View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Triticale lines showed no significant differences in ability to survive winter.
triticale lines e1 ability to survive winter e1 Verbatim
t0 “Evaluation of Experimental Winter Triticale Lines for Adaptation in Montana (2001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 e1 “Plant densities and percent stand indicate no significant differences among the triticale lines in their ability to survive winter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–359 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The ability to emerge or survive in undisturbed vegetation relative to gaps was not strongly related to mean seed mass of the species.
Old-Field Communities t0 mean seed mass e1 Ability to emerge or survive e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Seedling Colonization of Experimental Gaps in Two Old-Field Communities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 e1 “Ability to emerge or survive in undisturbed vegetation relative to gaps was not strongly related to mean seed mass of the species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–827 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Race survival did not differ statistically, though race 0 tended to survive better across both years.
no statistical differences e0 between races e0 Verbatim
e0 “There were no statistical differences in survival between races, but over both years of the study there was a trend for race 0 to survive better than race 1. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2338–2495 e1 “Deployment of tobacco cultivars with single-gene (Ph) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Beetle sex did not have a significant effect on the ability to survive most monoterpene volatiles.
ability to survive e5 did not have a significant effect e5 with most monoterpenes e5 Verbatim
e2 “We assessed the toxicity of the ten most abundant monoterpenes of lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta ), a major host in the current MPB epidemic, against adult MPB from two locations in British Columbia, Canada ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–444 e5 “MPB body weight had a significant positive effect on the ability to survive most monoterpene volatiles, while sex did not have a significant effect with most monoterpenes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–971 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed survival did not differ significantly between substrates.
VALLISNERIA SPIRALIS L. t0 did not differ e0 Verbatim
e0 “but its survive rate did not differ significantly between the two substrates under undisturbed condition. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3710–3815 t0 “VALLISNERIA SPIRALIS L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–102 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Seedling survival of 26%-40% did not differ significantly among disturbances.
seedling survive e0 not significantly different e0 Verbatim
t0 “Ageratina adenophora
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–110 e0 “The percentages of seed germination(40%-50%),seedling survive (26%-40%) and establishment(11%-15%)were not significantly different between disturbances. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1023 Other claims from this paper (14) Association Under-canopy irradiance rose with disturbance intensity. Observation Relative under-canopy irradiance was 6%, 9%, 16%, 20% and 28% after disturbances of 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35 cm diameter, respectively. Observation Seeds germinated at every disturbance intensity. Observation Seedlings survived and colonized at every disturbance intensity. Association Germination of 40%-50% did not differ significantly among disturbances. Association Seedling establishment of 11%-15% did not differ significantly among disturbances. Observation No seedlings established at 100% irradiance. Association Height, crown width and leaf number increased with disturbance. Association Leaf length, width and individual leaf area increased with disturbance. Association Total leaf area increased with disturbance. Observation Crown width, leaf number and total leaf area were greatest at 100% irradiance. Observation Ageratina tolerated shade strongly.Association Small disturbances may permit Ageratina invasion. Mechanism Slow growth in adverse environments and rapid growth after improvement may be an invasion strategy. Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulator concentration did not significantly affect Mucuna survival percentage or leaf number.
concentration of growth regulators e0 survive percentage and number of leaves e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The concentration of growth regulators and their interactions did not significantly affect the survive percentage and number of leaves in Mucuna bracteata . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1313 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Interactions between growth regulators and shallot extract did not significantly affect Mucuna survival or leaf number.
their interactions e0 survive percentage and number of leaves e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The concentration of growth regulators and their interactions did not significantly affect the survive percentage and number of leaves in Mucuna bracteata . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1313 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Late successional plant cover in refugia was not significantly greater in 2016.
Late successional plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “Late successional plants were found to produce significantly more cover in the refugia in 2015 but not in 2016 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1064 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sowing dates had no significant effect on oil and protein seed content.
oil and protein seed content e6 no significant effect e6 Verbatim
t0 “Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–82 e6 “sowing dates had no significant effect on both oil and protein seed content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1520 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
×Triticosecalet0
Nicotiana tabacum
Pinus contorta_2.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Ageratina adenophora
Mucuna bracteata.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Gossypium barbadense