By interacting organism › Animals › Lyonetiidae

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coffee leaf miner was suggested to resemble Leucoptera coffeella.

Taxon: Arabica Coffee Crops (Coffea arabica L.)Coffea arabicat0
Interactor: Leucoptera coffeellaLeucoptera coffeellae0pest
Outcome: suggested similare0

Verbatim

e0
“The CLM found were suggested similar with CLM attacked in neotropical countrys which was identified Leucoptera coffeella”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–871

t0
“Arabica Coffee Crops (Coffea arabica L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–112

Title

Survey on Coffee Leaf Miner Incidences and Potential Parasitic Wasps on Arabica Coffee Crops (Coffea arabica L.) at Probolinggo highland East Java Indonesia

Hari Purnomo; Wildan Muhlison; Irwanto Sucipto; et al. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2025. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1497/1/012008

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coffee plants tolerated pest densities up to 15% mined leaves.

Taxon: Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicat0
Interactor: Leucoptera coffeellaLeucoptera coffeellae1pest
Outcome: tolerant to low densitiese0
Value: up to 15% mined leavese0

Verbatim

e0
“Coffee plants were tolerant to low densities (up to 15% mined leaves) of the pest”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1024

e1
“Leucoptera coffeella”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–20

t0
“Coffea arabica”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–174

Title

Economic Injury Levels and Economic Thresholds for Leucoptera coffeella as a Function of Insecticide Application Technology in Organic and Conventional Coffee (Coffea arabica), Farms

Marcelo Coutinho Picanço Filho; Eraldo Lima; Daiane das Graças do Carmo; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13050585

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Control cost in organic crops was 16.98% higher than conventional crops.
Observation Manual application had the highest control cost, followed by drone, airplane and tractor.
Observation At low pest density, losses reached 6.56%.
Observation At 54.20% mined leaves, losses reached 85.62%.
Observation EIL was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation ET was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation Economic injury level was 14% mined leaves.
Observation Economic threshold was 11% mined leaves.
Recommendation The authors recommend incorporating the indices into integrated pest management for C. arabica.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low pest density, losses reached 6.56%.

Taxon: Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicat0
Interactor: Leucoptera coffeellaLeucoptera coffeellae1pest
Outcome: lossese0
Value: up to 6.56%e0
Qualifier: up to 15% mined leavese0

Verbatim

e0
“low densities (up to 15% mined leaves) of the pest that caused losses of up to 6.56%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1058

e1
“Leucoptera coffeella”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–20

t0
“Coffea arabica”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–174

Title

Economic Injury Levels and Economic Thresholds for Leucoptera coffeella as a Function of Insecticide Application Technology in Organic and Conventional Coffee (Coffea arabica), Farms

Marcelo Coutinho Picanço Filho; Eraldo Lima; Daiane das Graças do Carmo; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13050585

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Control cost in organic crops was 16.98% higher than conventional crops.
Observation Manual application had the highest control cost, followed by drone, airplane and tractor.
Observation Coffee plants tolerated pest densities up to 15% mined leaves.
Observation At 54.20% mined leaves, losses reached 85.62%.
Observation EIL was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation ET was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation Economic injury level was 14% mined leaves.
Observation Economic threshold was 11% mined leaves.
Recommendation The authors recommend incorporating the indices into integrated pest management for C. arabica.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 54.20% mined leaves, losses reached 85.62%.

Taxon: Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicat0
Interactor: Leucoptera coffeellaLeucoptera coffeellae1pest
Outcome: lossese0
Value: 85.62%e0
Qualifier: 54.20% mined leavese0

Verbatim

e0
“At high pest densities (54.20% mined leaves), losses were high (85.62%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1132

e1
“Leucoptera coffeella”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–20

t0
“Coffea arabica”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–174

Title

Economic Injury Levels and Economic Thresholds for Leucoptera coffeella as a Function of Insecticide Application Technology in Organic and Conventional Coffee (Coffea arabica), Farms

Marcelo Coutinho Picanço Filho; Eraldo Lima; Daiane das Graças do Carmo; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13050585

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Control cost in organic crops was 16.98% higher than conventional crops.
Observation Manual application had the highest control cost, followed by drone, airplane and tractor.
Observation Coffee plants tolerated pest densities up to 15% mined leaves.
Observation At low pest density, losses reached 6.56%.
Observation EIL was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation ET was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation Economic injury level was 14% mined leaves.
Observation Economic threshold was 11% mined leaves.
Recommendation The authors recommend incorporating the indices into integrated pest management for C. arabica.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EIL was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.

Taxon: Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicat0
Interactor: Leucoptera coffeellaLeucoptera coffeellae1pest
Outcome: EILe0
Direction: similare0
Setting: organic and conventional cropse0

Verbatim

e0
“In organic and conventional crops and with the use of different insecticide application technologies, EIL and ET were similar.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1259

e1
“Leucoptera coffeella”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–20

t0
“Coffea arabica”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–174

Title

Economic Injury Levels and Economic Thresholds for Leucoptera coffeella as a Function of Insecticide Application Technology in Organic and Conventional Coffee (Coffea arabica), Farms

Marcelo Coutinho Picanço Filho; Eraldo Lima; Daiane das Graças do Carmo; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13050585

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Control cost in organic crops was 16.98% higher than conventional crops.
Observation Manual application had the highest control cost, followed by drone, airplane and tractor.
Observation Coffee plants tolerated pest densities up to 15% mined leaves.
Observation At low pest density, losses reached 6.56%.
Observation At 54.20% mined leaves, losses reached 85.62%.
Observation ET was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation Economic injury level was 14% mined leaves.
Observation Economic threshold was 11% mined leaves.
Recommendation The authors recommend incorporating the indices into integrated pest management for C. arabica.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ET was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.

