur coated urea (SCU) as N sources for sugarcane ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–127 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The P interaction had no significant effect with ammonium sulphate .
ammonium sulphate e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “without significant effect with ammonium sulphate or calcium ammonium nitrate plus gypsum types ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1315 t0 “herbage grown on peatland ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–119 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Allium sativum
Avena sativa
Medicago sativa