Refine

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sub-surface application of water hyacinth had a higher decomposition rate constant (0.041% week-1) than surface application (0.029% week-1).

Taxon
water hyacinthPontederia crassipese0
Treatment
sub-surface applicatione3
Outcome
rate constantse3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
0.041% week-1e3
Qualifier
0.029% week-1e3
Comparator
surface applicatione3

Verbatim

e0

“with water hyacinth were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–334
e3

“rate constants of surface and sub-surface application were 0.029% week-1 and 0.041% week-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–930

Title

USE OF WATER HYACINTH (Eichornia crassipes) IN AMELIORATION OF A SANDY SOIL

Mubarak A R; Fattoma A M Rezik; S A Afiah Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2008. doi:10.21608/ajs.2008.14640

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper-surface application matched lower-surface application in one trial at all concentrations and in another at higher concentrations.

Taxon
coffeeCoffeat0
Treatment
Upper‐surface applicatione0
Outcome
as effectivee0
Direction
as effectivee0
Qualifier
at the higher concentrationse0
Comparator
lowere0

Verbatim

e0

“Upper‐surface application was as effective as lower in one trial at all concentrations, and in another at the higher concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–947
t0

“coffee rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–26

Title

The control of coffee rust in Kenya by fungicides

R.W. RAYNER Annals of Applied Biology 1962. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1962.tb06007.x

Other claims from this paper (14)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface application caused fewer predator losses than surface application.

Treatment
sub‐surface treatmente0
Outcome
lossese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
surface treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“These losses were significantly reduced in the sub‐surface treatment compared with the surface treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–522
e1

“cabbage transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–207

Title

OBSERVATIONS ON THE EFFECT OF INSECTICIDES ON COLEOPTEROUS PREDATORS OF ERIOISCHIA BRASSICAE (DIPTERA: ANTHOMYIIDAE)

SHERIF A. HASSAN Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1969. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1969.tb02511.x

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface application of non-mobile fertilizer significantly reduced application efficiency.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
surface application of ‘non-mobile’ fertilisert1
Outcome
fertiliser application efficiencye0
Direction
losse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a significant loss of fertiliser application efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1381
t0

“SUGARCANE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68
t1

“surface application of ‘non-mobile’ fertiliser”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1222

Title

FARMING SYSTEM CHANGES AND FERTILISER LOSS IN AN IRRIGATED SUGARCANE AREA—THE BURDEKIN

G. J. Ham; R. C. Bruce 2007

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface application improved A. spinosa control.

Taxon
CUCURBITSt0
Treatment
Surface applicatione0
Interactor
A. spinosae0weed
Outcome
A. spinosae0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Surface application provided better control of Amaranthus hybridus and A. spinosa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–686
t0

“CUCURBITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44

Title

EVALUATION OF CLOMAZONE FOR USE IN CUCURBITS

Wayne C. Porter HortScience 1993. doi:10.21273/hortsci.28.4.270a

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application increased root surface area by 39%.

Treatment
biochar applicatione0
Outcome
surface areae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, biochar application increased root biomass (+32%), root volume (+29%) and surface area (39%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–538

Title

Effects of biochar application on root traits: a meta‐analysis

Yangzhou Xiang; Qi Deng; Honglang Duan; et al. GCB Bioenergy 2017. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12449

Other claims from this paper (12)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application surface did not significantly affect translocation.

Taxon
red mapleAcer rubrumt0
Treatment
application surfacee0
Outcome
translocatione0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application surface did not significantly affect translocation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–782
t0

“red maple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–140

Title

Effect of plant moisture stress and application surface on uptake and translocation of triclopyr with organosilicone surfactant in red maple seedlings

J.J. Bollig; J.R. Seiler; S.M. Zedaker; et al. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1995. doi:10.1139/x95-047

Other claims from this paper (10)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend avoiding surface application on windy days to reduce biochar loss.

Taxon
field cropse1
Outcome
avoiding surface application on windy dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“avoiding surface application on windy days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–554
e1

“field crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–65

Title

Biochar application on commercial field crops using farm-scale equipmen

Leanne Ejack; Joann Whalen; Julie Major; et al. Canadian Biosystems Engineering 2021. doi:10.7451/cbe.2021.63.6.1

Other claims from this paper (8)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Surface application may be beneficial to annual and perennial crops.

Taxon
annual and perennial cropse0
Outcome
surface applicatione0

Verbatim

e0

“surface application may be beneficial to annual and perennial crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1458

Title

Surface-applied or incorporated biochar and compost combination improves soil fertility, Chinese cabbage and papaya biomass

Justine Cox; Nguyen V. Hue; Amjad Ahmad; et al. Biochar 2021. doi:10.1007/s42773-020-00081-z

Other claims from this paper (14)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ditch application gave greater yield than surface application.

Treatment
Ditch applicatione0
Outcome
greater valuese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
surface applicatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Ditch application recorded greater values over surface application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–788
t0

“Wheat and Rice Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–67

Title

Rates and Methods of Rice Straw Application to Wheat and Rice Crops and the Implications on Crop Productivity as Well as some Soil Properties

A Ewis; M Sobh; M Amer; et al. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science 2014. doi:10.21608/ejss.2014.126

Other claims from this paper (8)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.