Taxon: Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicat0
Interactor: Leucoptera coffeellaLeucoptera coffeellae1pest
Outcome: ETe0
Direction: similare0
Setting: organic and conventional cropse0

Verbatim

e0
“In organic and conventional crops and with the use of different insecticide application technologies, EIL and ET were similar.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1259

e1
“Leucoptera coffeella”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–20

t0
“Coffea arabica”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–174

Title

Economic Injury Levels and Economic Thresholds for Leucoptera coffeella as a Function of Insecticide Application Technology in Organic and Conventional Coffee (Coffea arabica), Farms

Marcelo Coutinho Picanço Filho; Eraldo Lima; Daiane das Graças do Carmo; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13050585

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Control cost in organic crops was 16.98% higher than conventional crops.
Observation Manual application had the highest control cost, followed by drone, airplane and tractor.
Observation Coffee plants tolerated pest densities up to 15% mined leaves.
Observation At low pest density, losses reached 6.56%.
Observation At 54.20% mined leaves, losses reached 85.62%.
Observation EIL was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation Economic injury level was 14% mined leaves.
Observation Economic threshold was 11% mined leaves.
Recommendation The authors recommend incorporating the indices into integrated pest management for C. arabica.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic injury level was 14% mined leaves.

Taxon: Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicat0
Interactor: Leucoptera coffeellaLeucoptera coffeellae1pest
Outcome: EILe0
Value: 14%e0

Verbatim

e0
“The EIL and ET were 14% and 11% of mined leaves, respectively.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1322

e1
“Leucoptera coffeella”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–20

t0
“Coffea arabica”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–174

Title

Economic Injury Levels and Economic Thresholds for Leucoptera coffeella as a Function of Insecticide Application Technology in Organic and Conventional Coffee (Coffea arabica), Farms

Marcelo Coutinho Picanço Filho; Eraldo Lima; Daiane das Graças do Carmo; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13050585

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Control cost in organic crops was 16.98% higher than conventional crops.
Observation Manual application had the highest control cost, followed by drone, airplane and tractor.
Observation Coffee plants tolerated pest densities up to 15% mined leaves.
Observation At low pest density, losses reached 6.56%.
Observation At 54.20% mined leaves, losses reached 85.62%.
Observation EIL was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation ET was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation Economic threshold was 11% mined leaves.
Recommendation The authors recommend incorporating the indices into integrated pest management for C. arabica.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic threshold was 11% mined leaves.

Taxon: Coffea arabicaCoffea arabicat0
Interactor: Leucoptera coffeellaLeucoptera coffeellae1pest
Outcome: ETe0
Value: 11% of mined leavese0

Verbatim

e0
“The EIL and ET were 14% and 11% of mined leaves, respectively.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1322

e1
“Leucoptera coffeella”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–20

t0
“Coffea arabica”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–174

Title

Economic Injury Levels and Economic Thresholds for Leucoptera coffeella as a Function of Insecticide Application Technology in Organic and Conventional Coffee (Coffea arabica), Farms

Marcelo Coutinho Picanço Filho; Eraldo Lima; Daiane das Graças do Carmo; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13050585

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Control cost in organic crops was 16.98% higher than conventional crops.
Observation Manual application had the highest control cost, followed by drone, airplane and tractor.
Observation Coffee plants tolerated pest densities up to 15% mined leaves.
Observation At low pest density, losses reached 6.56%.
Observation At 54.20% mined leaves, losses reached 85.62%.
Observation EIL was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation ET was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation Economic injury level was 14% mined leaves.
Recommendation The authors recommend incorporating the indices into integrated pest management for C. arabica.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend incorporating the indices into integrated pest management for C. arabica.

Taxon: C. arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Interactor: Leucoptera coffeellaLeucoptera coffeellae1pest
Outcome: integrated pest management programse0

Verbatim

e0
“these indices can be incorporated in integrated pest management programs in C. arabica crops”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1426

e1
“Leucoptera coffeella”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–20

Title

Economic Injury Levels and Economic Thresholds for Leucoptera coffeella as a Function of Insecticide Application Technology in Organic and Conventional Coffee (Coffea arabica), Farms

Marcelo Coutinho Picanço Filho; Eraldo Lima; Daiane das Graças do Carmo; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13050585

Other claims from this paper (9)

Observation Control cost in organic crops was 16.98% higher than conventional crops.
Observation Manual application had the highest control cost, followed by drone, airplane and tractor.
Observation Coffee plants tolerated pest densities up to 15% mined leaves.
Observation At low pest density, losses reached 6.56%.
Observation At 54.20% mined leaves, losses reached 85.62%.
Observation EIL was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation ET was similar across organic and conventional crops and application technologies.
Observation Economic injury level was 14% mined leaves.
Observation Economic threshold was 11% mined leaves.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coffee leaf miner attacked arabica coffee at the same altitude.

Taxon: arabica coffeeCoffea arabicae0
Interactor: Leucoptera coffeellaLeucoptera coffeellae0pest
Outcome: coffee leaf miner ( Leucoptera coffeella ) can attacke0
Qualifier: at the same altitudee1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“coffee leaf miner ( Leucoptera coffeella ) can attack arabica coffee plantation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1115

e1
“at the same altitude”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–976

Title

The explosion of pests and diseases due to climate change

Alfizar; S S Nasution IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2024. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1297/1/012072

Other claims from this paper (5)

Lyonetiidae 209 claims

209 claims